Cited by 42Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentIdentity, Memory, and TherapyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Helicopter parenting, authenticity, and depressive symptoms: a mediation model

Turner, Lisa A., Faulk, Robert D., Garner, Tully·2020·The Journal of Genetic Psychology

Abstract

Helicopter parenting is an overinvolved, overcontrolling parenting style that likely interferes with children's healthy development of authenticity. Authenticity refers to self-awareness and a genuine expression of the self and is important for college students as they traverse the opportunities and challenges of emerging adulthood. Authenticity appears to be a protective characteristic and is negatively related to depressive symptoms. The authors proposed and tested a model in which helicopter parenting was related to depressive symptoms through authenticity. In the present investigation, college students (n = 286) completed self-report instruments assessing perceptions of helicopter parenting, current states of authenticity (self-alienation, authentic living, external influence), and depressive symptoms. Path analysis was conducted with AMOS, and the data fit the model well (χ 2 (1) = .580, p = .446, TLI = 1.103, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = .000). Helicopter parenting was related to higher levels of self-alienation and external influence and lower levels of authentic living. Self-alienation and authentic living were related to depressive symptoms (external influence was not related to depressive symptoms). These findings demonstrate the importance of considering developmental predictors of authenticity and depression. Helicopter parenting is likely to inhibit authenticity in ways that may contribute to difficulties in emerging adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221325.2020.1775170

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, L. A., Faulk, R. D., & Garner, T.
Affiliations
University of South Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Turner, Lisa A.
Venue
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
181
Issue
6
Pages
500-505
ISSN
  • 0022-1325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0896
OpenAlex
W3036536700
Cited by
42
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Genetic Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
helicopter parenting, authenticity, depressive symptoms, self-alienation, authentic living, external influence, emerging adulthood, university students, parenting styles, mediation model, self-awareness
MeSH terms
Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Social Alienation, Parenting, Personal Autonomy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review