Cited by 24Education during COVID-19 pandemicDisability Education and EmploymentCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Learning from autistic teachers: lessons about change in an era of COVID-19

Open access
Wood, Rebecca, Crane, Laura, Happé, Francesca, Moyse, Ruth·2024·Educational Review

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in major upheavals in the school education sector, particularly during periods of “lockdown” and remote working. While the impact of these changes on pupils, parents and school staff, both nationally and internationally, has been well-documented, there has been scant consideration of the effects on disabled educators. In addition, the mixed nature of the existing research findings in the special education context – revealing positives, as well as negatives from Covid-related adjustments – suggests the need to learn broader lessons from the impact of these measures. In this article, we report on findings from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 21 autistic school staff working in a range of roles in schools in the UK. Using thematic analysis, participants’ experiences of lockdown were analysed. Importantly, these were also compared with participants’ experiences outside of the pandemic. The resulting five themes – sensory issues and the working environment; communication and social barriers and freedoms; stresses and strengths associated with technology; navigating home/school boundaries; and modalities of change – revealed some of the significant difficulties autistic school staff typically experience in their work, as well as the factors that intersect with these. Although periods of Covid-related measures created additional stresses for participants, they also provided a respite from the usual pressures, and indeed enabled their strengths – including an ability to manage change – to be more manifest. Valuable insights, which could benefit autistic school staff, pupils with special educational needs and disabilities, and the whole school community in the UK and beyond, are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00131911.2022.2103521

Cites

80 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative findings showed that many participants believed WFH helped them to feel less anxious.

    “Qualitative findings showed that many participants believed WFH helped them to feel less anxious [60]”
  • Some described confusion between home and work boundaries as negatively affecting self-identity, as they had different 'work personas' that they had to negotiate when WFH.

    “Additionally, some described confusion between home and work boundaries as negatively affecting self-identity, as they had different 'work personas' that they had to negotiate when WFH [60].”
  • Qualitative findings showed that many participants believed WFH helped them to feel more relaxed.

    “and more relaxed [60]”
  • This meant they could choose to work during the hours they were most effective, taking breaks when needed, allowing them to feel they had greater autonomy.

    “This meant they could choose to work during the hours they were most effective [57,59], taking breaks when needed [39,50], allowing them to feel they had greater autonomy [42,60].”
  • When in the workplace (rather than at home) participants often struggled with distracting background noises, overly bright lights, odours and unwanted physical contact, all of which caused substantial sensory distress and could reduce focus, productivity and cause fatigue, particularly for those with ASD.

    “when in the workplace (rather than at home) participants often struggled with distracting background noises, overly bright lights, odours and unwanted physical contact, all of which caused substantial sensory distress [54,58,60] and could reduce focus, productivity [39] and cause fatigue [60], particularly for those with ASD.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cope, R., & Remington, A. (2022). The strengths and abilities of autistic people in the workplace. Autism in Adulthood , 4 (1), 22 -31. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.00371 · DOI
  2. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
  3. Shakespeare, T., Ndagire, F., & Seketi, Q. E. (2021). Triple jeopardy: Disabled people and the COVID19 pandemic. Lancet (London, England) , 397 (10282), 1331 -1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(21)00625-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, R., Crane, L., Happé, F., & Moyse, R.
Affiliations
  • University of East London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
Corresponding author
Wood, Rebecca
Venue
Educational Review
Published
2022-08-11
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
1209-1231
ISSN
  • 0013-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3397
OpenAlex
W4296571091
Cited by
24
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
John and Lorna Wing Foundation.
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, school lockdown, special educational needs and disabilities, sensory disturbances, communication barriers, educational technology, coping with change, remote teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review