Cited by 28Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

Role of pain-based catastrophizing in pain, disability, distress, and suicidal ideation

Noyman-Veksler, Gal, Lerman, Sheera F., Joiner, Thomas E., Brill, Silviu, Rudich, Zvia, Shalev, Hadar, Shahar, Golan·2017·Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In chronic pain, patients' coping affects their adaptation. In two studies, we examined the role of pain catastrophizing, a maladaptive coping strategy, in pain, distress, and disability. In Study 2 we compared catastrophizing to pain acceptance and to other coping strategies. METHODS: Study 1. Chronic pain patients (N = 428) were assessed four times as to their pain, disability, catastrophizing, and distress (depression and anxiety). Study 2. Patients (N = 165) were assessed as to coping and pain acceptance, pain, related distress, depression, hope, suicidal ideations, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness. RESULTS: Study 1. A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis revealed that Time 1 Pain-based catastrophizing prospectively predicted pain (β =.36, p < .001). Distress prospectively predicted pain related disability (β = .34, p <.001). Study 2. Pain-based catastrophizing predicted sensory pain (β = .22, p = .018), depression (β = .43, p < .001), and suicidal ideation (O.R. = 1.88), which were also predicted by depression and perceived burdensomeness. Distraction predicted sensory pain (β = .21, p = .017, respectively). Activity engagement predicted low levels of depression (β = -.29, p < .001, respectively), and willingness to accept pain predicted low pain-related distress (β = -.16, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Pain catastro-phizing and pain acceptance constitute risk and resilience factors. Both should be assessed and targeted in pain management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00332747.2016.1230984

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hoping and praying is correlated with higher disability, more pain interference, and greater pain severity.

    “Likewise, hoping and praying is also correlated with higher levels of disability, more pain interference, and increased pain severity 280–283.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noyman-Veksler, G., Lerman, S. F., Joiner, T. E., Brill, S., Rudich, Z., Shalev, H., & Shahar, G.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Noyman-Veksler, Gal
Venue
Psychiatry
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
155-170
ISSN
  • 0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-281X
OpenAlex
W2740513887
Cited by
28
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation (IL) (197/12)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, chronic pain, pain acceptance, coping strategies, disability, distress, depression, suicidal ideation, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, distraction, activity engagement, resilience factors, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Catastrophization, Suicidal Ideation, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review