Cited by 70Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsRegional Development and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entrepreneurial ecosystems: towards a systemic approach to entrepreneurship?

Open access
Fredin, Sabrina, Lidén, Alina·2020·Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography

Abstract

Despite its relative newness, entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) have attracted much attention from research and policy but they are recognized to be largely untheorized. It is claimed that one aspect which distinguishes the EE perspective from other perspectives related to business environments is its systemic approach; however, much of the systemic approach still needs to be investigated. The aim of this paper is therefore to investigate how the systemic and complex approach of EEs can be theoretically strengthened. We do this by investigating what values complex adaptive system theory holds for advancing the EE perspective. We highlight four propositions which are of particular importance for strengthening the systemic approach of EE: spatial and component boundaries of the system; self-governance; the relational dimension between system components and the system; and the evolution of the system. We propose that boundaries should be seen as a natural part of the system, that a complex system is too complex to capture all components and all interactions, and that studying only individual activities will not enable us to fully understand the system’s behaviour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00167223.2020.1769491

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This ignores the systemness of entrepreneurial ecosystems and thus ignores one of the main arguments of the (eco)system perspective.

    “This ignores the systemness of entrepreneurial eco -systems and thus ignores one of the main arguments of the (eco)system perspective ( Fredin & Lidén, 2020; Stam & Van de Ven, 2019 ).”

    From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Fredin & Lidén, 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Acs, Z., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. & Szerb, L. (2014). The continued search for the Solow residual: The role of national entrepreneurial ecosystem. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 8652, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. · DOI
  2. 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1287/orsc.10.3.216 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126 · DOI
  5. Auerswald P., 2015, The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness, 54
  6. Auerswald P., 2018, New Oxford handbook of economic geography, 245
  7. 10.1007/s11187-017-9869-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/9781118970812.ch19 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa · DOI
  10. 10.1093/icc/dtz033 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1 · DOI
  14. Cilliers P., 1998, Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems
  15. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00463.x · DOI
  16. 10.1002/bse.428 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5 · DOI
  19. 10.1287/orsc.10.3.358 · DOI
  20. 10.1023/A:1022375910940 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/9781119204459 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/icc/10.4.861 · DOI
  23. 10.4337/9781782546818 · DOI
  24. Gell-Mann M., 1994, Systems thinking
  25. 10.1007/s11187-017-9958-3 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Goldstein J., 2011, The sage handbook of complexity and management
  27. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.077 · DOI
  28. Holland J. H., 1998, Emergence from chaos to order, 10.1093/oso/9780198504092.001.0001 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z · DOI
  30. Isenberg D. J., 2010, Harvard Business Review, 88, 40
  31. 10.1093/icc/dtz034 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1108/JEPP-09-2019-115 · DOI
  33. Kauffman S. A., 1993, Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution, 10.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1504/IJIRD.2016.079462 · DOI
  35. Langton C. G., 1996, The philosophy of artificial life
  36. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093440 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/13511610.2019.1612737 · DOI
  38. 10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00965-5 · DOI
  39. Lichtenstein, 2011, The Sage handbook of complexity and management
  40. 10.1177/0042098015586547 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/gec3.12359 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mason, C. & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship, The Hague, Netherlands.
  43. 10.1007/s11187-017-9868-4 · DOI
  44. 10.1177/0003603X0605100103 · DOI
  45. Motoyama Y., 2014, Examining the connections within the startup ecosystem: A case study of St. Louis (Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship)
  46. Neck H. M., 2004, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42, 190
  47. Nicolis G., 1977, Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems
  48. 10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2 · DOI
  49. Pascale R. T., 1999, Sloan Management Review, 40, 83
  50. 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1080/00343404.2016.1255319 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.08.002 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734260 · DOI
  55. Simatupang T. M., 2015, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26, 389
  56. 10.1504/IJIRD.2016.077889 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/etap.12167 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00166-2 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Stam E., 2017, Sage handbook for entrepreneurship and small business
  61. Stam E., 2019, Small Business Economics, 1
  62. Sterman J. D., 2000, Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world
  63. 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01067.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fredin, S., & Lidén, A.
Affiliations
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Fredin, Sabrina
Venue
Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography
Published
2020-06-16
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
87-97
ISSN
  • 0016-7223 (ISSN-L)
  • 1903-2471
OpenAlex
W3036404170
Cited by
70
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Högskolan Kristianstad Publikationer (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
Keywords
entrepreneurial ecosystems, systems approach, complex adaptive systems theory, business environment, system boundaries, self-government, relational dimension, system evolution, entrepreneurship theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review