The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) became a part of daily life, it has become important to determine user competence in using AI technology. Here, we propose the concept of AI literacy and develop a quantitative scale for obtaining accurate data regarding the AI literacy of ordinary users. We first identified the primary core constructs of AI literacy, including awareness, use, evaluation, and ethics. Next, we generated 65 items to capture these four constructs; only 31 items were retained after a three-step content validation process. Then, we conducted a survey, and collected two samples of data. By reducing the number of items using the first sample and performing reliability and validity tests on the second sample, we obtained a 12-item instrument for the quantitative measurement of AI literacy. The results confirmed that the proposed four-construct model is an adequate representation of AI literacy. Further, AI literacy is significantly related to digital literacy, attitude towards robots, and users’ daily usage of AI. This study will not only aid researchers in understanding how user competence in using AI technology affects human–AI interactions but will also help designers develop AI applications that are aligned with the AI literacy levels of the target users.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This attitude scale was used because it is one of the shortest and, thus, one of the most resource-efficient instruments designed to capture attitudes; it had already been validated in the native language of the course participants.”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This could be an indication of discriminant validity because, in theory, AI literacy and attitudes toward AI are assumed to be two different constructs, representing cognitive/skill and affective aspects, respectively [9,16,20-22].”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“The reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions range between 0.72 and 0.76, and the overall reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency.”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al. (2022)
In the citing paper
“The Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS; Wang et al., 2023) measures AI understanding and competence across four subscales: awareness, usage, evaluation and ethics, using 12 items on a 7- point Likert scale.”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“The validity of the self-report measurement instruments for AI literacy [11,12,14,15] has only been tested regarding their factorial structure.”
From Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“It appears that individuals with higher positive attitudes, lower negative attitudes, and more willingness to use technology are also more likely to consider themselves competent [1, 46, 48].”
In the citing paper
“According to Wang et al. [47], the degree of AI literacy can determine individuals' readiness to embrace AI technologies.”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“AI literacy improves understanding of GenAI's advantages and functions, which encourages a favorable view of its acceptance and use in educational contexts [3,47,48,64].”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] affirmed a notable correlation between AI literacy and attitudes toward robots’ and users’ regular use of AI.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Higher AI literacy enables users to better understand the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies, leading to more effective adoption and usage [22,58].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] indicated that the level of AI literacy determines whether students embrace AI technologies.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Their ability to leverage the tool efficiently contributes to their perception of the AI tool as highly useful [22,58,62].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“The support for H10, which states that AI literacy positively influences the perceived value of ChatGPT, underscores the significance of students’ understanding of and familiarity with AI in appreciating the tool’s potential and contributions to their academic and personal endeavours.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Einax, J. W., Zwanziger, H. W., & Geiß, S. (1997) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,779
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
Xie, Y.-P., & Devellis, R. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075704 · Cited by 14,143
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Buckingham D., 1989, Radical Philosophy, 51, 12
- Buckingham D., 2007, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 323
- Calvani A., 2008, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4, 183
- 10.1177/002224378001700401 · DOI
- Eshet Y., 2004, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93
- Finstad K., 2010, Journal of Usability Studies, 5, 104
- Gapski, H. 2007. “Some Reflections on Digital Literacy.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Literacy.
- Gilster P., 1997, Digital Literacy
- 10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim Y., 2013, Journal of Digital Convergence, 11, 9
- Likert R., 1932, Archives of Psychology
- Mayerl J., 2016, Green European, 210
- Tarafdar M., 2019, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 37
- Wilson, H. J., and P. R. Daugherty. 2018. “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces.” Harvard Business Review .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,003
Fan, C., & Wang, H. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16091519
Arnado, A. A., Dy, K. G. P., Bongcawil-Lanaja, J. F., Arnado, M. O., & Benito, J. E. (2026) · International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT) · doi:10.1109/icett70124.2026.11666253
Tran, K. T. (2026) · Business Information Review · doi:10.1177/02663821261486173
Miao, C., & Zhang, S. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107693
Darkow, R., May, S., Tilli, M., Kollmann, M., Pölzl, D., Ritschl, H., & Reishofer, G. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.102580
Yan, J., Abideen, A. Z., Chen, X., & Xiang, W. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7365850
Öğretmenlere Yönelik Yapay Zekâ Tutum Ölçeği: Geliştirme ve Uygulama Çalışması
Adıgüzel, S., & KARALI, Y. (2026) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1756320
Elkhodr, M., & Gide, E. (2026) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-026-10022-7
Luo, X., Zhou, W., Zhang, C., & Zhang, R. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2721390
Park, K., Xu, D., & Xie, J. (2026) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2026.2722941
Wu, H., Ni, H., He, J., & Wee, E. H. (2026) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530.2026.2721637
Alan, B., Zengin, F. K., & Keçeci, G. (2026) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.1671049
Li, Z., Han, J., Wu, L., & Xiaogang, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1731653
Mızrak, F., Gözde, M. E. R. T., Erkasap, A., Özcan, A., & Mert, M. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14090196
Artificial Intelligence Responsiveness in Nursing
Al‐Hamad, A., Yasin, Y. M., & Yasin, L. (2026) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/ans.0000000000000695
Kavak, A., Gültekin, V., & Özel, N. (2026) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-05-2026-0234
Olthuis, E., Jansen, G., & Rietveld, R. (2026) · International Journal of the Legal Profession · doi:10.1080/09695958.2026.2710632
Nguyen, H. V., Le, N. K. N., Nguyen, T. H. T., Tran, N. M., Phu, G. T., Nguyen, N. T., & Nguyen, K. M. (2026) · China Finance Review International · doi:10.1108/cfri-07-2025-0470 · Cited by 1
Akalonu, C. P. (2026) · Journal of Communication Pedagogy · doi:10.31446/jcp.2026.1.03
BAŞ, M., Dörterler, S. Ö., Kılavuz, E., Aydoğmuş, M., & Başaran, S. D. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1854669
Fisher, N. (2026) · Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science · doi:10.1080/21639159.2026.2699660
Üztemur, S., Avcı, G., Gökalp, A., & Değirmenci, N. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261486100
Ma, H., Samat, C., Ren, B., Wattanachai, S., Dong, Y., & Han, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10587041/v1
Zagami, J. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00625-6
Obreja, D. M., Rughiniș, R., & Oprea, F. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103547
Advancing AI Literacy and Self-Efficacy Among Higher Education & Student Affairs Professionals
Byrne, V. L., Richards, R., & Pieters, K. (2026) · NASPA Journal · doi:10.1080/19496591.2026.2712219
Building Loyalty Through Trust and Sincerity: Evidence from Influencer Marketing on Instagram
CIOMAG, A.-M., Liana, S., & Dabija, D. (2026) · Proceeding Papers · doi:10.24818/basiq/2026/12/080
Lee, J.-H., & Noh, H. (2026) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.1108/apjba-10-2025-0781
Cho, N., Li, H., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2723298
Yuan, T., & Rau, P. P. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103939
Self-citationCipriani, E., Menicucci, D., & Grassini, S. (2026) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3822301.3822316
Parlangeli, O., Currò, F., Bracci, M., Marchigiani, E., Reina, L., & Palmitesta, P. (2026) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3822301.3822323
Feng, L., Zhao, Y., Zhai, J., Nie, X., Huang, Q., & Jing, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10670363/v1 · Cited by 1
GenAI Dependency Risk: Insights Through the Lens of Mindset, GenAI Literacy, and Academic Stress
Gökçearslan, Ş., Aktan, M. C., Yılmaz, B., & Çifci, E. G. (2026) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1155/cad/2647537
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2026) · International Conference on Educational Digitalization and Computer Science in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area · doi:10.1145/3828183.3828392
林, 浩. (2026) · Creative Education Studies · doi:10.12677/ces.2026.149672
An Explanatory Study of University Students’ Satisfaction with AI-Based Counseling Agents
Li, C., Zhang, W., & Huang, R. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-38014-2_12
AI literacy and employee green innovation behavior: A multilevel moderated mediation model
Li, Y., Qiao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107816
Alshehri, R. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2730904
Generative AI for Writing: Student Interactions with AI Feedback in a High School English ClassroomPreprint
Kwon, K., Park, J., Kale, U., Kim, K., & Yang, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7471093
Cho, N., Li, H., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2026) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-026-10359-9
Guo, Z., Li, W., Chen, L. L., Liang, Q., & Wu, Y. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100679 · Cited by 1
Teng, J., & Cho, S. (2026) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-026-10111-9
Large Language Models in Mathematics Education: Practitioners as Pedagogical Prompt Engineers
Caspari-Sadeghi, S. (2026) · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · doi:10.33423/7csntx42
Determinants of artificial intelligence literacy among accounting students
Helfenstein, C., Meurer, A. M., & de Azevedo, S. U. (2026) · Accounting and Management Information Systems · doi:10.24818/jamis.2026.03001
Mathura, S., Merwin, E. R., Gonzalez, G. M., Miller, Z. N., Berger, L., Keebler, J. R., & Lazzara, E. H. (2026) · Work · doi:10.1177/10519815261487994
Yildirim, I., Bellibaş, M., & Polatcan, M. (2026) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/jea-10-2025-0418
Luyo, S. L. L., Yauri, H. Y. M., Otazú, C. D. C., Miranda, S. J. A., Arévalo-Aranda, C., Castillo, M. M. F., Guerrero, L. A. O., Valle, C. A. G., Ballesteros, M. A. A., & Morales, A. E. P. (2026) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe16090143 · Cited by 4
Hou, J., Huang, Y., Wang, Q., Yao, X., Zhang, P., & Zhao, F. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16091712
Perle, J. G. (2026) · Mental Health and Digital Technologies · doi:10.1108/mhdt-04-2026-0024
Annak, İ. M., Irmak, B., & Karadağ, M. (2026) · Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2026.09.010
From AI use to AI-enabled loafing: a reliance-centred account in hybrid intelligence
Zhou, Y., Du, T., & Xiaoqian, L. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2734077
Zeng, Q., Hu, J., & Liu, L. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107427
Liao, Z., Zhou, X., Dai, D., & Ni, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1931835
Cheng, J., & Zhou, S. (2026) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.105124
Shen, W., & Gao, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1927892
Zhu, Z., & Li, Y. (2026) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2026.102464
Privacy management in LLM-based self-diagnosis: a cross-cultural study across 25 countries
Zhu, G., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, D. (2026) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2026.102465
Buchholtz, N. F., Schorcht, S., Bata, K., Baumanns, L., Knoth, N., Laupichler, M. C., Mah, D.-K., Mirsch, M., Noster, N., Peters, F., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1885959
Social Capital and Life Satisfaction Among Older Adults in South Korea: The Role of AI Literacy
Zeng, H., Yu, C., & Hu, M. (2026) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648261493004
Zhang, X., Wang, Y., & Li, C. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18199871
Ardito, C. A., Bonis, M. L. N. D., Noia, T. D., Sciascio, E. D., Fasano, G., & Lombardi, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-41627-8_9
Wu, C., & Lam, R. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101125
Durduran, Y., Hacılar, E., Küçükkendirci, H., Yücel, M., & Demir, L. S. (2026) · Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.33880/ejfm.2026150310
Dede, O. (2026) · Buca eğitim fakültesi dergisi (Online)/Buca Eğitim Fakültesi dergisi · doi:10.53444/deubefd.1897269
Wu, Y., Li, C., Yang, B., Yuan, R., Zhao, W., Guo, Y., Li, P., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, P. (2026) · Teaching and learning in nursing · doi:10.1016/j.teln.2026.09.004
Yurtçu, A. (2026) · International Journal Of Eurasia Social Sciences · doi:10.70736/ijoess.2512
Mete, E., Benli, R. K., KILIÇ, B. B., & YAŞARER, Ö. (2026) · Work · doi:10.1177/10519815261492327
Understanding Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Among Dermatologists: The Role of AI Literacy
Tosun, N., Doğan, S., & Tosun, M. (2026) · Dermatology Practical & Conceptual · doi:10.5826/dpc.160s1a7742
Yang, Y., Li, J., Li, Y., Zhang, S., & Guo, K. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2026.109205
Zhang, B. (2026) · Journal of Education and Educational Research · doi:10.54097/yvwak285
Wang, L., 聂曼华, Xiao, Y., & Liu, S. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-10522-1
He, J., 이한미, & Yao, X. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14100239
Gu, L. C., Gao, X., Li, R., Liu, Z., & Li, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-026-10128-0
Porwol, P., Peters, T. M., & Scharlau, I. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101351
El-Kholy, E. A., Baraka, N. I. M., Mohamed, S. M. S., & Abo-Hatab, T. A. E. S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10852343/v1
Yi, Q., 骆海燕, Gao, J., Lin, S., & Wu, L. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10755014/v1
What Does It Mean to Be AI Literate? Psychometric Validation of the Critical 3wAI Literacy Scale
Bozkurt, A., Ertan, S., & Cömert, Z. (2026) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.18.4.1451
Zhang, Z., Sun, J. J., & Liu, D. Y. (2026) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-026-00941-9
Lee, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., & Hwang, J. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2740422
Alrashed, M. A. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su181910171
Çelik, İ., Laru, J., Zabolotna, K., Jokela, I., & Mäkitalo, K. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37979-5_9
Xiaotong, S., & Um, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1949060
Higher education transformation through artificial intelligence: an empirical study in Saudi Arabia
GHUNAIM, H., & Masoud, M. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2722498
Du, Z., Dong, T., & Wei, B. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2744398
신선경, & Park, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1966278
Wang, X., & Niu, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1955267 · Cited by 1
Jovančević, A., Cvetković, I., Assche, J. V., Popović, M., & Bittner, E. A. C. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0341693
The nexus between agility-fostering competences and AI literacy of higher education students
Chwiłkowska-Kubala, A., Malewska, K. M., & Szumowski, W. (2026) · Management · doi:10.58691/man/235769
Mızrak, F., Kırgız, A. C., & Demirel, H. G. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14100248
O'Fee, T., Vijaykumar, S., & Craig, M. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001088
Mangili, F., Negrini, L., Babazadeh, M., Termine, A., & Delucchi, E. (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.23265976
Ma, W., Yuan, F., & Luo, H. (2026) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2026.2735312
Naderi, M. M., & Karimi, M. N. (2026) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-026-00407-z
Generative AI as a Catalyst: Transforming Digital Literacy Practices in English Language Teaching
Wan, Y., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2026) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688261487631
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1324-1337
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W4280549083
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 549 · 2025: 323 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 27
- FWCI
- 120.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018AAA0101700)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- AI literacy, AI literacy scale, user competence, AI awareness, AI ethics, AI evaluation, digital literacy, artificial intelligence use, human-AI interaction, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
