The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) became a part of daily life, it has become important to determine user competence in using AI technology. Here, we propose the concept of AI literacy and develop a quantitative scale for obtaining accurate data regarding the AI literacy of ordinary users. We first identified the primary core constructs of AI literacy, including awareness, use, evaluation, and ethics. Next, we generated 65 items to capture these four constructs; only 31 items were retained after a three-step content validation process. Then, we conducted a survey, and collected two samples of data. By reducing the number of items using the first sample and performing reliability and validity tests on the second sample, we obtained a 12-item instrument for the quantitative measurement of AI literacy. The results confirmed that the proposed four-construct model is an adequate representation of AI literacy. Further, AI literacy is significantly related to digital literacy, attitude towards robots, and users’ daily usage of AI. This study will not only aid researchers in understanding how user competence in using AI technology affects human–AI interactions but will also help designers develop AI applications that are aligned with the AI literacy levels of the target users.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This attitude scale was used because it is one of the shortest and, thus, one of the most resource-efficient instruments designed to capture attitudes; it had already been validated in the native language of the course participants.”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This could be an indication of discriminant validity because, in theory, AI literacy and attitudes toward AI are assumed to be two different constructs, representing cognitive/skill and affective aspects, respectively [9,16,20-22].”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“The reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions range between 0.72 and 0.76, and the overall reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency.”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al. (2022)
In the citing paper
“The Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS; Wang et al., 2023) measures AI understanding and competence across four subscales: awareness, usage, evaluation and ethics, using 12 items on a 7- point Likert scale.”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“The validity of the self-report measurement instruments for AI literacy [11,12,14,15] has only been tested regarding their factorial structure.”
From Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“It appears that individuals with higher positive attitudes, lower negative attitudes, and more willingness to use technology are also more likely to consider themselves competent [1, 46, 48].”
In the citing paper
“According to Wang et al. [47], the degree of AI literacy can determine individuals' readiness to embrace AI technologies.”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“AI literacy improves understanding of GenAI's advantages and functions, which encourages a favorable view of its acceptance and use in educational contexts [3,47,48,64].”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] affirmed a notable correlation between AI literacy and attitudes toward robots’ and users’ regular use of AI.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Higher AI literacy enables users to better understand the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies, leading to more effective adoption and usage [22,58].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] indicated that the level of AI literacy determines whether students embrace AI technologies.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Their ability to leverage the tool efficiently contributes to their perception of the AI tool as highly useful [22,58,62].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“The support for H10, which states that AI literacy positively influences the perceived value of ChatGPT, underscores the significance of students’ understanding of and familiarity with AI in appreciating the tool’s potential and contributions to their academic and personal endeavours.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Einax, J. W., Zwanziger, H. W., & Geiß, S. (1997) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,779
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
Xie, Y.-P., & Devellis, R. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075704 · Cited by 14,143
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Buckingham D., 1989, Radical Philosophy, 51, 12
- Buckingham D., 2007, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 323
- Calvani A., 2008, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4, 183
- 10.1177/002224378001700401 · DOI
- Eshet Y., 2004, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93
- Finstad K., 2010, Journal of Usability Studies, 5, 104
- Gapski, H. 2007. “Some Reflections on Digital Literacy.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Literacy.
- Gilster P., 1997, Digital Literacy
- 10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim Y., 2013, Journal of Digital Convergence, 11, 9
- Likert R., 1932, Archives of Psychology
- Mayerl J., 2016, Green European, 210
- Tarafdar M., 2019, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 37
- Wilson, H. J., and P. R. Daugherty. 2018. “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces.” Harvard Business Review .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,003
Li, X., & Thien, L. M. (2025) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/qae-08-2024-0152 · Cited by 11
Uluğ, E., Öner, K., ARSLANTAŞ, S., & Tatli, S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13597-3 · Cited by 7
Secondary Students’ Reading of Socio-Scientific Image-Texts on Climate Change in a GPT-4 Scenario
Pun, J., Cheung, K. K. C., & Kenneth-Li, W. (2025) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-025-10258-w · Cited by 7
Wood, G., Castellar, E. N., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93415-5_18 · Cited by 7
AI for Personalized Learning in Medical Education
Niazai, H., & Monib, W. K. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1519-5.ch004 · Cited by 8
Gedik, N., Işıkoğlu, M. A., & Şendağ, S. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2523379 · Cited by 10
Yin, W., Ren, G., & Zhang, G. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100451 · Cited by 9
Lan, Y., Liu, S., & Xia, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1652934 · Cited by 10
Assessing AI literacy of university students in Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey
Butt, F. S., Malik, A., & Mahmood, K. (2025) · Digital Library Perspectives · doi:10.1108/dlp-06-2025-0094 · Cited by 10
Zhijuan, L. A. I., Zhang, T., Huang, N., Li, Y., You, T., Zhao, J., & Zheng, J. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107019 · Cited by 8
Understanding Reader Perception Shifts upon Disclosure of AI Authorship
Nakano, H., Takezawa, J., Matulic, F., Yang, C.-L., & Yatani, K. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789076 · Cited by 17
Pangestu, F. N. N., Hamidah, I., Widaningsih, L., Abdullah, A. G., & Saputra, N. A. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100581 · Cited by 17
Kang, K. Y., & Park, J.-H. (2026) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006261425235 · Cited by 7
Uludaşdemir, D., Ayar, G., & Yetkin, E. E. (2026) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2026.03.037 · Cited by 8
Zahid, H., Danish, M., Ali, S., Huo, C., & Khalid, N. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2677727 · Cited by 8
Wang, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2026) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344026100524 · Cited by 7
Ansari, M. M., & Khan, S. (2023) · Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics & Sociology · doi:10.9734/ajaees/2023/v41i102224 · Cited by 7
Moral judgements of errors by AI systems and humans in civil and criminal law
Parlangeli, O., Currò, F., Palmitesta, P., & Guidi, S. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2283622 · Cited by 8
Lou, S., Zhang, X., & Zhang, D. (2024) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-024-05031-4 · Cited by 7
Analysis on Concept of AI Literacy According and Future Education to the Result of Systematic Review
Zhang, K., Li, L., & Yu, H.-C. (2024) · Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review · doi:10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n01.pe03293 · Cited by 9
Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlık Ölçeği Geliştirme ve Doğrulama Çalışması
Tekin, Ö. G. (2025) · Batı anadolu eğitim bilimleri dergisi · doi:10.51460/baebd.1609636 · Cited by 9
Adaptation of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale into Turkish: A Sample of Pre-Service Teachers
Uğraş, H., Doğan, M., & Uğraş, M. (2024) · e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.30900/kafkasegt.1429630 · Cited by 9
Exploring the GenAI Literacy of Chinese University Students in EFL Learning
Li, T., & Ding, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.377175 · Cited by 9
A Conceptual Framework for AI Literacy with a Focus on Competency
Yu, W. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00488-4 · Cited by 10
Be ethical then proficient: navigating employees’ ethical adoption of generative AI in the workplace
Yi, Y., Wang, D., Li, J.-Y., Lee, Y., & Tao, W. (2025) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/jcom-10-2024-0206 · Cited by 7
Lee, Y.-J., & Kim, S.-H. (2025) · Comput. Hum. Behav. Artif. Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100192 · Cited by 11
Does Artificial Intelligence Promote Sustainable Growth of Exporting Firms?
Chen, X., Wu, Y., & Long, Y. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17167273 · Cited by 9
Zhang, J., Pan, W., Liang, X., & Ge, J. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70209 · Cited by 10
AI Literacy and Gender Bias: Comparative Perspectives from the UK and Indonesia
Tunjungbiru, A. D., Pranggono, B., Sari, R. F., Sanchez-Velazquez, E., Purnamasari, P. D., Liliana, D. Y., & Andryani, N. A. C. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091143 · Cited by 6
Wislocki, K. E., Sami, S., Liberzon, G., & Zalta, A. K. (2025) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/80801 · Cited by 8
Oberoi, S. S., Singh, A. N., & Chakraborty, D. (2025) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.388742 · Cited by 8
Luo, M., Kuang, Z., Ng, D. T. K., Zheng, Z., & Yang, Y. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2575016 · Cited by 8
Neufeld, K., Ohly, S., Sedefoglu, D., Steinhardt, I., & Mauermeister, S. (2025) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/cdi-10-2024-0442 · Cited by 7
Held, P., Heubeck, T., & Meckl, R. (2025) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-06-2025-0711 · Cited by 5
Ni, B., & Huang, Q. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2563658 · Cited by 7
Ngo, T. V. N., Phan, T. T. H., Duong, C. D., & Vu, A. T. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102180 · Cited by 6
The Surprising Paradox of AI Literacy: How Lower AI Literacy Can Lead to Higher Acceptance
Jiaxuan, L., Han, M., & Yuan, Q. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2609912 · Cited by 8
Klein-Avraham, I., Ston, R., Atias, O., Roll, I., & Baram‐Tsabari, A. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105573 · Cited by 6
Sotero, J. M., Vicente, P. N., & Granado, A. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103237 · Cited by 7
Liu, C., & Lin, C. (2026) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-04-2025-0233 · Cited by 10
Multidimensional determinants of generative AI acceptance in foreign language education
Xu, T., & Xiong, Y. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-36700-1 · Cited by 9
Enhancing AI literacy for educators: Where to start and to what end?
Pei, B., Lu, J., Zhang, Z., Tuffour, P., & Park, S. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100550 · Cited by 18
Jabeen, M., & Lux, C. (2026) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2026.103221 · Cited by 9
Suartama, I. K., Sukmana, A. I. W. I. Y., & Triwahyuni, E. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2647508 · Cited by 6
Bruno, G., Spoto, A., Sarlo, M., Lotto, L., Marson, A., Cellini, N., & Cutini, S. (2023) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12679 · Cited by 6
Understanding and Predicting Teachers' Intention to Use Educational Chatbots
Çelik, İ., & Muukkonen, H. (2023) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2023.214919 · Cited by 6
The Ethics of Applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Communication Governance
Abokhoza, R., AL-Tkhayneh, K. M., Qaruty, R. A., Hadi, S. A. A., & Ellala, Z. K. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication, Networking and Services (ICCNS) · doi:10.1109/iccns62192.2024.10776312 · Cited by 6
Enhancing college students’ AI literacy through human-AI co-creation: a quantitative study
Wen, H., Lin, X., Liu, R., & Su, C. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2495733 · Cited by 7
Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study
Archambault, S. G., Murph, N. L., & Ramachandran, S. (2025) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2025.a968491 · Cited by 5
He, X., Zhou, R., Fan, Q., Xiao, X., Yu, Y., & Yan, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3557037 · Cited by 7
Moreira, G., Bogucka, E. P., Constantinides, M., & Quercia, D. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714117 · Cited by 7
Chen, S., Yin, H., & Cheung, A. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102715 · Cited by 8
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Üzerine Bir Araştırma
Oğan, E. (2025) · 3 SEKTÖR SOSYAL EKONOMİ DERGİSİ · doi:10.63556/tisej.2025.1565 · Cited by 7
Zhou, T., & Tang, B. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251384288 · Cited by 8
Zhao, T., Zhou, S., Liang, Q., & Xi, L. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2551120 · Cited by 5
Generative AI, cognitive load, and supply chain risk perception: the moderating role of AI literacy
Li, R., Wu, J., Niu, N., & Song, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2025.2584305 · Cited by 6
GÖDE, A., Açıkgöz, G., Erdem, H., & Dadak, A. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08392-0 · Cited by 5
Kavak, A., & Gültekin, V. (2026) · The journal of academic librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103191 · Cited by 3
Kaya, B., Güme, S., & Ergün, N. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2609913 · Cited by 5
Zhang, Y., & Kang, B. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04047-x · Cited by 9
Lim, T. P., & Teh, W. C. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01219-0 · Cited by 9
Steinhauser, S., & Heid, P. (2026) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.70038 · Cited by 8
Mind the gap: project managers, AI literacy, and the future of project management competences
Mariani, C., Mancini, M., & Aaltonen, K. (2026) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2026.100219 · Cited by 5
Duong, C. D. (2025) · ABAC Journal · doi:10.1108/abac-06-2025-0080 · Cited by 5
Tong, J., Xie, J., Xiang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Deng, P. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/9246900 · Cited by 5
Dimensions of AI de-anthropomorphization based on impression integration theory
Li, J., Huang, J., & Ni, B. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103352 · Cited by 6
Iyamu, I. O., Wheelans, C., Haag, D., Roe, I., Chang, H.-J., Donelle, L., Ellis, U. M., McKee, G., Bartlett, S., & Gilbert, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1802392 · Cited by 9
Wu, H., Ni, H., He, J., & Wee, E. H. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1884382 · Cited by 9
On the Predictors of Computational Thinking and Its Relationship with Artificial Intelligence
Guggemos, J. (2024) · Cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66462-5_10 · Cited by 6
Caz, Ç., YAZICI, Ö. F., & Biçer, T. (2024) · ROL Spor Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.70736/jrolss.463 · Cited by 5
Ruiz, M. U., Gecolea, J. P., Alcala, L. B. M., Gregana-Alcaraz, M. J. V., & Niegas, A. M. (2025) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1109/ic4e65071.2025.11075295 · Cited by 5
Manoharan, G., Ashtikar, S. P., Rao, C. V. G., Natarajan, S., & Nivedha, M. (2024) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1946-8.ch006 · Cited by 5
Adoption of AI-based order picking in warehouse: benefits, challenges, and critical success factors
Rad, F. F., Oghazi, P., İZMİR, O., & Kordestani, A. A. (2025) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-025-00858-1 · Cited by 6
Jogezai, N., Baloch, F. A., Jaffar, M., & Khilji, G. (2025) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/qae-12-2024-0255 · Cited by 5
Medina-Gual, L., Medina-Velázquez, L., & Parejo, J.-L. (2025) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.10596 · Cited by 4
País, M. R., Vitoria, R. V., Martínez‐Salazar, C., & Quiróz, J. S. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101668 · Cited by 7
Rafique, G. M., Mughari, S., & Khan, H. A. (2025) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-12-2024-0196 · Cited by 4
The more you think you know: AI experience, literacy, heuristics, and perceived AI authorship
Liu, S., Chu, H., Yuan, S., Sun, Y., & Men, L. R. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02643-w · Cited by 4
Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Imperative for the Future or Optional Insight?
Ateşgöz, K. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96720-7_10 · Cited by 6
Castro, R. A. G., Asté, W. M. B., Quezada, J. L. M., & Huanacuni, L. E. A. (2025) · Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies · doi:10.30935/ojcmt/17303 · Cited by 4
Yin, X., Ye, J., Yu, S., Li, H., & Lu, G. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13831-y · Cited by 6
Generative AI and information access: A sustainability model and a research agenda
Chowdhury, G. G., & Chowdhury, S. (2025) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515251377016 · Cited by 5
Sustainable HRM in the age of analytics: capabilities, risks and a path forward
Yin, J. (2025) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-12-2024-0786 · Cited by 10
Ali, S., Hassan, D., Hegazy, A., Selim, N., & Khadragy, S. (2025) · Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies · doi:10.30935/ojcmt/17661 · Cited by 5
Empirical Decision-Making Model of Intentional Unsafe Behavior of Construction Workers
Chae, J., & Kang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/jmenea.meeng-7153 · Cited by 4
Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı: Farklı Değişkenler Açısından Bir İnceleme
Dağdelen, E., Güngör, H., & Ünal, İ. (2025) · İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17679/inuefd.1650862 · Cited by 6
Beyond Risk Reduction: Vigilant Trust in Artificial Intelligence Based on Evidence from China
Ding, W.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., & Wang, J. (2026) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.3390/bs16010095 · Cited by 5
Exploring the scope of artificial intelligence literacy in education: A bibliometric approach
Shoustikova, T. V., Zaripova, Z. F., Ибрагимов, Г. И., Zaitseva, N. A., Pashanova, O. V., & Lobuteva, A. V. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/17892 · Cited by 6
TAŞKIRAN, N., Türk, G., & Hacı, A. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-08822-7 · Cited by 7
Goaill, M. M., Alfalah, A. A., Al‐Mamary, Y. H., Abubakar, A. A., Al‐Samhi, N. M., Salisu, I., Alshallaqi, M., & Alhaidan, H. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06678-2 · Cited by 4
Disclosures and literacy as determinants of AI-influencer recognition and well-being
Forrai, M., Balaban, D. C., & Schmuck, D. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2026.108978 · Cited by 6
Liu, Q., Zhao, L., Cui, Q., Bing, S., Dang, M., & Chen, J. (2026) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.70147 · Cited by 4
Dur, Ş., Coşğun, M., Göl, İ., & Erki̇n, Ö. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107117 · Cited by 5
Generative artificial intelligence for managerial foresight
Cristofaro, M., Augier, M., & Leoni, L. (2026) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2026.103831 · Cited by 6
Tanveer, M. (2026) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-026-00697-5 · Cited by 6
Zhang, J., Cao, J., & Meng, T. (2026) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-026-09944-x · Cited by 6
Durak, G., Çankaya, S., & Öncü, S. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14023-y · Cited by 4
Zhao, L., Yan, H., Yang, Y., Li, Y., Li, K., & Wan, F. (2026) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000002175 · Cited by 5
Latent profiles of AI literacy among K-12 students: predictors and links to self-regulated learning
Wang, D., Wang, Q., & Zhang, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1834851 · Cited by 6
Dai, Y., Liu, S., Zhou, S., Lai, S., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105687 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1324-1337
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W4280549083
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 549 · 2025: 323 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 27
- FWCI
- 120.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018AAA0101700)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- AI literacy, AI literacy scale, user competence, AI awareness, AI ethics, AI evaluation, digital literacy, artificial intelligence use, human-AI interaction, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
