Cited by 53Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentGender, Feminism, and MediaSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Women’s and Men’s Reactions to Receiving Unsolicited Genital Images from Men

Marcotte, Alexandra S., Gesselman, Amanda N., Fisher, Helen E., Garcia, Justin R.·2021·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

Recently, mounting anecdotal reports – mostly by heterosexual women on Internet-based dating platforms – have drawn attention to the frequency of men sending unsolicited photos of their own genitals (i.e., “dick pics”). While initial research has documented that the sending of unsolicited nude pictures is fairly common, with generally similar underlying motivations for sending solicited and unsolicited images, understanding recipients’ experiences has social-behavioral research, clinical, and potentially legal implications. In a U.S. sample of 2,045 women of all sexual identities and 298 gay/bisexual men, we found that among those who had ever received a “dick pic”, nearly all (91%) had also received an unsolicited “dick pic.” Women of all sexual identities predominantly experienced negative responses to these unsolicited nude images, with only a minority selecting any positive or neutral/ambivalent reactions. Additionally, women who experienced more unsolicited advances from men in the last year were more likely to select multiple negative reactions, and younger (vs. older) women selected more negative and neutral/ambivalent responses. Conversely, gay and bisexual men responded positively, with few choosing any negative or neutral/ambivalent responses. Findings highlight gendered dynamics of unsolicited sexting and misaligned reactions to male senders, raising questions about sexual harassment in the digital age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2020.1779171

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies found similar negative reactions to dick pics: Burkett's (2015) qualitative study with girls calling dick pic senders creeps and weirdos; Marcotte et al.'s (2021) study of adult women describing being grossed out and disrespected; and Mandau's (2019) study of aged 17 and above participants finding dick pics repulsive, shocking, and intrusive.

    “The negative reactions align with Burkett ' s (2015) qualitative study with girls calling dick pic senders ' creeps ' and ' weirdos ' (p. 848); Marcotte et al.'s (2021) study of adult women participants who described being ' grossed out ' and feeling ' disrespected ' and Mandau ' s (2019) study of aged 17 and above participants who found dick pics ' repulsive, ' ' shocking, ' and ' intru”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcotte, A. S., Gesselman, A. N., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Marcotte, Alexandra S.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2020-07-02
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
512-521
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W3038590192
Cited by
53
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Match (n/a)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
online dating, sexual harassment, gender differences, sexual identity, gay and bisexual men, age differences
MeSH terms
Bisexuality, Female, Genitalia, Humans, Male, Men, Sexual Behavior, Heterosexuality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review