Women’s and Men’s Reactions to Receiving Unsolicited Genital Images from Men
Abstract
Recently, mounting anecdotal reports – mostly by heterosexual women on Internet-based dating platforms – have drawn attention to the frequency of men sending unsolicited photos of their own genitals (i.e., “dick pics”). While initial research has documented that the sending of unsolicited nude pictures is fairly common, with generally similar underlying motivations for sending solicited and unsolicited images, understanding recipients’ experiences has social-behavioral research, clinical, and potentially legal implications. In a U.S. sample of 2,045 women of all sexual identities and 298 gay/bisexual men, we found that among those who had ever received a “dick pic”, nearly all (91%) had also received an unsolicited “dick pic.” Women of all sexual identities predominantly experienced negative responses to these unsolicited nude images, with only a minority selecting any positive or neutral/ambivalent reactions. Additionally, women who experienced more unsolicited advances from men in the last year were more likely to select multiple negative reactions, and younger (vs. older) women selected more negative and neutral/ambivalent responses. Conversely, gay and bisexual men responded positively, with few choosing any negative or neutral/ambivalent responses. Findings highlight gendered dynamics of unsolicited sexting and misaligned reactions to male senders, raising questions about sexual harassment in the digital age.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies found similar negative reactions to dick pics: Burkett's (2015) qualitative study with girls calling dick pic senders creeps and weirdos; Marcotte et al.'s (2021) study of adult women describing being grossed out and disrespected; and Mandau's (2019) study of aged 17 and above participants finding dick pics repulsive, shocking, and intrusive.
“The negative reactions align with Burkett ' s (2015) qualitative study with girls calling dick pic senders ' creeps ' and ' weirdos ' (p. 848); Marcotte et al.'s (2021) study of adult women participants who described being ' grossed out ' and feeling ' disrespected ' and Mandau ' s (2019) study of aged 17 and above participants who found dick pics ' repulsive, ' ' shocking, ' and ' intru”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Marcotte et al., 2021
Cites
Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243205278639 · Cited by 9,367 · see citing works
Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal
Zajonc, R. B. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00154 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700113499853 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media
Salter, M. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815604133 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Dick pics on blast: A woman’s resistance to online sexual harassment using humour, art and Instagram
Vitis, L., & Gilmour, F. (2017) · Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal · doi:10.1177/1741659016652445 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Oswald, F., Lopes, A., Skoda, K., Hesse, C. L., & Pedersen, C. L. (2020) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2019.1639036 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
‘A male dominance kind of vibe’: Approaching unsolicited dick pics as sexism
Amundsen, R. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820907025 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ringrose, J., Milne, B., Mishna, F., Regehr, K., & Slane, A. (2022) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Gesselman, A. N., Kaufman, E. M., Marcotte, A. S., Reynolds, T. A., & Garcia, J. R. (2023) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2021.2007521 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationCriminalising Cyberflashing: Options for Law Reform
McGlynn, C., & Johnson, K. (2021) · The Journal of Criminal Law · doi:10.1177/0022018320972306 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Courtice, E. L., Czechowski, K., Noorishad, P.-G., & Shaughnessy, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673202 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241284413 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marcotte, A. S., Gesselman, A. N., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marcotte, Alexandra S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-07-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 512-521
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W3038590192
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Match (n/a)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- online dating, sexual harassment, gender differences, sexual identity, gay and bisexual men, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Bisexuality, Female, Genitalia, Humans, Male, Men, Sexual Behavior, Heterosexuality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review