The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: towards a systemic approach to entrepreneurship?
Open accessAbstract
Despite its relative newness, entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) have attracted much attention from research and policy but they are recognized to be largely untheorized. It is claimed that one aspect which distinguishes the EE perspective from other perspectives related to business environments is its systemic approach; however, much of the systemic approach still needs to be investigated. The aim of this paper is therefore to investigate how the systemic and complex approach of EEs can be theoretically strengthened. We do this by investigating what values complex adaptive system theory holds for advancing the EE perspective. We highlight four propositions which are of particular importance for strengthening the systemic approach of EE: spatial and component boundaries of the system; self-governance; the relational dimension between system components and the system; and the evolution of the system. We propose that boundaries should be seen as a natural part of the system, that a complex system is too complex to capture all components and all interactions, and that studying only individual activities will not enable us to fully understand the system’s behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This ignores the systemness of entrepreneurial ecosystems and thus ignores one of the main arguments of the (eco)system perspective.
“This ignores the systemness of entrepreneurial eco -systems and thus ignores one of the main arguments of the (eco)system perspective ( Fredin & Lidén, 2020; Stam & Van de Ven, 2019 ).”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Fredin & Lidén, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1268 · Cited by 1,163
Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8 · Cited by 977
Chaos, self-organization, and psychology.
Barton, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.1.5 · Cited by 309
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- Acs, Z., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. & Szerb, L. (2014). The continued search for the Solow residual: The role of national entrepreneurial ecosystem. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 8652, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. · DOI
- 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.10.3.216 · DOI
- 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126 · DOI
- Auerswald P., 2015, The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness, 54
- Auerswald P., 2018, New Oxford handbook of economic geography, 245
- 10.1007/s11187-017-9869-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9781118970812.ch19 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa · DOI
- 10.1093/icc/dtz033 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1 · DOI
- Cilliers P., 1998, Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems
- 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00463.x · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.428 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.10.3.358 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022375910940 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119204459 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/icc/10.4.861 · DOI
- 10.4337/9781782546818 · DOI
- Gell-Mann M., 1994, Systems thinking
- 10.1007/s11187-017-9958-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldstein J., 2011, The sage handbook of complexity and management
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.077 · DOI
- Holland J. H., 1998, Emergence from chaos to order, 10.1093/oso/9780198504092.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z · DOI
- Isenberg D. J., 2010, Harvard Business Review, 88, 40
- 10.1093/icc/dtz034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/JEPP-09-2019-115 · DOI
- Kauffman S. A., 1993, Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution, 10.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1504/IJIRD.2016.079462 · DOI
- Langton C. G., 1996, The philosophy of artificial life
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093440 · DOI
- 10.1080/13511610.2019.1612737 · DOI
- 10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00965-5 · DOI
- Lichtenstein, 2011, The Sage handbook of complexity and management
- 10.1177/0042098015586547 · DOI
- 10.1111/gec3.12359 · DOI · Paper page
- Mason, C. & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship, The Hague, Netherlands.
- 10.1007/s11187-017-9868-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003603X0605100103 · DOI
- Motoyama Y., 2014, Examining the connections within the startup ecosystem: A case study of St. Louis (Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship)
- Neck H. M., 2004, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42, 190
- Nicolis G., 1977, Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems
- 10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2 · DOI
- Pascale R. T., 1999, Sloan Management Review, 40, 83
- 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00343404.2016.1255319 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734260 · DOI
- Simatupang T. M., 2015, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26, 389
- 10.1504/IJIRD.2016.077889 · DOI
- 10.1111/etap.12167 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00166-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · DOI · Paper page
- Stam E., 2017, Sage handbook for entrepreneurship and small business
- Stam E., 2019, Small Business Economics, 1
- Sterman J. D., 2000, Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world
- 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01067.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789
“This ignores the systemness of entrepreneurial eco - systems and thus ignores one of the main arguments of the (eco)system perspective ( Fredin & Lidén, 2020; Stam & Van de Ven, 2019 ).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Fredin, S., & Lidén, A.
- Affiliations
- Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Fredin, Sabrina
- Venue
- Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-06-16
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-97
- ISSN
- 0016-7223 (ISSN-L)
- 1903-2471
- OpenAlex
- W3036404170
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Högskolan Kristianstad Publikationer (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial ecosystems, systems approach, complex adaptive systems theory, business environment, system boundaries, self-government, relational dimension, system evolution, entrepreneurship theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review