Cited by 8Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A Multimethodological Study of Preschoolers' Preferences for Aggressive Television and Video Games

Jamnik, Matthew R., DiLalla, Lisabeth F.·2018·The Journal of Genetic Psychology

Abstract

The association between aggressive media and related behavior is complicated, and the role of underlying genetics has not been adequately explored. A better understanding of the role of genetics on the relationship between aggressive media and behavior, especially in young children, is critical. Using a twin/triplets sample (N = 184 children), the authors investigated the association between preschoolers' preferred media choices and their aggressive behaviors. A multimeasure methodology was utilized, examining children's reports of their preferred media games and shows, observed child negativity and aggression in the lab, and parent reports of their own and their children's aggressive behaviors. The results demonstrated a significant relationship between maternal aggression and parent-reported child aggression, especially for boys. Genetic analyses demonstrated significant heritability for children's parent-reported aggressive behaviors, supporting the biological basis of aggression, but not for media aggression preferences. Controlling for genetics, the authors found that the association between media preferences and aggressive behavior may be genetic in origin. These results emphasize the importance of considering shared genetics underlying the relationship between children's aggressive behaviors and their media preferences, as well as environmental influences. By examining preschoolers, the present study provides insight into the importance of media influences in children younger than those previously studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221325.2018.1454883

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have demonstrated a significant heritability for aggressive behaviors of up to 60%.

    “Studies have demonstrated a significant heritability for aggressive behaviors of up to 60% [36–38].”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [36]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jamnik, M. R., & DiLalla, L. F.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
DiLalla, Lisabeth F.
Venue
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Published
2018-04-19
Volume
179
Issue
3
Pages
156-169
ISSN
  • 0022-1325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0896
OpenAlex
W2800537610
Cited by
8
References
56
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Genetic Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
aggressive environments, media preferences, preschool children, aggression, heritability, maternal aggression, child aggression, shared environment, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aggression, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Television, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review