CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87Archaeology and Cultural HeritageAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeological and Geological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How far to Conchucos? A GIS approach to assessing the implications of exotic materials at Chavín de Huántar

Contreras, Daniel A.·2011·World Archaeology
DOI 10.1080/00438243.2011.605841
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Chavín de Huántar has long been recognized as a site of pan-regional importance in the first millennium bce Central Andes. Multiple lines of evidence link the site to costa, sierra and selva. Using exotic goods for which provenance is known – for example, obsidian, cinnabar, selected ceramics and marine shell – specific areas with which Chavín interacted can be identified. These interactions are considered in the context of distinct ways of thinking about Central Andean space – a least-cost transportation surface, the Inca road network and ethno-historically reconstructed territories. I argue that explicitly modeling the implications of connecting such nodes and considering distance in multiple ways facilitates a better characterization of interregional interaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438243.2011.605841

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Burger R. L., 1993, Latin American Horizons, 41
  2. Contreras D. A., Social Archaeometry
  3. Gorriti-Manchego M., 2000, Boletin del Museo de Arqueologia y Antropologia de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, 10
  4. Hyslop J., 1984, The Inca Road System
  5. Kembel S. R., 2004, Andean Archaeology, 51
  6. Lumbreras, L. G. Towards a re-evaluation of Chavin. Dumbarton Oaks Conference on Chavin, October 26th and 27th, 1968. Edited by: Benson, E. P. pp.1–28. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
  7. Matsumoto, G. Availability of least-cost pathway analysis for the study of Inca road system. Poster presented at the 36th Annual Midwest Conference on Andean and Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory. Madison, WI
  8. Matsumoto Y., 2010, Revista Pacha Runa, 1, 25
  9. Moore J. D., 2005, Cultural Landscapes in the Ancient Andes
  10. Nado, K. 2007. “Trade, culture, and power in prehistoric Peru: the chemical characterization of obsidian from Chavín de Huántar”. BA dissertation, Department of Anthropological Sciences, Stanford University.
  11. Rick J. W., 2011, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 13, 87
  12. Sayre M. P., 2009, Andean Past, 9, 340
  13. Tobler W., 1993, Non-isotropic Geographic Modeling: Three Presentations on Geographic Analysis and Modeling
  14. Tripcevich, N. 2009. “Cost-distance analysis”. Available at:http://mapaspects.org/courses/gis-and-anthropology/workshop-2009-viewshed-and-cost-distance/ii-cost-distance-2009
  15. van Valkenburgh, N. P. 2003. “The sound of interregionalism in the Early Horizon and Late Initial Period: twenty Strombus galeatus trumpets from Chavín de Huántar, Peru”. BA dissertation, Department of Anthropological Sciences, Stanford University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Contreras, D. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Contreras, Daniel A.
Venue
World Archaeology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-09
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
380-397
ISSN
  • 0043-8243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1375
DOI
10.1080/00438243.2011.605841
OpenAlex
W1984649419
Cited by
87
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 42 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
World Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
Chavín de Huántar, exotic materials, obsidian, cinnabar, marine shells, ceramics (art and archaeology), interregional interaction, Central Andes, 1st millennium BC, provenance, Inca road network, Chavín

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review