Cited by 133Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHealth Education and Validation

Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH toolbox for neurological and behavioral function

Open access
Kupst, Mary Jo, Butt, Zeeshan, Stoney, Catherine M., Griffith, James W., Salsman, John M., Folkman, Susan, Cella, David·2015·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function assessment battery contains measures in the domains of cognitive function, motor function, sensory function, and emotional health. It was designed for use in epidemiological and clinical trials health-related research. DESIGN: This paper describes the first phase of instrument development for the stress and self-efficacy subdomain of emotional health. Based on an extensive literature review and expert consultation, 127 measures were initially considered for inclusion in this subdomain, including measures of stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and coping. RESULTS: Several measures, including emotion regulation and measures of coping strategies, did not meet criteria that were a priori established for inclusion. Psychometric properties of the remaining candidate measures were evaluated using data from five independent samples (combined N = 3175). Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses indicated the Perceived Stress Scale and the General Self-Efficacy Scale each assessed single dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on their psychometric performance, these two instruments were selected for inclusion and subsequent national norming for the NIH Toolbox.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2014.994204

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    One General Self-Efficacy Scale item had a low corrected item-total correlation of .16 in children aged 8-12.

    “One item had a low corrected item-total correlation (.16) in 8–12 year-olds: “If someone tries to keep me from getting what I want, I can find a way to get what I want.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The General Self-Efficacy Scale model also had good fit indices for adolescents, children aged 8-12 in self- and proxy-report, and ages 13-17.

    “This model also had good fit indices for adolescents, ages 8–12 years (self- and proxy report) and 13–17 years of age.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Perceived Stress Scale item #12 had low corrected item-total correlations across all groups.

    “One item (item #12) had low corrected item-total correlations across all groups: “In the last month, how often have you found yourself thinking about things that you have to accomplish?””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Perceived Stress Scale item #12 had a low item-total correlation in all three pediatric samples.

    “Item #12 had a low item-total correlation in all three pediatric samples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Across all age groups, internal consistency reliability was good for the Perceived Stress Scale according to Cronbach's alpha.

    “Across all age groups, internal consistency reliability was good for the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) as indicated by Cronbach’s alpha (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 32
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the entire NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain, 554 measures were identified, and 127 were classified as potential measures of stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, or coping.

    “For the entire NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain, 554 measures were identified, and of these, 127 were classified as potential measures of stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation or coping.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Permission was granted to use 36 of the candidate measures.

    “We were granted permission to use 36 of those measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Based on the described procedures, perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and coping were initially considered the most important subdomains for building a Toolbox measurement strategy.

    “Based on the procedures described below, perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation and coping were initially considered to be the most important subdomains upon which to build a Toolbox measurement strategy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    After review by project staff and emotion domain consultants, 44 measures were selected for further consideration.

    “After review by project staff and emotion domain consultants, 44 measures were selected for further consideration based on criteria described earlier.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Consensus was reached that the four relevant constructs in the Stress and Self-Efficacy domain were Perceived Stress, Self-Efficacy, Emotion Regulation, and Coping.

    “In the Stress and Self-Efficacy domain, consensus was reached that the four relevant constructs identified were Perceived Stress, Self-Efficacy, Emotion Regulation, and Coping.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The short list included six measures of stressful events or perceived stress, three of self-efficacy, four of emotion regulation, and 31 of coping.

    “The resulting short list included six measures that assessed stressful events or perceived stress, 3 that assessed self-efficacy, 4 that assessed emotion regulation and 31 that assessed coping.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    On the basis of a comprehensive literature review and extensive discussions, the NIH Toolbox emotional health team selected perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and coping as important constructs to evaluate for possible inclusion.

    “On the basis of a comprehensive literature review and extensive discussions, the NIH Toolbox emotional health team selected perceived stress, self-efficacy, emotion regulation and coping as important constructs to be evaluated for possible inclusion in the NIH Toolbox.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Recruiting from an online research panel yielded samples that were predominantly White and had more years of education than population-based samples.

    “First, by recruiting participants from an online research panel, we obtained samples that were predominantly White with more years of education relative to population-based samples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Preliminary analyses of the Perceived Stress Scale suggested it measures a single dimension, although some variance was accounted for by item direction.

    “The preliminary analyses of the Perceived Stress Scale suggested that it measures a single dimension, although there was some variance accounted for by the direction of the items (positively- versus negatively-keyed).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The first attempt to fit a one-factor model for the General Self-Efficacy Scale was unsuccessful, with acceptable CFI = .97 but RMSEA > .10.

    “Our first attempt to fit a one-factor model was unsuccessful; CFI = .97 was acceptable, but RMSEA was >.10.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A modification index indicated residual dependency between two General Self-Efficacy Scale items with similar content, so the model was refit.

    “A modification index indicated a residual dependency between two items with similar content (see Table 3), so the model was refit to account for it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The five samples included adults aged 18+ (N=1111), adolescents aged 13-17 (N=512), children aged 8-12 for self-report (N=513), children aged 8-12 for proxy report (N=539), and children aged 3-7 for proxy report (N=500).

    “These five samples were recruited based on age and consisted of adults aged 18 years and above (N= 1111), adolescents aged 13–17 years (N=512), and children aged 8–12 years (N= 513) for self-report forms; and children aged 8–12 years (N= 539) and children aged 3–7 years (N= 500) for parent/guardian proxy forms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Five community-dwelling internet panel samples were recruited for the initial testing wave, with a total N of 3,175.

    “Five community-dwelling internet panel samples were recruited for the initial wave of testing (Total N=3,175).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For children, Cronbach's alpha for the Perceived Stress Scale was .89 for ages 13-17, .87 for ages 8-12, and .87 for the proxy-report version for ages 8-12.

    “Cronbach’s alpha was .89 for 13–17 year-olds, .87 for 8–12 year-olds, and 0.87 for a proxy-report version of the PSS for 8–12 year-olds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Kidcope, CSCY, How I Feel-EC, Ways of Coping, Brief COPE, and CBQ had good reliability and validity by classic psychometric analyses but could not be fitted to a unidimensional confirmatory factor analysis model.

    “The Kidcope, CSCY, How I Feel-EC, Ways of Coping, Brief COPE, and CBQ had good reliability and validity according to classic psychometric analyses, but could not be fitted to a unidimensional CFA model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Stress is associated with risk of cardiovascular disease, immune dysfunction, and certain cancers through autonomic, vagal, cortisol, and immune mechanisms.

    “It is related to risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, immune dysfunction, and certain cancers, through increased autonomic nervous system activity, poor vagal tone, chronically elevated blood cortisol levels, and decreased immunocompetence (Antoni et al., 2006; Cohen & Williamson, 1988; Raposa, Hammen, Brennan, O'Callaghan, & Najman, 2014; Steptoe & Kivimaki, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Antoni et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Raposa, Hammen, Brennan, O'Callaghan, & Najman, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Assessing Stress and Self-Efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function

    The NIH Toolbox initiative was created to identify, develop when needed, and validate measures in cognitive, emotional, motor, and sensory domains for large-scale epidemiological studies.

    “The NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIH Toolbox; nihtoolbox.org) initiative was developed to identify, create when necessary, and validate measures in the broad domains of cognitive function, emotional health, motor function, and sensory function for use large-scale epidemiological studies (Gershon, et al., 2010; Gershon, et al. 2013; Salsman, et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gershon, et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gershon, et al. 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Salsman, et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The subjective experience of psychological stress is shaped by appraisal of an event's personal significance in relation to values, goals, and coping resources.

    “The subjective experience of psychological stress is influenced by the individual’s appraisal of the personal significance of a given event in relation to his or her values and goals and options and resources for controlling the outcome (Folkman, 1984).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Folkman, 1984

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Psychological stress occurs when a person perceives environmental or internal demands as personally threatening and beyond their perceived adaptive capacity.

    “Psychological stress is experienced when an individual perceives environmental or internal demands that are personally threatening and exceed his or her perceived adaptive capacity (Cohen, Kessler, & Gordon, 1997; Folkman, 2010; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, Kessler, & Gordon, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Folkman, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Stress is relevant to disease and health, as shown in human and animal models.

    “The relevance of stress to disease and health has been demonstrated in both human and animal models (Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007; Segerstrom and Miller, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Segerstrom and Miller, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Assessing Stress and Self-Efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function

    Adding neurological and behavioral function measures to large epidemiological studies could enhance understanding of how these factors relate to varied outcomes while being cost-effective and adding little participant burden.

    “Including neurological and behavioral function measures in these large and expensive epidemiological studies could improve understanding of how neurological and behavioral health factors are related to diverse outcomes and do so cost-effectively and with minimal additional participant burden.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Assessing Stress and Self-Efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function

    The emotional health domain of the NIH Toolbox included four subdomains: Negative Affect, Positive Affect, Social Relationships, and Stress and Self-Efficacy.

    “For example, the emotional health domain was comprised of four subdomains: Negative Affect, Positive Affect, Social Relationships, and Stress and Self-Efficacy subdomains, the latter of which is the focus of this paper.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nowinski, Victorson, Debb, & Gershon, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Stress can reduce adherence to medication and medical recommendations and can increase health-damaging behavior.

    “For example, stress can hamper adherence to medication and other medical recommendations, and it can lead to increases in health-damaging behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Segerstrom and Miller, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Ways of Coping Questionnaire is arguably the most widely used coping-strategy scale for adolescents and adults and is a 50-item Likert scale with eight empirically derived factors.

    “The Ways of Coping Questionnaire (Folkman & Lazarus, 1988) is arguably the most widely used scale of coping strategies for adolescents and adults. It is a 50-item Likert scale with 8 empirically derived factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Folkman & Lazarus, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among people with acute or chronic disease, coping is a key factor in how well they manage their health condition, and coping styles can influence whether they cope in healthy or health-destructive ways.

    “Among individuals with acute or chronic diseases, coping is a key factor that can determine how well an individual conceptualizes and behaviorally manages a health condition, and ways of coping with stress can influence whether individuals cope in healthy or health-destructive ways (Carver & Vargas, 2011; Folkman, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carver & Vargas, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Folkman, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Difficulties in regulating emotions are related to problems in psychological and physical functioning.

    “Difficulties in regulating emotions have been related to problems in psychological and physical functioning (Appleton, Buka, Loucks, Gilman, & Kubzansky, 2013; Gross & Munoz, 1995; DeSteno, Gross & Kubzansky, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Appleton, Buka, Loucks, Gilman, & Kubzansky, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gross & Munoz, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites DeSteno, Gross & Kubzansky, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The General Self-Efficacy Scale measures personal competence to deal effectively with a variety of stressful situations.

    “It measures personal competence to deal effectively with a variety of stressful situations (Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Coping is defined as cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding one's resources.

    “The most comprehensive and frequently-cited definition of coping was formulated by Lazarus and Folkman (1984): “cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external or internal demands (and conflicts between them) that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the resources of the person.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lazarus and Folkman (1984)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Secondary appraisal involves the degree to which one believes one can influence internal states, behavior, the environment, or desired outcomes.

    “Secondary appraisal involves the extent to which one believes they can influence or affect their own internal states, their behavior, the environment, and/or desired outcomes (perceived control) (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Wallston, Wallston, Smith & Dobbins, 1987).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wallston, Wallston, Smith & Dobbins, 1987

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Brief Cope is a widely used coping scale with 28 items forming 14 two-item subscales and good psychometrics.

    “Another widely used scale of coping strategies is the Brief Cope (Carver, 1997), a 28 item scale with 14 2-item subscales with good psychometrics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carver, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Children's Behavior Questionnaire is widely used in child development and behavior research and has excellent psychometric properties.

    “The CBQ is a widely used measure of child development and behavior and has excellent psychometric properties ((Rothbart, Ahadi, Hershey, & Fisher, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rothbart, Ahadi, Hershey, & Fisher, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Self-efficacy is the belief that one can respond to stressful demands and has direct and indirect effects on health, including health-related behavior.

    “Not a measure of the stress level itself, self-efficacy involves the belief that one is able to respond to demands of a stressful situation and it has both direct and indirect effects on health, including engaging in health-related behaviors (Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schwarzer & Luszczynska, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The General Self-Efficacy Scale was identified to measure general self-efficacy.

    “The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES; Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995) scale was identified to measure general self-efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Evaluating one's self-efficacy for implementing required strategies is an essential part of judging opportunities for personal control in a stressful situation.

    “An essential component in judging opportunities for personal control in a stressful situation is the evaluation of one’s self- efficacy with respect to implementing the required strategies (Bandura, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bandura, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Emotion regulation is a process for monitoring and managing emotional experience and expression and can be conscious or unconscious.

    “Emotion regulation is a process by which a person can attempt to monitor and manage the experience and expression of their emotions and it can involve both conscious and unconscious processes (Gross & John, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gross & John, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Emotion Control Factor of the How I Feel measure is a 10-item scale with established good reliability and validity.

    “The Emotion Control Factor of the How I Feel measure (Walden, Harris, & Catron, 2003) is a 10-item scale that has established good reliability and validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Walden, Harris, & Catron, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Perceived Stress Scale is the most frequently used measure of subjective stress, including in health and quality-of-life studies, and has excellent reliability and validity.

    “This scale is the most frequently used measure of a person’s subjective experience of stress, including studies of health and quality of life, and has excellent reliability and validity (Cohen & Williamson, 1988, Monroe, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Monroe, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Perceived Stress Scale was selected for the perceived stress subdomain.

    “For the subdomain of perceived stress, The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen, Kessler & Gordon, 1995) was selected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, Kessler & Gordon, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The General Self-Efficacy Scale is a 10-item Likert scale with excellent reliability, stability, and validity, and has been used in many studies of health-related stress and behavior.

    “It is a 10 item Likert scale and has excellent reliability, stability, and validity, and has been used in numerous studies related to health-related stress and behavior (Lusczynska, Gutierrez-Doña, & Schwarzer, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lusczynska, Gutierrez-Doña, & Schwarzer, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Kidcope has 10 items representing coping strategies, and the Coping Scale for Children and Youth has 29 items with good psychometric properties.

    “For children and adolescents, two scales were initially considered: The Kidcope (Spirito, Stark & Williams, 1988), comprised of 10 items representing coping strategies and the Coping Scale for Children and Youth (CSCY) (Brodzinsky et al., 1992) comprised of 29 items with good psychometric properties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Spirito, Stark & Williams, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brodzinsky et al., 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These emotion regulation and coping measures have good psychometric properties and remain useful for the constructs they represent, and were recommended as supplemental measures for research involving Toolbox measures.

    “These measures have good psychometric properties, and, although they were not included as Toolbox measures, they remain useful measures of the constructs they represent and were recommended as supplemental measures for research involving Toolbox measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    These findings are consistent with well-known complexities in assessing emotion regulation and coping.

    “Although disappointing because of the conceptual importance attributed to these measures in this subdomain, these findings are consistent with well-known complexities that characterize their assessment (Bridges, Denham & Ganiban, 2004; Folkman, & Moskowitz, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bridges, Denham & Ganiban, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Folkman, & Moskowitz, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Items were reviewed for relevance and use by older respondents, cultural sensitivity and conceptual appropriateness across cultural groups, and future Spanish translatability.

    “Items were reviewed for relevance and use by older respondents (Geriatric Working Group), for cultural sensitivity and conceptual appropriateness across cultural groups (Cultural Working Group) and for Spanish translatability in the future (Spanish Language Working Group).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    A key conceptual problem is that the adaptiveness or maladaptiveness of coping is determined in relation to a specific context.

    “The key conceptual problem is that the evaluation of the adaptiveness/maladaptiveness of coping is determined in relation to a specific context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A main reason these scales were not included was the lack of a single outcome score, as most were multidimensional and too lengthy for inclusion.

    “One main reason was the lack of a single outcome score, as most were multidimensional measures and resulted in being too lengthy for inclusion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sample was purposive and designed with recruitment quotas for age, gender, and education.

    “This was a purposive sample designed with recruitment quotas for age, gender, and education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Perceived Stress Scale authors also found a low factor loading for item 12 and three other items, reduced the scale to 10 items, and found the PSS10 reliability and validity equivalent to the PSS14.

    “The scale authors (Cohen & Williamson, 1988) had also found a low factor loading for Item 12, as well as three other items and reduced the items to 10 (the PSS10). Their psychometric analyses found reliability and validity to be equivalent to the PSS14.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Item response theory was not recommended for scoring because the measures had sufficient psychometric properties and using them as-is would preserve continuity with existing literature.

    “Because measures in this subdomain had sufficient psychometric properties, item response theory was not recommended for scoring because using the measures “as is” would allow for continuity with the extant literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The Perceived Stress Scale and General Self-Efficacy Scale were deemed appropriate for inclusion in the Stress and Self-Efficacy subdomain of the NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain.

    “Thus, these measures were deemed as appropriate for inclusion in this subdomain of the NIH Toolbox Emotional Health domain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because of these challenges and the constraints of the NIH Toolbox, the emotion regulation and coping measures were judged unsuitable for the project, which may be a limitation of the NIH Toolbox.

    “Because of these challenges and the constraints of the NIH Toolbox, these measures were judged unsuitable for this project, which may be a limitation of the NIH Toolbox.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The measures judged most appropriate for NIH Toolbox purposes are widely used, psychometrically sound, and brief.

    “Thus, the measures that were judged most appropriate for NIH Toolbox purposes are widely used, psychometrically sound, and brief.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This may be evidence of participation bias, which is often unavoidable in volunteer research.

    “This may be evidence of a participation bias which is often unavoidable in volunteer research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A key methodological problem is that coping is multidimensional, with no agreement on the number of dimensions or a gold-standard classification system.

    “The key methodological problem is that coping is multi-dimensional with no agreement about the number of dimensions or a gold standard classification system (Skinner, Edge, Altman, & Sherwood, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Skinner, Edge, Altman, & Sherwood, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All items were reviewed by expert panels to identify and address potential assessment issues in special subgroups.

    “As part of the NIH Toolbox project, all items were also reviewed by expert panels to identify and address potential issues related to assessment in special subgroups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    After the analyses, the authors decided to recommend the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale for the Toolbox.

    “After this analysis, we decided to recommend the PSS10 for the Toolbox.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “Based on our psychometric results, which were similar to those of the authors (Cohen & Williamson, 1988), we decided to recommend the 10-item version.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen & Williamson, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Potential participants underwent rigorous screening that included validation of internet protocol addresses to prevent fraudulent survey participation.

    “Potential participants completed a rigorous screening process to determine their eligibility, which included validation of their internet protocol addresses to ensure that they were not fraudulently participating in surveys..”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
56 of 56

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Browne M. W., 1993, Alternative ways of assessing model fit testing structural equation models
  2. Schwarzer R., 2008, Health Behavior Constructs: Theory, Measurement and Research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kupst, M. J., Butt, Z., Stoney, C. M., Griffith, J. W., Salsman, J. M., Folkman, S., & Cella, D.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Kupst, Mary Jo
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2015-02-10
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
531-544
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2001288118
Cited by
133
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (HHS-N-260-2006-00007-C)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
stress, self-efficacy, emotional well-being, Perceived Stress Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, instrument development, psychometric properties, factor analysis, coping strategies, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Emotions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review