Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH toolbox for neurological and behavioral function
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function assessment battery contains measures in the domains of cognitive function, motor function, sensory function, and emotional health. It was designed for use in epidemiological and clinical trials health-related research. DESIGN: This paper describes the first phase of instrument development for the stress and self-efficacy subdomain of emotional health. Based on an extensive literature review and expert consultation, 127 measures were initially considered for inclusion in this subdomain, including measures of stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and coping. RESULTS: Several measures, including emotion regulation and measures of coping strategies, did not meet criteria that were a priori established for inclusion. Psychometric properties of the remaining candidate measures were evaluated using data from five independent samples (combined N = 3175). Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses indicated the Perceived Stress Scale and the General Self-Efficacy Scale each assessed single dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on their psychometric performance, these two instruments were selected for inclusion and subsequent national norming for the NIH Toolbox.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
One General Self-Efficacy Scale item had a low corrected item-total correlation of .16 in children aged 8-12.
“One item had a low corrected item-total correlation (.16) in 8–12 year-olds: “If someone tries to keep me from getting what I want, I can find a way to get what I want.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The General Self-Efficacy Scale model also had good fit indices for adolescents, children aged 8-12 in self- and proxy-report, and ages 13-17.
“This model also had good fit indices for adolescents, ages 8–12 years (self- and proxy report) and 13–17 years of age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Perceived Stress Scale item #12 had low corrected item-total correlations across all groups.
“One item (item #12) had low corrected item-total correlations across all groups: “In the last month, how often have you found yourself thinking about things that you have to accomplish?””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Perceived Stress Scale item #12 had a low item-total correlation in all three pediatric samples.
“Item #12 had a low item-total correlation in all three pediatric samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across all age groups, internal consistency reliability was good for the Perceived Stress Scale according to Cronbach's alpha.
“Across all age groups, internal consistency reliability was good for the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) as indicated by Cronbach’s alpha (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Model fit analyses for emotion regulation and general coping measures were less successful than those for stress and self-efficacy.
“Model fit analyses of emotion regulation and general coping measures were less successful than those for stress and self-efficacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the remaining General Self-Efficacy Scale items, corrected item-total correlations were greater than .33 across all samples.
“For the rest of the items, corrected item-total correlations were greater than .33 across all of the samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The General Self-Efficacy Scale had high internal consistency for ages 8-12 in self- and proxy-report, ages 13-17, and ages 18 and older.
“As shown in Table 3, the General Self Efficacy Scale (GSES) had high internal consistency for ages 8–12 years (for both self- and proxy-report), 13–17 years, and 18 years and older.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adding the residual dependency resulted in a good-fitting one-factor model for the General Self-Efficacy Scale.
“This addition to the model resulted in a good-fitting one-factor model (see Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A bi-factor model with one group factor for positively keyed items and another for reverse-keyed items achieved good fit for the Perceived Stress Scale.
“For the PSS, we included one group factor for all positively keyed items and another group factor for reverse-keyed items; this model achieved good fit for the PSS (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the adult sample, a one-factor model did not fit the Perceived Stress Scale well, with CFI = 0.88 and RMSEA = .19.
“In the adult sample, a one-factor model did not fit the PSS well, CFI = 0.88, RMSEA = .19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The bi-factor model using scoring factors fit well in all three pediatric samples.
“Otherwise, the bi-factor model using scoring factors fit well in all three samples (see Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Consistent with past research, the Perceived Stress Scale and General Self-Efficacy Scale had good psychometric properties in dimensionality and precision of scores.
“Consistent with past research, the Perceived Stress Scale and the General Self-Efficacy Scale had good psychometric properties in terms of dimensionality and the precision of scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Among healthy individuals, stress can directly affect health through physiological and behavioral pathways.
“Among individuals who are well, stress can have a direct impact on health through its effects on physiological and behavioral functioning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Assessing Stress and Self-Efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function
Many existing measures of neurological and behavioral health are not used in large-scale epidemiological studies and clinical trials because they are costly, lengthy, restricted to particular age groups or populations, or hard to administer.
“Typically, however, such measures are not incorporated into large-scale epidemiological studies and clinical trials because they are expensive, lengthy, limited to certain age groups or populations, or not easily administered (Gershon et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gershon et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Stress and self-efficacy were not assessed for children aged 3-7 because of limited cognitive and emotional development and the difficulty for caregivers to speculate about children's perceptions.
“However, given the limited development of cognitive and emotional abilities for children ages 3–7 years and the inherent difficulty for parents or other caregivers to speculate on their children’s perceptions of stress and self-efficacy, we did not assess these concepts for this age group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is not conceptually feasible to derive a single summary score that adequately assesses the broad domain of coping.
“For example, unlike other emotional health concepts like social support or life satisfaction, it is not conceptually feasible to derive a single summary score that adequately assesses the broad domain of coping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
None of the emotion regulation or coping scales were included as Toolbox measures.
“Given the criteria for NIH Toolbox selection, as well the results of these analyses, none of these scales were able to be included as Toolbox measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The study was limited by its participant selection process.
“In addition to these methodological issues, the study was limited by the participant selection process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent work has shown that data collected from the Internet are comparable to data from probability-based general population samples.
“Recent work, however, has shown that data collected from the Internet are comparable to data from probability-based general population samples (Liu et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The scientific team has found that recruiting samples from Internet panels can be a cost-effective, efficient, and valid means of data collection, based on experience with two other large-scale NIH-funded efforts.
“In addition, our scientific team has found that recruiting samples from Internet panels can be a cost-effective, efficient, and valid means of data collection as evidenced by our experience with two other large-scale NIH-funded efforts (Cella et al., 2010; Gershon, R. et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cella et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gershon, R. et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the entire NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain, 554 measures were identified, and 127 were classified as potential measures of stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, or coping.
“For the entire NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain, 554 measures were identified, and of these, 127 were classified as potential measures of stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation or coping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPermission was granted to use 36 of the candidate measures.
“We were granted permission to use 36 of those measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenBased on the described procedures, perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and coping were initially considered the most important subdomains for building a Toolbox measurement strategy.
“Based on the procedures described below, perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation and coping were initially considered to be the most important subdomains upon which to build a Toolbox measurement strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningAfter review by project staff and emotion domain consultants, 44 measures were selected for further consideration.
“After review by project staff and emotion domain consultants, 44 measures were selected for further consideration based on criteria described earlier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningConsensus was reached that the four relevant constructs in the Stress and Self-Efficacy domain were Perceived Stress, Self-Efficacy, Emotion Regulation, and Coping.
“In the Stress and Self-Efficacy domain, consensus was reached that the four relevant constructs identified were Perceived Stress, Self-Efficacy, Emotion Regulation, and Coping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe short list included six measures of stressful events or perceived stress, three of self-efficacy, four of emotion regulation, and 31 of coping.
“The resulting short list included six measures that assessed stressful events or perceived stress, 3 that assessed self-efficacy, 4 that assessed emotion regulation and 31 that assessed coping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningOn the basis of a comprehensive literature review and extensive discussions, the NIH Toolbox emotional health team selected perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and coping as important constructs to evaluate for possible inclusion.
“On the basis of a comprehensive literature review and extensive discussions, the NIH Toolbox emotional health team selected perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation and coping as important constructs to be evaluated for possible inclusion in the NIH Toolbox.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRecruiting from an online research panel yielded samples that were predominantly White and had more years of education than population-based samples.
“First, by recruiting participants from an online research panel, we obtained samples that were predominantly White with more years of education relative to population-based samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPreliminary analyses of the Perceived Stress Scale suggested it measures a single dimension, although some variance was accounted for by item direction.
“The preliminary analyses of the Perceived Stress Scale suggested that it measures a single dimension, although there was some variance accounted for by the direction of the items (positively- versus negatively-keyed).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe first attempt to fit a one-factor model for the General Self-Efficacy Scale was unsuccessful, with acceptable CFI = .97 but RMSEA > .10.
“Our first attempt to fit a one-factor model was unsuccessful; CFI = .97 was acceptable, but RMSEA was >.10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA modification index indicated residual dependency between two General Self-Efficacy Scale items with similar content, so the model was refit.
“A modification index indicated a residual dependency between two items with similar content (see Table 3), so the model was refit to account for it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe five samples included adults aged 18+ (N=1111), adolescents aged 13-17 (N=512), children aged 8-12 for self-report (N=513), children aged 8-12 for proxy report (N=539), and children aged 3-7 for proxy report (N=500).
“These five samples were recruited based on age and consisted of adults aged 18 years and above (N= 1111), adolescents aged 13–17 years (N=512), and children aged 8–12 years (N= 513) for self-report forms; and children aged 8–12 years (N= 539) and children aged 3–7 years (N= 500) for parent/guardian proxy forms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFive community-dwelling internet panel samples were recruited for the initial testing wave, with a total N of 3,175.
“Five community-dwelling internet panel samples were recruited for the initial wave of testing (Total N=3,175).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor children, Cronbach's alpha for the Perceived Stress Scale was .89 for ages 13-17, .87 for ages 8-12, and .87 for the proxy-report version for ages 8-12.
“Cronbach’s alpha was .89 for 13–17 year-olds, .87 for 8–12 year-olds, and 0.87 for a proxy-report version of the PSS for 8–12 year-olds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Kidcope, CSCY, How I Feel-EC, Ways of Coping, Brief COPE, and CBQ had good reliability and validity by classic psychometric analyses but could not be fitted to a unidimensional confirmatory factor analysis model.
“The Kidcope, CSCY, How I Feel-EC, Ways of Coping, Brief COPE, and CBQ had good reliability and validity according to classic psychometric analyses, but could not be fitted to a unidimensional CFA model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStress is associated with risk of cardiovascular disease, immune dysfunction, and certain cancers through autonomic, vagal, cortisol, and immune mechanisms.
“It is related to risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, immune dysfunction, and certain cancers, through increased autonomic nervous system activity, poor vagal tone, chronically elevated blood cortisol levels, and decreased immunocompetence (Antoni et al., 2006; Cohen & Williamson, 1988; Raposa, Hammen, Brennan, O'Callaghan, & Najman, 2014; Steptoe & Kivimaki, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Antoni et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Raposa, Hammen, Brennan, O'Callaghan, & Najman, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Assessing Stress and Self-Efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral FunctionThe NIH Toolbox initiative was created to identify, develop when needed, and validate measures in cognitive, emotional, motor, and sensory domains for large-scale epidemiological studies.
“The NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIH Toolbox; nihtoolbox.org) initiative was developed to identify, create when necessary, and validate measures in the broad domains of cognitive function, emotional health, motor function, and sensory function for use large-scale epidemiological studies (Gershon, et al., 2010; Gershon, et al. 2013; Salsman, et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gershon, et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gershon, et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Salsman, et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe subjective experience of psychological stress is shaped by appraisal of an event's personal significance in relation to values, goals, and coping resources.
“The subjective experience of psychological stress is influenced by the individual’s appraisal of the personal significance of a given event in relation to his or her values and goals and options and resources for controlling the outcome (Folkman, 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Folkman, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPsychological stress occurs when a person perceives environmental or internal demands as personally threatening and beyond their perceived adaptive capacity.
“Psychological stress is experienced when an individual perceives environmental or internal demands that are personally threatening and exceed his or her perceived adaptive capacity (Cohen, Kessler, & Gordon, 1997; Folkman, 2010; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cohen, Kessler, & Gordon, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Folkman, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStress is relevant to disease and health, as shown in human and animal models.
“The relevance of stress to disease and health has been demonstrated in both human and animal models (Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007; Segerstrom and Miller, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Segerstrom and Miller, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Assessing Stress and Self-Efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral FunctionAdding neurological and behavioral function measures to large epidemiological studies could enhance understanding of how these factors relate to varied outcomes while being cost-effective and adding little participant burden.
“Including neurological and behavioral function measures in these large and expensive epidemiological studies could improve understanding of how neurological and behavioral health factors are related to diverse outcomes and do so cost-effectively and with minimal additional participant burden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Assessing Stress and Self-Efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral FunctionThe emotional health domain of the NIH Toolbox included four subdomains: Negative Affect, Positive Affect, Social Relationships, and Stress and Self-Efficacy.
“For example, the emotional health domain was comprised of four subdomains: Negative Affect, Positive Affect, Social Relationships, and Stress and Self-Efficacy subdomains, the latter of which is the focus of this paper.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nowinski, Victorson, Debb, & Gershon, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStress can reduce adherence to medication and medical recommendations and can increase health-damaging behavior.
“For example, stress can hamper adherence to medication and other medical recommendations, and it can lead to increases in health-damaging behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Segerstrom and Miller, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Ways of Coping Questionnaire is arguably the most widely used coping-strategy scale for adolescents and adults and is a 50-item Likert scale with eight empirically derived factors.
“The Ways of Coping Questionnaire (Folkman & Lazarus, 1988) is arguably the most widely used scale of coping strategies for adolescents and adults. It is a 50-item Likert scale with 8 empirically derived factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Folkman & Lazarus, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmong people with acute or chronic disease, coping is a key factor in how well they manage their health condition, and coping styles can influence whether they cope in healthy or health-destructive ways.
“Among individuals with acute or chronic diseases, coping is a key factor that can determine how well an individual conceptualizes and behaviorally manages a health condition, and ways of coping with stress can influence whether individuals cope in healthy or health-destructive ways (Carver & Vargas, 2011; Folkman, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Carver & Vargas, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Folkman, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDifficulties in regulating emotions are related to problems in psychological and physical functioning.
“Difficulties in regulating emotions have been related to problems in psychological and physical functioning (Appleton, Buka, Loucks, Gilman, & Kubzansky, 2013; Gross & Munoz, 1995; DeSteno, Gross & Kubzansky, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Appleton, Buka, Loucks, Gilman, & Kubzansky, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gross & Munoz, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DeSteno, Gross & Kubzansky, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe General Self-Efficacy Scale measures personal competence to deal effectively with a variety of stressful situations.
“It measures personal competence to deal effectively with a variety of stressful situations (Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCoping is defined as cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding one's resources.
“The most comprehensive and frequently-cited definition of coping was formulated by Lazarus and Folkman (1984): “cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external or internal demands (and conflicts between them) that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the resources of the person.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lazarus and Folkman (1984)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSecondary appraisal involves the degree to which one believes one can influence internal states, behavior, the environment, or desired outcomes.
“Secondary appraisal involves the extent to which one believes they can influence or affect their own internal states, their behavior, the environment, and/or desired outcomes (perceived control) (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Wallston, Wallston, Smith & Dobbins, 1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wallston, Wallston, Smith & Dobbins, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Brief Cope is a widely used coping scale with 28 items forming 14 two-item subscales and good psychometrics.
“Another widely used scale of coping strategies is the Brief Cope (Carver, 1997), a 28 item scale with 14 2-item subscales with good psychometrics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carver, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Children's Behavior Questionnaire is widely used in child development and behavior research and has excellent psychometric properties.
“The CBQ is a widely used measure of child development and behavior and has excellent psychometric properties ((Rothbart, Ahadi, Hershey, & Fisher, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rothbart, Ahadi, Hershey, & Fisher, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSelf-efficacy is the belief that one can respond to stressful demands and has direct and indirect effects on health, including health-related behavior.
“Not a measure of the stress level itself, self-efficacy involves the belief that one is able to respond to demands of a stressful situation and it has both direct and indirect effects on health, including engaging in health-related behaviors (Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe General Self-Efficacy Scale was identified to measure general self-efficacy.
“The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES; Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995) scale was identified to measure general self-efficacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEvaluating one's self-efficacy for implementing required strategies is an essential part of judging opportunities for personal control in a stressful situation.
“An essential component in judging opportunities for personal control in a stressful situation is the evaluation of one’s self- efficacy with respect to implementing the required strategies (Bandura, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bandura, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmotion regulation is a process for monitoring and managing emotional experience and expression and can be conscious or unconscious.
“Emotion regulation is a process by which a person can attempt to monitor and manage the experience and expression of their emotions and it can involve both conscious and unconscious processes (Gross & John, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gross & John, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Emotion Control Factor of the How I Feel measure is a 10-item scale with established good reliability and validity.
“The Emotion Control Factor of the How I Feel measure (Walden, Harris, & Catron, 2003) is a 10-item scale that has established good reliability and validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walden, Harris, & Catron, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Perceived Stress Scale is the most frequently used measure of subjective stress, including in health and quality-of-life studies, and has excellent reliability and validity.
“This scale is the most frequently used measure of a person’s subjective experience of stress, including studies of health and quality of life, and has excellent reliability and validity (Cohen & Williamson, 1988, Monroe, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Monroe, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe Perceived Stress Scale was selected for the perceived stress subdomain.
“For the subdomain of perceived stress, The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen, Kessler & Gordon, 1995) was selected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen, Kessler & Gordon, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe General Self-Efficacy Scale is a 10-item Likert scale with excellent reliability, stability, and validity, and has been used in many studies of health-related stress and behavior.
“It is a 10 item Likert scale and has excellent reliability, stability, and validity, and has been used in numerous studies related to health-related stress and behavior (Lusczynska, Gutierrez-Doña, & Schwarzer, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lusczynska, Gutierrez-Doña, & Schwarzer, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Kidcope has 10 items representing coping strategies, and the Coping Scale for Children and Youth has 29 items with good psychometric properties.
“For children and adolescents, two scales were initially considered: The Kidcope (Spirito, Stark & Williams, 1988), comprised of 10 items representing coping strategies and the Coping Scale for Children and Youth (CSCY) (Brodzinsky et al., 1992) comprised of 29 items with good psychometric properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Spirito, Stark & Williams, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brodzinsky et al., 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese emotion regulation and coping measures have good psychometric properties and remain useful for the constructs they represent, and were recommended as supplemental measures for research involving Toolbox measures.
“These measures have good psychometric properties, and, although they were not included as Toolbox measures, they remain useful measures of the constructs they represent and were recommended as supplemental measures for research involving Toolbox measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese findings are consistent with well-known complexities in assessing emotion regulation and coping.
“Although disappointing because of the conceptual importance attributed to these measures in this subdomain, these findings are consistent with well-known complexities that characterize their assessment (Bridges, Denham & Ganiban, 2004; Folkman, & Moskowitz, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bridges, Denham & Ganiban, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Folkman, & Moskowitz, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningItems were reviewed for relevance and use by older respondents, cultural sensitivity and conceptual appropriateness across cultural groups, and future Spanish translatability.
“Items were reviewed for relevance and use by older respondents (Geriatric Working Group), for cultural sensitivity and conceptual appropriateness across cultural groups (Cultural Working Group) and for Spanish translatability in the future (Spanish Language Working Group).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisenone givenA key conceptual problem is that the adaptiveness or maladaptiveness of coping is determined in relation to a specific context.
“The key conceptual problem is that the evaluation of the adaptiveness/maladaptiveness of coping is determined in relation to a specific context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA main reason these scales were not included was the lack of a single outcome score, as most were multidimensional and too lengthy for inclusion.
“One main reason was the lack of a single outcome score, as most were multidimensional measures and resulted in being too lengthy for inclusion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sample was purposive and designed with recruitment quotas for age, gender, and education.
“This was a purposive sample designed with recruitment quotas for age, gender, and education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Perceived Stress Scale authors also found a low factor loading for item 12 and three other items, reduced the scale to 10 items, and found the PSS10 reliability and validity equivalent to the PSS14.
“The scale authors (Cohen & Williamson, 1988) had also found a low factor loading for Item 12, as well as three other items and reduced the items to 10 (the PSS10). Their psychometric analyses found reliability and validity to be equivalent to the PSS14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningItem response theory was not recommended for scoring because the measures had sufficient psychometric properties and using them as-is would preserve continuity with existing literature.
“Because measures in this subdomain had sufficient psychometric properties, item response theory was not recommended for scoring because using the measures “as is” would allow for continuity with the extant literature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe Perceived Stress Scale and General Self-Efficacy Scale were deemed appropriate for inclusion in the Stress and Self-Efficacy subdomain of the NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain.
“Thus, these measures were deemed as appropriate for inclusion in this subdomain of the NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause of these challenges and the constraints of the NIH Toolbox, the emotion regulation and coping measures were judged unsuitable for the project, which may be a limitation of the NIH Toolbox.
“Because of these challenges and the constraints of the NIH Toolbox, these measures were judged unsuitable for this project, which may be a limitation of the NIH Toolbox.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe measures judged most appropriate for NIH Toolbox purposes are widely used, psychometrically sound, and brief.
“Thus, the measures that were judged most appropriate for NIH Toolbox purposes are widely used, psychometrically sound, and brief.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis may be evidence of participation bias, which is often unavoidable in volunteer research.
“This may be evidence of a participation bias which is often unavoidable in volunteer research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA key methodological problem is that coping is multidimensional, with no agreement on the number of dimensions or a gold-standard classification system.
“The key methodological problem is that coping is multi-dimensional with no agreement about the number of dimensions or a gold standard classification system (Skinner, Edge, Altman, & Sherwood, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Skinner, Edge, Altman, & Sherwood, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAll items were reviewed by expert panels to identify and address potential assessment issues in special subgroups.
“As part of the NIH Toolbox project, all items were also reviewed by expert panels to identify and address potential issues related to assessment in special subgroups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataAfter the analyses, the authors decided to recommend the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale for the Toolbox.
“After this analysis, we decided to recommend the PSS10 for the Toolbox.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Based on our psychometric results, which were similar to those of the authors (Cohen & Williamson, 1988), we decided to recommend the 10-item version.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPotential participants underwent rigorous screening that included validation of internet protocol addresses to prevent fraudulent survey participation.
“Potential participants completed a rigorous screening process to determine their eligibility, which included validation of their internet protocol addresses to ensure that they were not fraudulently participating in surveys..”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For our CFAs, we assessed model fit using the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990; Hu & Bentler, 1999) and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Browne, Cudeck, Bollen, & Long, 1993) to assess the fit of each model.”
MethodSelf-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835 · see citing works
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,026 · see citing works
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For our CFAs, we assessed model fit using the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990; Hu & Bentler, 1999) and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Browne, Cudeck, Bollen, & Long, 1993) to assess the fit of each model.”
MethodSelf-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,409 · see citing works
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Emotion regulation is a process by which a person can attempt to monitor and manage the experience and expression of their emotions and it can involve both conscious and unconscious processes (Gross & John, 2003).”
BackgroundYou want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief cope
Carver, C. S. (1997) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6 · Cited by 7,361 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another widely used scale of coping strategies is the Brief Cope (Carver, 1997), a 28-item scale with 14 2-item subscales with good psychometrics.”
MethodMarsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 · Cited by 6,691 · see citing works
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · Cited by 5,128 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, our scientific team has found that recruiting samples from Internet panels can be a cost-effective, efficient, and valid means of data collection as evidenced by our experience with two other large-scale NIH-funded efforts (Cella et al., 2010; Gershon et al., 2012).”
Self-citation(2000) · Cited by 4,106 · see citing works
Journal of Statistical Software
de Leeuw, J. (2009) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.10 · Cited by 3,608 · see citing works
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456 · Cited by 3,485 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Although disappointing because of the conceptual importance attributed to these measures in this subdomain, these findings are consistent with well-known complexities that characterize their assessment (Bridges, Denham, & Ganiban, 2004; Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationFundamentals of item response theory
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4185 · Cited by 3,417 · see citing works
Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 Years of inquiry
Segerstrom, S. C., & Miller, G. E. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.601 · Cited by 3,334 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The relevance of stress to disease and health has been demonstrated in both human and animal models (Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007; Segerstrom & Miller, 2004).”
BackgroundPsychological Stress and Disease
Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.14.1685 · Cited by 3,168 · see citing works
Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis.
Folkman, S. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.839 · Cited by 2,807 · see citing works
Self-citationSkinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216 · Cited by 2,639 · see citing works
Investigations of Temperament at Three to Seven Years: The Children's Behavior Questionnaire
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K. L., & Fisher, P. A. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00355 · Cited by 2,424 · see citing works
Cole, P. M., Martin, S. E., & Dennis, T. A. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00673.x · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis.
Folkman, S. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839 · Cited by 1,936 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The most comprehensive and frequently cited definition of coping was formulated by Lazarus and Folkman (1984): “cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external or internal demands (and conflicts between them) that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the resources of the person.””
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe social psychology of health
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-5686 · Cited by 1,797 · see citing works
Emotion regulation and mental health
Gross, J. J., & Muñoz, R. F. (1995) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1995.tb00036.x · Cited by 1,595 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Difficulties in regulating emotions have been related to problems in psychological and physical functioning (Appleton, Buka, Loucks, Gilman, & Kubzansky, 2013; Gross & Munoz, 1995; DeSteno, Gross, & Kubzansky, 2013).”
BackgroundStress and cardiovascular disease
Steptoe, A., & Kivimäki, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2012.45 · Cited by 1,321 · see citing works
Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio
Johnston, M., Wright, S., & Weinman, J. A. (1995) · Cited by 1,300 · see citing works
Vision assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Varma, R., McKean‐Cowdin, R., Vitale, S., Slotkin, J., & Hays, R. D. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182876e0a · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: evidence from five countries
Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez‐Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207590444000041 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms
Antoni, M. H., Lutgendorf, S. K., Cole, S. W., Dhabhar, F. S., Sephton, S. E., McDonald, P. G., Stefanek, M., & Sood, A. K. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1820 · Cited by 981 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…and certain cancers, through increased autonomic nervous system activity, poor vagal tone, chronically elevated blood cortisol levels, and decreased immunocompetence (Antoni et al., 2006; Cohen & Williamson, 1988; Raposa, Hammen, Brennan, O’ Callaghan, & Najman, 2014; Steptoe & Kivimäki, 2012).”
BackgroundA validity and reliability study of the coping self‐efficacy scale
Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910705x53155 · Cited by 942 · see citing works
Self-citationNIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function
Gershon, R. C., Wagster, M. V., Hendrie, H. C., Fox, N. A., Cook, K. F., & Nowinski, C. J. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872e5f · Cited by 895 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…the initial phase included acceptable psychometric properties, including reliability, validity, availability of normative data, ability to use or be adapted across the lifespan, suitability for diverse populations, and versatility and portability in terms of types of studies (Gershon et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStrategies for Measuring Stress in Studies of Psychiatric and Physical Disorders
Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195086416.003.0001 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02287965 · Cited by 771 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Because the PSS has some reversed-scored items, we suspected the presence of scoring factors, so we refit the model using a bifactor approach (Holzinger & Swineford, 1937), in which one general factor is included along with one or more group factors to model local dependence.”
MethodChoi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v039.i08 · Cited by 756 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We then examined each item across these groups using lordif – an algorithm developed by Choi, Gibbons, and Crane (2011) and implemented in the R statistical environment (see http:// www.r-project.org/).”
MethodMeasuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists
Deary, I. J. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(96)00066-9 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations.
Spirito, A., Stark, L. J., & Williams, C. (1988) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/13.4.555 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Modern Approaches to Conceptualizing and Measuring Human Life Stress
Monroe, S. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141207 · Cited by 567 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This scale is the most frequently used measure of a person’s subjective experience of stress, including studies of health and quality of life, and has excellent reliability and validity (Cohen & Williamson, 1988; Monroe, 2008).”
MethodFolkman, S. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1836 · Cited by 496 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…acute or chronic diseases, coping is a key factor that can determine how well an individual conceptualizes and behaviorally manages a health condition, and ways of coping with stress can influence whether individuals cope in healthy or health-destructive ways (Carver & Vargas, 2011; Folkman, 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Guthrie, I. K. (1997) · Issues in clinical child psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2677-0_2 · Cited by 475 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Eisenberg, Fabes, and Guthrie (1997) used the term “self-regulation” to include both regulation of internal states and emotion-related behaviors.”
BackgroundFolkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t06501-000 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Self-citationRepresentativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel
Liu, H., Cella, D. F., Gershon, R. C., Shen, J., Morales, L. S., Riley, W. T., & Hays, R. D. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.021 · Cited by 447 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent work, however, has shown that data collected from the Internet are comparable to data from probability-based general population samples (Liu et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., Smith, S., & Dobbins, C. J. (1987) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02686633 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Affective science and health: The importance of emotion and emotion regulation.
DeSteno, D. A., Gross, J. J., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2013) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030259 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Assessment of neurological and behavioural function: the NIH Toolbox
Gershon, R. C., Cella, D., Fox, N. A., Havlik, R. J., Hendrie, H. C., & Wagster, M. V. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70335-7 · Cited by 377 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…initiative was developed to identify, create when necessary, and validate measures in the broad domains of cognitive function, emotional health, motor function, and sensory function for use large-scale epidemiological studies (Gershon et al., 2010; Gershon, et al. 2013; Salsman, et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationGershon, R. C., Lai, J. S., Bode, R. K., Choi, S. W., Moy, C. S., Bleck, T., Miller, D. M., Peterman, A. H., & Cella, D. F. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9958-8 · Cited by 361 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, our scientific team has found that recruiting samples from Internet panels can be a cost-effective, efficient, and valid means of data collection as evidenced by our experience with two other large-scale NIH-funded efforts (Cella et al., 2010; Gershon et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBenight, C. C., & Harper, M. L. (2002) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1023/a:1015295025950 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Definitional issues in emotion regulation research
Bridges, L. J., Denham, S. A., & Ganiban, J. M. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00675.x · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Emotion assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Salsman, J. M., Butt, Z. A., Pilkonis, P. A., Cyranowski, J. M., Zill, N., Hendrie, H. C., Kupst, M. J., Kelly, M. A. R., Bode, R. K., Choi, S. W., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872e11 · Cited by 274 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A final criterion was that measures for each of the Emotional Health domains had to be brief enough so that respondents could complete the total emotion domain battery within 30 minutes (Gershon et al., 2010; Salsman et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationCarver, C. S., & Vargas, S. E. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.013.0008 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Coping scale for children and youth: Scale development and validation
Brodzinsky, D. M., Elias, M. J., Steiger, C., Simon, J., Gill, M., & Hitt, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0193-3973(92)90029-h · Cited by 162 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For children and adolescents, two scales were initially considered: the Kidcope (Spirito, Stark, & Williams, 1988), comprised of 10 items representing coping strategies and the Coping Scale for Children and Youth (CSCY) (Brodzinsky et al., 1992) comprised of 29 items with good psychometric properties.”
MethodInfluentialDivergent associations of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies with inflammation
Appleton, A. A., Buka, S. L., Loucks, E. B., Gilman, S. E., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2013) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030068 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
How I Feel: A Self-Report Measure of Emotional Arousal and Regulation for Children.
Walden, T. A., Harris, V. S., & Catron, T. F. (2003) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.399 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Early adversity and health outcomes in young adulthood: The role of ongoing stress.
Raposa, E. B., Hammen, C. L., Brennan, P. A., O’Callaghan, F., & Najman, J. M. (2013) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032752 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Using the NIH Toolbox in special populations
Victorson, D. E., Manly, J. J., Wallner‐Allen, K., Fox, N. A., Purnell, C., Hendrie, H. C., Havlik, R. J., Harniss, M. K., Magasi, S. R., Correia, H., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872e26 · Cited by 44 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Recognizing the challenges in pediatric assessment the Pediatric consultant subgroup provided guidance in measurement selection and administration (Victorson et al., 2013).”
BackgroundBuilding PROMIS item banks: librarians as co-investigators
Klem, M. L., Saghafi, E. M., Abromitis, R. A., Stover, A. M., Dew, M. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9498-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Input on NIH Toolbox inclusion criteria
Nowinski, C. J., Victorson, D. E., Debb, S. M., & Gershon, R. C. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872e4c · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“An NIH Toolbox Request for Information from experts in the field (Nowinski et al., 2013) was followed by consultation with an international group of content experts.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Browne M. W., 1993, Alternative ways of assessing model fit testing structural equation models
- Schwarzer R., 2008, Health Behavior Constructs: Theory, Measurement and Research
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harris, K. M., Gaffey, A. E., Schwartz, J. E., Krantz, D. S., & Burg, M. M. (2023) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaad015 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Mozaffarian, D., Agarwal, M., Aggarwal, M., Alexander, L., Apovian, C. M., Bindlish, S., Bonnet, J., Butsch, W. S., Christensen, S., Gianos, E., et al. (2025) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.023 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“Alternatively, setting an absolute protein target of 80 – 120 g/day may enhance adherence while ensuring adequate intake.”
Bevans, K. B., Gardner, W. P., PAJER, K. A., Becker, B. D., Carle, A. C., Tucker, C. A., & Forrest, C. B. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsy010 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Mozaffarian, D., Agarwal, M., Aggarwal, M., Alexander, L., Apovian, C. M., Bindlish, S., Bonnet, J., Butsch, W. S., Christensen, S., Gianos, E., et al. (2025) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.24336 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“Individuals who report high levels of stress on a Perceived Stress Scale 10-item questionnaire [193] or a brief Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety [194] may particularly benefit from stress mitigation interventions.”
Salsman, J. M., Schalet, B. D., Merluzzi, T. V., Park, C. L., Hahn, E. A., Snyder, M. A., & Cella, D. F. (2019) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02198-6 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“Similarly, convergent validity correlations with related constructs such as optimism and positive expectancies were large and in the expected direction [45, 46], and the PROMIS General Self-Efficacy measures were highly correlated with the Toolbox version of the same construct [20], suggesting comparable approaches to…”
Self-citationHolmes, L. G., Zampella, C., Clements, C. C., McCleery, J. P., Maddox, B. B., Parish‐Morris, J., Udhnani, M. D., Schultz, R. T., & Miller, J. S. (2020) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2275 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“, 2014], general self-efficacy [Kupst et al., 2015], cognitive functioning [Lai, Wagner, Jacobsen, & Cella, 2014], sleep disturbance and impairment [Buysse et al.”
BackgroundValidation of the NIH Toolbox in Individuals with Neurologic Disorders
Carlozzi, N. E., Goodnight, S. M., Casaletto, K. B., Goldsmith, A., Heaton, R. K., Wong, A., Baum, C. M., Gershon, R. C., Heinemann, A. W., & Tulsky, D. S. (2017) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acx020 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Eick, S. M., Enright, E. A., Geiger, S. D., Dzwilewski, K. L. C., DeMicco, E., Smith, S. C., Park, J.-S., Aguiar, A., Woodruff, T. J., Morello-Frosch, R. A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020742 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Perceived stress was harmonized by converting the PSS-4 and PSS-10 to T-scores using the NIH toolbox [38].”
MethodInfluentialTargeting self-regulation to promote health behaviors in children
Miller, A. L., Gearhardt, A. N., Fredericks, E. M., Katz, B., Shapiro, L. F., Holden, K., Kaciroti, N., Gonzalez, R., Hunter, C. M., & Lumeng, J. C. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.008 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“The NIH Toolbox Self-Efficacy questionnaire, validated for 8-12 year-old children (Kupst et al., 2015), assesses belief in one’s capacity to manage and have control over meaningful events (e.g., “I can manage to solve difficult problems if I try hard enough”).”
MethodEick, S. M., Enright, E. A., Padula, A. M., Aung, M. T., Geiger, S. D., Cushing, L. J., Trowbridge, J., Keil, A. P., Baek, H.-G., Smith, S. C., et al. (2022) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107238 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“This method is described in detail elsewhere (Kupst et al., 2015).”
MethodWilliams, J. R., Cole, V. T., Girdler, S. S., & Cromeens, M. G. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233185 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“It is also important to note that this study used a self-report measure of perceived stress during the past month as an indicator of a person’s adaptive capacity overload [66].”
BackgroundShomaker, L. B., Berman, Z., Burke, M., Annameier, S. K., Pivarunas, B., Sánchez, N., Smith, A. D., Hendrich, S. G., Riggs, N. R., Legget, K. T., et al. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.022 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CHD care and emotional wellbeing
Cousino, M. K., Pasquali, S. K., Romano, J. C., Norris, M. D., Yu, S., Reichle, G., Lowery, R., Viers, S., & Schumacher, K. R. (2020) · Cardiology in the Young · doi:10.1017/s1047951120004758 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“In addition, the eight-item parent-reported NIH PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences Scale 10 and 10-item self-reported NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale 11,12 were administered as validated measures of general life stress.”
Shahane, A. D., Lopez, R. B., & Denny, B. T. (2018) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-00676-x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“In addition, the perceived stress measure used in the present study has been shown to reliably predict and/or reflect stress in normative populations (Kupst et al., 2015).”
MethodZhu, X., Wang, K., Chen, L., Cao, A., Chen, Q., Li, J., & Qiu, J. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.05.018 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Mozaffarian, D., Agarwal, M., Aggarwal, M., Alexander, L., Apovian, C. M., Bindlish, S., Bonnet, J., Butsch, W. S., Christensen, S., Gianos, E., et al. (2025) · Obesity Pillars · doi:10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100181 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Coping and Adaptation in Pediatric Cancer: Current Perspectives
Kupst, M. J., & Patenaude, A. F. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21374-3_5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationJelsma, E. B., Goosby, B. J., & Cheadle, J. E. (2021) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13763 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Mendelson, T., Clary, L. K., Sibinga, E., Tandon, D., Musci, R., Mmari, K., Salkever, D., Stuart, E. A., & Ialongo, N. (2020) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2019.105895 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Zaheed, A. B., Sharifian, N., Kraal, A. Z., Sol, K., Manly, J. J., Schupf, N., Brickman, A. M., & Zahodne, L. B. (2020) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617720001253 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Perceived stress was measured using the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Survey (Kupst et al., 2015; Salsman et al., 2013), a 10-item version of the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983), which has been demonstrated to have good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .91) and concordance with objective measures of…”
MethodWhite, S. W., Brewe, A. M., & Powell, N. P. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/70137 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“The GSES has shown strong internal consistency and convergent validity [40,41].”
Foy, J. G., & Foy, M. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00158 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mozaffarian, D., Agarwal, M., Aggarwal, M., Alexander, L., Apovian, C. M., Bindlish, S., Bonnet, J. P., Butsch, W. S., Christensen, S. M., Gianos, E., et al. (2025) · Obesity Pillars · doi:10.1016/j.obpill.2026.100269 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Hammond, T. C., Powell, E. S., Green, S. J., Chlipala, G. E., Frank, J. A., Yackzan, A. T., Yanckello, L. M., Chang, Y., Xing, X., Heil, S. D., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.1017180 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Wulsin, L. R., Henson, S. J. S., Roos, L. G., Wang, D., Jenkins, B. N., Cohen, B. E., Shah, A. J., & Slavich, G. M. (2022) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000001051 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Yoo, H. J., Nashiro, K., Min, J., Cho, C., Mercer, N., Bachman, S. L., Nasseri, P., Dutt, S., Porat, S., Choi, P., et al. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02396-5 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Johnson, H. M., Sullivan-Vedder, L., Kim, K., McBride, P. E., Smith, M. A., LaMantia, J. N., Fink, J. T., Sinaise, M. R. K., Zeller, L. M., & Lauver, D. (2019) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2019.01.010 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“, perceived self-efficacy [51, 52]; confidence in starting and maintaining behaviors to reach a goal) [50, 53–59].”
BackgroundImpact of a Genetic Diagnosis for a Child’s Autism on Parental Perceptions
Wynn, J., Karlsen, A., Huber, B. D., Levine, A., Salem, A. M., White, L. C., Luby, M., Bezborodko, E., Xiao, S., Chung, W. K., et al. (2024) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-024-06273-x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“At one-month follow-up, optimism, self-esteem, self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in one’s own ability; Kupst et al., 2015) and autism stigma were not significantly different from baseline for either group (Table S3).”
Liebe, R. A., Adams, L. M., Hedrick, V. E., Serrano, E. L., Porter, K., Cook, N. E., & Misyak, S. A. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14071491 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“More than half of all respondents were experiencing a high level of perceived stress, which is severe enough to potentially necessitate clinical intervention [39].”
BackgroundMethodA Pilot Study of Cognition Among Hypoparathyroid Adults
Rubin, M. R., Tabacco, G., Omeragic, B., Majeed, R., Hale, C., & Brickman, A. M. (2022) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvac002 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Duration of hypoparathyroidism, years 5 (2-10) [1-39]”
BackgroundSmith, A. D., Sanchez, N., Reynolds, C., Casamassima, M., Verros, M., Annameier, S. K., Melby, C., Johnson, S. A., Lucas-Thompson, R. G., & Shomaker, L. B. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104715 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“—We measured and accounted for adolescents’ perceptions of general stress using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen & Williamson, 1988; Kupst et al., 2015).”
MethodMa, L., Steinberg, J. L., Bjork, J. M., Wang, Q., Hettema, J. M., Abbate, A., & Moeller, F. G. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.013 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Burkhouse, K. L., Dao, A., Argiros, A. P., Granros, M., Cárdenas, E. F., Dickey, L., Feurer, C., Hill, K. E., Pegg, S. L., Venanzi, L., et al. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104384 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Peterson, B. S., West, A. E., Weisz, J. R., Mack, W. J., Kipke, M. D., Findling, R. L., Mittman, B. S., Bansal, R., Piantadosi, S., Takata, G., et al. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03314-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Self-Efficacy NIH Toolbox Self-Efficacy [93] C,P 7–17 10 .”
Bernstein, R. M., Sánchez, N., Clark, E. L. M., Conte, I., Gulley, L. D., Legget, K. T., Cornier, M., Melby, C. L., Johnson, S. A., Lucas‐Thompson, R. G., et al. (2021) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101580 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Guo, Y., Wu, H., Dong, D., Zhou, F., Li, Z., Zhao, L., & Long, Z. (2022) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100511 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“The perceived stress scale in the NIH toolbox consists of 10 items to measure the degree of stress a person feels during the last month (Kupst et al., 2015).”
MethodMulligan, J., Olivieri, H., Young, K., Lin, J., & Anthony, S. J. (2022) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-022-00495-6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The NIHSE has shown strong psychometric properties in the areas of dimensionality and precision of scores [22].”
MethodBlackwell, C. K., Sherlock, P., Jackson, K., Hofheimer, J. A., Cella, D. F., Algermissen, M., Alshawabkeh, A. N., Avalos, L. A., Bastain, T., Blair, C., et al. (2023) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0001211 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationKrok, D., Telka, E., & Zarzycka, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19159631 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The lack of moderation effects does not necessarily invalidate earlier cross-sectional findings, as it seems feasible that the previous studies described more correlational mechanisms in their samples, or that the relationships may change over time due to potential fluctuations in total pain experiences and ensuing st…”
ResultMount, K. B., Elliott, S. C., Hynan, L. S., Warren, B. A., & Jarrett, R. B. (2021) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05113-6 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“, 2013), or defined by “a person’s self-report of adaptive capacity overload” (Kupst et al., 2015).”
BackgroundSalsman, J. M., Park, C. L., Hahn, E. A., Snyder, M. A., George, L. S., Steger, M. F., Merluzzi, T. V., & Cella, D. F. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1896-2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Participants reviewed items from the NIH Toolbox’s Positive Affect, General Life Satisfaction, Meaning & Purpose, and General Self-Efficacy Item Banks [16, 22].”
MethodSelf-citationThe Relationship Between Personality Traits and Well-Being via Brain Functional Connectivity
Li, L., Li, L. M. W., Ma, J., Lu, A., & Dai, Z. (2023) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-023-00674-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Son, E. H., Wallen, G. R., Flynn, S. L., Yang, L., & Lee, L. J. (2023) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6145 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Subjective, neuropsychological, and neural markers of memory in older adults
Sheffler, J., Meynadasy, M. A., Taylor, D. T., Kiosses, D. N., & Hajcak, G. (2021) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610221002623 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Perceived stress was measured using the NIH Toolbox Emotion Battery (Kupst et al., 2015).”
MethodWei, X., McKinlay, C. J. D., Harding, J. E., Wouldes, T. A., Rogers, J., Brown, G., & Franke, N. (2024) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2024.2447444 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Evidence of moderate quality from three studies (5,496 children) showed the NAf, PWB, SSE and SR are separate constructs, especially in older children (Supplementary Table S19) (Kupst et al., 2015; Paolillo et al., 2020; Salsman et al., 2013).”
Zhang, M., Ho, E., Nowinski, C. J., Fox, R. S., Aytürk, E., Karpouzian‐Rogers, T., Novack, M. A., Dodge, H. H., Weıntraub, S., & Gershon, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/08982643231199806 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…good reliability (Cronbach α s ranging from .90 to .98 across scales) and acceptable convergent validity (correlation coef fi cients ranging from .60 to .92 across scales) among adult participants in prior literature (Kupst et al., 2015; Pilkonis et al., 2013; Salsman et al., 2013, 2014).”
Babakhanyan, I., Carlozzi, N. E., McKenna, B. S., Casaletto, K. B., Heinemann, A. W., & Heaton, R. K. (2019) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.024 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lo, S. L., Gearhardt, A. N., Fredericks, E. M., Katz, B., Sturza, J. S., Kaciroti, N., Gonzalez, R., Hunter, C. M., Sonneville, K. R., Chaudhry, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105157 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Leininger, B. D., Evans, R., Greco, C. M., Hanson, L., Schulz, C. A., Schneider, M. H., Connett, J. E., Keefe, F. J., Glick, R. M., & Brønfort, G. (2025) · Chiropractic & Manual Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12998-025-00570-7 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cragoe, N. G., Sprowles, J. L. N., Eick, S. M., Harvey, L., Ramirez, X. R., Sugg, G. A., Morello-Frosch, R. A., Woodruff, T. J., & Schantz, S. L. (2025) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2025.107431 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Measures of perceived stress were harmonized by converting PSS scores to t-scores using the NIH toolbox method (Kupst et al., 2015).”
Kuzu, D., Kallen, M. A., & Kratz, A. L. (2023) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.002 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Measurement Properties of Patient Reported Outcome Scales: A Systematic Review
Stallwood, E., Elsman, E. B. M., Monsour, A., Baba, A., Butcher, N. J., & Offringa, M. (2023) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2023-061489 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sun, J., Yao, K., Zhao, R., Li, H., & Cicchella, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613384 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Measures of Patient Activation and Self‐Efficacy
Hamilton, C. B., & LI, L. C. (2020) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24350 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Adamowicz, J. L., Grant, A. D., Calvert, C., Elchert, D. M., Hadlandsmyth, K., Driscoll, M., Taylor, S. L., Allen, K. D., Taylor, B. C., & Burgess, D. J. (2025) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.70125 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Survey (PSS) (Kupst et al. 2015) was used to assess perceived stress.”
InfluentialJelsma, E. B., Zhang, A., Goosby, B. J., & Cheadle, J. E. (2024) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14597 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Berg, K. L., Mihaila, I., Feinstein, R. T., Shiu, C. A., Gussin, H. A., Acharya, K., Gladstone, T. R. G., Bernard, L., Best, M., Renz, E., et al. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107374 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Thornton, C. P., Perrin, N., Kozachik, S., Lukkahatai, N., & Ruble, K. (2023) · Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology · doi:10.1089/jayao.2022.0067 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Palatnik, A., Saffian, E., Flynn, K. E., Pan, A., Yee, L. M., Basir, M., & Cruz, M. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107237 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Liebe, R. A., Adams, L. M., Hedrick, V. E., Serrano, E. L., Porter, K., Cook, N. E., & Misyak, S. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.1078811 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Perceived stress over the past month was measured with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Perceived Stress—Adults tool (Kupst et al., 2015).”
MethodFeasibility of an Online Langerian Mindfulness Program for Stroke Survivors and Caregivers
Demers, M., Pagnini, F., Phillips, D., Chang, B., Winstein, C. J., & Langer, E. J. (2022) · OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/15394492221091266 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“For caregivers, the self-reported measures were (a) World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF; World Health Organization, 2004), (b) HADS, (c) Zarit Burden Interview (Zarit et al., 1980), (d) PSS, and (e) SQS (see Supplementary Material for a description of each measure).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSomatosensation Differences in Older Adults with and Without Diabetes, and by Age Group
Kim, Y. J., Rogers, J. C., Kwok, G., et al. (2016) · Occupational Therapy In Health Care · doi:10.3109/07380577.2015.1136758 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Geiger, S. D., Chandran, A., Churchill, M. L., Mansolf, M. A., Zhang, C., Musaad, S. M. A., Blackwell, C. K., Eick, S. M., Goin, D. E., Korrick, S., et al. (2024) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03542-4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationBurgess, D. J., Campbell, E. H., Branson, M., Calvert, C., Evans, R., Allen, K. D., Bangerter, A. K., Cross, L. J. S., Driscoll, M., Hennessy, S., et al. (2024) · Women s Health Reports · doi:10.1089/whr.2023.0086 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A true score imputation method to account for psychometric measurement error.
Mansolf, M. A. (2023) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000578 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Dworkin, J., Cai, Q., LeBouef, S., & Hruska, E. (2023) · Journal of Comparative Family Studies · doi:10.3138/jcfs.53.4.040 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Parental Stress Parent stress was measured using the 10-item NIH Toolbox – Perceived Stress Fixed Form Age 18+ (Version 2.0; Kupst et al., 2015), for example, “How often have you been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly?” Parents responded using a Likert-type scale ranging from 1= Never to 5=Very Oft…”
MethodInfluentialA True Score Imputation Method to Account for Psychometric Measurement ErrorPreprint
Mansolf, M. A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vzqys · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Multi-level health indicators as predictors of students’ subjective well-being experience
Korjova, E., Veselova, E. K., & Валерьевна, Р. О. (2022) · Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Psychology · doi:10.21638/spbu16.2022.405 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Anderson, S. R., Witkin, J. E., Bolt, T., Llabre, M. M., Ashton-James, C. E., & Losin, E. A. R. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107766 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The Perceived Stress Survey is a CAT-administered measure of how unpredictable, uncontrollable and overloaded participants feel about their lives over the past month (Kupst et al., 2015).”
BackgroundGreywoode, R., Philippou, A., Ullman, T., & Keefer, L. (2025) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1093/ibd/izaf145 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kourmousi, N., Kounenou, K., Pezirkianidis, C., Kalamatianos, A., & Chrousos, G. P. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14060344 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Psychological flexibility in art therapy: Practice-based research
Potash, J. S., Tripp, T., & Baxter, C. (2024) · The Arts in Psychotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.aip.2024.102244 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liebe, R. A., Holmes, C., & Misyak, S. A. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16101522 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Perceived Stress adults scale was used to assess perceived stress over the previous 30 days [34].”
MethodHu, Y., Russell, B. S., Wu, R., Adamsons, K. L., Horton, A. L., & Tambling, R. R. (2024) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x241236559 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Cronbach ’ s alpha reported from a sample of parents of children as young as eight years of age was acceptable ( α = .87; Kupst et al., 2015), as it was in the current sample ( α = .86 for baseline and .87 for follow-up).”
Yoo, H. J., Nashiro, K., Min, J., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.12.28.22283798 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Thornton, C. P., Kozachik, S., & Ruble, K. (2022) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000599 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“These instruments were chosen due to brevity, ease of completion, and established validity and reliability in children and adults (Hodes et al., 2013; Kupst et al., 2015; Victorson et al., 2013).”
BackgroundAkard, T. F., Davis, K. A., Hills, T., Lense, M. D., Kim, D., Webber, R., Dietrich, M. S., & Gilmer, M. J. (2021) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100765 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tan, K., Santacroce, S. J., Wood, W. A., Mayer, D. K., Junior, H. P. D. O. S., Mucha, P. J., Schwartz, T. A., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14742 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Reponses are summed for a total score; higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress (Kupst et al., 2015).”
BackgroundEick, S. M., Brennan, P. A., Buckley, J. P., Liang, D., Li, X., Karvonen, K. L., Cowell, W., Zhu, Y., Barrett, E. S., Peterson, A. K., et al. (2026) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127441 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Cho, E., Gilmer, M. J., Dietrich, M. S., et al. (2025) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2025.10.002 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sheng, J., Heiney, S. P., Wickersham, K. E., Nguyen, L. A., Harrison, K. W., & Adams, S. A. (2025) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/jrh.70028 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“30 The PSScontains10items,withresponsecategoriesrangingfromnever(1) toveryoften(5).”
The Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management Program: A Pilot
Kraus, B., & Wolf, T. (2024) · OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/15394492241271173 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Participants responded to the General Self-Efficacy (GSE) scale (Kupst et al., 2015), where higher scores ranging from 1 to 4 indicate increased feelings of self-efficacy.”
Mansolf, M. A., Blackwell, C. K., Lai, J., & Cella, D. F. (2023) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0001256 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationYerger, J., Cárdenas, E. F., Granros, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/10445463261459344 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Desai, A., Rau, J., Samora, J., Mccormick, K., Rochani, H., Chang, P., Westphal, R. J., Watson, P. J., Benzer, J., Claborn, K., et al. (2026) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-026-27343-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…on well-being to include 1) social support (emotional and informational support, 2) burnout, 3) job-related affective well-being, 4) secondary traumatic stress, 5) coping strategies, 6) general self-efficacy to handle stressful situations, 7) work engagement, and 8) turnover intention [30–38].”
Alvarez-Ambrosio, M., Chausa, P., Moreno-Blanco, D., Roca‐Ventura, A., García, I. O., Cattaneo, G., González, P. S., Sánchez, J. S., & Gómez, E. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1710891 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mawson, C., Carroll, A. M., Evas, S., Spies, S. J., & Fuad, M. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18020342 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Scores on the PSS range from 0 to 40, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived stress [19,20].”
Ильинична, Г. Л., Balanova, Y. А., Shalnova, S. A., Ivlev, O. E., Kutsenko, V. A., Drozdova, L. Y., Ivanova, E. S., Васильевна, К. А., & Drapkina, O. M. (2025) · Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.17116/profmed20252812160 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Modica, C. A., & Bailey, K. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2594151 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The 10-item PSS has evidenced both a two-factor structure (Franke F € oyen et al., 2024), and a one-factor structure (Kupst et al., 2015; Pretorius, 2023), and also invariance across gender (Lavoie & Douglas, 2012).”
InfluentialBrando, S. I. C. A., Goulart, V. D. L. R., Buchanan‐Smith, H. M., Rey, S., & Caes, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1677195 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ingram, K. M., Glock, R., Williamson, L., Coffey, A., Anctil, R., Augustinovic, A., Yang, D., Victorson, D. E., Schoemann, A. M., Liles, D., et al. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01728-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationMitro, S. D., Yang, W., Ferrara, A. M., Hedderson, M. M., Aung, M. T., Suthar, H., Raghunathan, R. S., Zhu, Y., Peterson, A. K., Reynolds, M., et al. (2025) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2025.122997 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“We quantified perceived stress using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) t-score (Kupst et al., 2015/09).”
Patient‐Reported Outcomes Among an Observational Cohort of Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain
Greco, C. M., Dodds, N. E., Acevedo, A. M., Anderst, W. J., Bell, K. M., Darwin, J., Delitto, A., Jakicic, J. M., McKernan, G., Patterson, C. G., et al. (2025) · JOR Spine · doi:10.1002/jsp2.70097 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“0 Pain Interference 4a is a component of the PROMIS 29 + 2 profile [17–23] that assesses pain interference with life activities over the past 7 days using four questions rated 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much).”
Markley, A. E., Stratton, K., Cho, G. Y., Schmidt, N. B., Suhr, J. A., Sheffler, J., Nguyen, C. C., Schubert, F. T., Quiles, J. R. G., Potter, M. R., et al. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2025.108044 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Harnett, N. G., Joshi, S., Kumar, P., Russell, C. E., Dillon, D. G., Baker, J. T., Pizzagalli, D. A., Kaufman, M. L., Nickerson, L. D. H., Jahanshad, N., et al. (2025) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.07.005 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Swake, T. T., & Young, D. K. (2025) · Journal of Women s & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/jwh.0000000000000339 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
White, K. P., Hewlings, S. J., Moseley, M., Moseley, M., D’Adamo, C. R., Colwell, C. S., Chen, J., & Pauli, E. K. (2025) · International Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.3390/ijtm5020023 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kuzu, D., & Kratz, A. L. (2025) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.022 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Clary, L. K., Mendelson, T., Webb, L., Jackson, D. B., Vázquez, M. G., Holifield, J., Musci, R. J., Johnson, R. M., Sanchez, D., Jans, M., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094618 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pilot trial of a community-based transition support program for autistic adults
Brewe, A. M., & White, S. W. (2025) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330251319884 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The GSES has strong internal consistency and convergent validity (Kupst et al., 2015; Salsman et al., 2019).”
- Authors
- Kupst, M. J., Butt, Z., Stoney, C. M., Griffith, J. W., Salsman, J. M., Folkman, S., & Cella, D.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kupst, Mary Jo
- Venue
- Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-02-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 531-544
- ISSN
- 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2205
- PMC
- PMC4515370
- OpenAlex
- W2001288118
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (HHS-N-260-2006-00007-C)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- stress, self-efficacy, emotional well-being, Perceived Stress Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, instrument development, psychometric properties, factor analysis, coping strategies, emotion regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Emotions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Self Efficacy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review