Cited by 37Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentStudent Stress and CopingPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Helicopter parenting and depressive level among non-clinical Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model

Wang, Junjing, Lai, Ruiju, Yang, An, Yang, Mengdan, Guo, Yuan·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Helicopter parenting has been one of major contributing factors to depression, and the occurrence of severe depressive level has been increasing in college students. Based on self-determinant theory (SDT), previous studies have indicated the pathway between helicopter parenting and depressive level, especially focusing on the roles of basic psychological needs, self-control and teacher autonomy support. But few studies focused on the full model of these interactive factors and the Chinese non-clinical college students. Methods Non-clinical college students (n = 648), aging from 17 to 28 years old, were recruited as participants from universities in Guangzhou, China, in 2020. The participants were asked to complete five self-report questionnaires, including Helicopter Parenting Scale (HPS), Learning Climate Questionnaire (LCQ), Basic Psychological Needs Scale (BPNS), Self-Control Scale (SCS), and Beck Depression Scale-II (BDI-II). Results Results have revealed that basic psychological needs and self-control played a chain-type mediating role between helicopter parenting and depressive scores among non-clinical Chinese college students. In addition, the path between helicopter parenting and basic psychological needs was moderated by teacher autonomy support. Conclusions This study reveals a potential pathway of how helicopter parenting influence the depressive level among non-clinical college students in the context of Chinese background. These findings give multi-di…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.078

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gibbs, 2009, The growing backlash against overparenting, Time, 20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Lai, R., Yang, A., Yang, M., & Guo, Y.
Affiliations
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN)
Corresponding author
Lai, Ruiju
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
295
Pages
522-529
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3196733435
Cited by
37
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81801685)
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (EBA160407)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030310003)
  • Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (20GWCXXM-33)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
helicopter parenting, depression, university students, basic psychological needs, self-control, teacher autonomy support, self-determination theory, moderated mediation, Chinese students, student mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aircraft, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Universities, Parenting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review