The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health benefits of low glycaemic index foods, such as pulses, in diabetic patients and healthy individuals
Open accessAbstract
The present paper covers the health benefits of low glycaemic index foods, such as pulses. Nutritional factors potentially play a crucial role in health and disease. A low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet is often recommended as a part of a healthy life-style. Historical works have shown that carbohydrate foods differ in their ability to affect post-ingestive glycaemia. The glycaemic index concept allows a ranking of carbohydrate-rich foods in terms of their blood glucose raising potential. Pulses are foods with very low glycaemic index values. Numerous studies have documented the health benefits that can be obtained by selecting foods of low glycaemic index. These benefits are of crucial importance in the dietary treatment of diabetes mellitus: glycaemic control is improved as well as several metabolic parameters, such as blood lipids. The results of human studies have been confirmed by animal experiments in the field of diabetes. Diets with low glycaemic index value improve the prevention of coronary heart disease in diabetic and healthy subjects. In obese or overweight individuals, low-glycaemic index meals increase satiety and facilitate the control of food intake. Selecting low glycaemic index foods has also demonstrated benefits for healthy persons in terms of post-prandial glucose and lipid metabolism. Several public health organizations have recently integrated consideration of the glycaemic index in their nutritional recommendations for patients with metabolic diseases and for the general population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietary Fiber, Glycemic Load, and Risk of NIDDM in Men
Salmerón, J., Ascherio, A., Rimm, E. B., Colditz, G. A., Spiegelman, D., Jenkins, D. J., Stampfer, M. J., Wing, A. L., & Willett, W. C. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.4.545 · Cited by 1,426
The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications
Wolever, T., Jenkins, D., Jenkins, A., & Josse, R. (1991) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/54.5.846 · Cited by 1,168
Liu, S., Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., Hu, F. B., Franz, M., Sampson, L., Hennekens, C. H., & Manson, J. E. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1455 · Cited by 1,166 · cited 2×
“CHD was better predicted by the GI than by the typical measures of total, simple or complex CHO in the diet (Liu et al. 2000).”
BackgroundHigh glycemic index foods, overeating, and obesity
Ludwig, D. S., Majzoub, J. A., Al-Zahrani, A., Dallal, G. E., Blanco, I., & Roberts, S. B. (1999) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.103.3.e26 · Cited by 699 · cited 1×
“Obese teenage boys participated in three test meals of low, medium or high GI (Ludwig et al. 1999).”
BackgroundJärvi, A. E., Karlström, B. E., Granfeldt, Y. E., Björck, I. E., Asp, N. G., & Vessby, B. O. (1999) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.22.1.10 · Cited by 484 · cited 4×
“Furthermore, Jarvi et al. (1999) showed a net decrease in glucose and insulin responses throughout the day, and an improvement of lipid profile and fibrinolytic capacity, following a strictly controlled low-GI diet when compared to a high-GI diet.”
BackgroundInfluentialLiu, S., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Holmes, M. D., Hu, F. B., Hankinson, S. E., & Willett, W. C. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.3.560 · Cited by 454
Factors affecting starch digestibility and the glycemic response with special reference to legumes
Thorne, M., Thompson, L., & Jenkins, D. (1983) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/38.3.481 · Cited by 304
Jenkins, D. J. A., Wolever, T. M. S., Jenkins, A. L., Thorne, M. J., Lee, R., Kalmusky, J., Reichert, R., & Wong, G. S. (1983) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00282710 · Cited by 292 · cited 2×
“Pulses are foods with interestingly low GI, since the lowest glycaemic responses for starchy foods have been reported after consumption of dried legumes (Jenkins et al. 1981b, 1983; Bornet et al. 1997).”
Backgroundvan Dam, R., Visscher, A., Feskens, E., Verhoef, P., & Kromhout, D. (2000) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601086 · Cited by 212
Meal-Generated Oxidative Stress in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Ceriello, A., Bortolotti, N., Motz, E., Crescentini, A., Lizzio, S., Russo, A., Tonutti, L., & Taboga, C. (1998) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.21.9.1529 · Cited by 211 · cited 2×
“1999) and the generation of oxidative stress (Ceriello et al. 1998) in NIDDM.”
BackgroundBeneficial Effect of a Low Glycaemic Index Diet in Type 2 Diabetes
Wolever, T. M. S., Jenkins, D. J. A., Vuksan, V., Jenkins, A. L., Buckley, G. C., Wong, G. S., & Josse, R. G. (1992) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01816.x · Cited by 195
Pawlak, D. B., Bryson, J. M., Denyer, G. S., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2001) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/131.1.99 · Cited by 103
Cited by
A plant-based diet for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes.
(2017) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.05.009 · Cited by 320
Hermsdorff, H. H. M., Zulet, M. Á., Abete, I., & Martínez, J. A. (2011) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-010-0115-x · Cited by 223
Meta-analysis of the health effects of using the glycaemic index in meal-planning
Opperman, A. M., Venter, C. S., Oosthuizen, W., Thompson, R. L., & Vorster, H. H. (2004) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20041203 · Cited by 192
Ferreira, H., Vasconcelos, M., Gil, A. M., & Pinto, E. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1716680 · Cited by 175
Low glycaemic index diets for coronary heart disease
Kelly, S. A., Frost, G., Whittaker, V., & Summerbell, C. D. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004467.pub2 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Rizkalla, S. W., Bellisle, F., & Slama, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- S3
- Pages
- 255-262
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2031693160
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.