Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WHAT MOTIVATES PEOPLE TO TEACH, AND WHY DO THEY LEAVE? ACCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMATIVITY AND TEACHER RETENTION

Open access
Perryman, Jane, Calvert, Graham·2020·British Journal of Educational Studies

Abstract

A longstanding problem in the teacher workforce, internationally and in the UK, is the continuing and substantial numbers of qualified teachers who leave the profession within five years. This paper uses data collected from a survey to the last five years of teacher education graduates of UCL Institute of Education (IOE) in London, to explore what originally motivated them to teach, and the reasons why they have left or may consider leaving in the future. We discovered that despite claiming to be aware of the challenges of workload before entering teaching, workload was the most frequently cited reason for having left, or for leaving in the future. The data spoke to the reality of teaching being worse than expected, and the nature (rather than the quantity) of the workload, linked to notions of performativity and accountability, being a crucial factor. This paper draws on a substantial new source of data and explores reasons for leaving in the context of reported initial motivation of individuals who have left teaching, individuals who are planning to leave and individuals who are planning to stay in teaching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Allen R., 2017, Education Economics, 26, 1
  2. 10.1088/0031-9112/29/7/006 · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/29/7/006
  3. Cater J., 2017, Wither Teacher Education and Training
  4. 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c2s2m · doi:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c2s2m
  5. Ewing R., 2003, English Teaching Practice and Technique, 2, 15
  6. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b364f · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31828b364f
  7. House of Commons Education Committee, 2017, Recruitment and Retention of Teachers
  8. Ingersoll R., 2016, The Working Lives of Educators, 73, 44
  9. 10.1177/002248718603700605 · doi:10.1177/002248718603700605
  10. Karsentil T., 2013, Education, 3, 141
  11. Lynch S., 2016, Engaging Teachers: NFER Analysis of Teacher Retention
  12. 10.1080/02701367.2014.893052 · doi:10.1080/02701367.2014.893052
  13. Pohar M., 2004, Metodoloski Zvezki, 1, 143
  14. 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.007 · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.007
  15. Stoel, 2002, Teachers’ Professional Lives – A View from Nine Industrialized Countries
  16. 10.1177/0141076817738500 · doi:10.1177/0141076817738500

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Perryman, J., & Calvert, G.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Studies
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
3-23
ISSN
  • 0007-1005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8527
OpenAlex
W2929321846
Cited by
353
References
34
FWCI
70.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WHAT MOTIVATES PEOPLE TO TEACH, AND WHY DO THEY LEAVE? ACCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMATIVITY AND TEACHER RETENTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417
The paper
Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). WHAT MOTIVATES PEOPLE TO TEACH, AND WHY DO THEY LEAVE? ACCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMATIVITY AND TEACHER RETENTION. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.