The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) became a part of daily life, it has become important to determine user competence in using AI technology. Here, we propose the concept of AI literacy and develop a quantitative scale for obtaining accurate data regarding the AI literacy of ordinary users. We first identified the primary core constructs of AI literacy, including awareness, use, evaluation, and ethics. Next, we generated 65 items to capture these four constructs; only 31 items were retained after a three-step content validation process. Then, we conducted a survey, and collected two samples of data. By reducing the number of items using the first sample and performing reliability and validity tests on the second sample, we obtained a 12-item instrument for the quantitative measurement of AI literacy. The results confirmed that the proposed four-construct model is an adequate representation of AI literacy. Further, AI literacy is significantly related to digital literacy, attitude towards robots, and users’ daily usage of AI. This study will not only aid researchers in understanding how user competence in using AI technology affects human–AI interactions but will also help designers develop AI applications that are aligned with the AI literacy levels of the target users.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This attitude scale was used because it is one of the shortest and, thus, one of the most resource-efficient instruments designed to capture attitudes; it had already been validated in the native language of the course participants.”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This could be an indication of discriminant validity because, in theory, AI literacy and attitudes toward AI are assumed to be two different constructs, representing cognitive/skill and affective aspects, respectively [9,16,20-22].”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“The reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions range between 0.72 and 0.76, and the overall reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency.”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al. (2022)
In the citing paper
“The Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS; Wang et al., 2023) measures AI understanding and competence across four subscales: awareness, usage, evaluation and ethics, using 12 items on a 7- point Likert scale.”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“The validity of the self-report measurement instruments for AI literacy [11,12,14,15] has only been tested regarding their factorial structure.”
From Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“It appears that individuals with higher positive attitudes, lower negative attitudes, and more willingness to use technology are also more likely to consider themselves competent [1, 46, 48].”
In the citing paper
“According to Wang et al. [47], the degree of AI literacy can determine individuals' readiness to embrace AI technologies.”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“AI literacy improves understanding of GenAI's advantages and functions, which encourages a favorable view of its acceptance and use in educational contexts [3,47,48,64].”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] affirmed a notable correlation between AI literacy and attitudes toward robots’ and users’ regular use of AI.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Higher AI literacy enables users to better understand the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies, leading to more effective adoption and usage [22,58].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] indicated that the level of AI literacy determines whether students embrace AI technologies.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Their ability to leverage the tool efficiently contributes to their perception of the AI tool as highly useful [22,58,62].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“The support for H10, which states that AI literacy positively influences the perceived value of ChatGPT, underscores the significance of students’ understanding of and familiarity with AI in appreciating the tool’s potential and contributions to their academic and personal endeavours.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Einax, J. W., Zwanziger, H. W., & Geiß, S. (1997) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,779
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
Xie, Y.-P., & Devellis, R. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075704 · Cited by 14,143
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Buckingham D., 1989, Radical Philosophy, 51, 12
- Buckingham D., 2007, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 323
- Calvani A., 2008, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4, 183
- 10.1177/002224378001700401 · DOI
- Eshet Y., 2004, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93
- Finstad K., 2010, Journal of Usability Studies, 5, 104
- Gapski, H. 2007. “Some Reflections on Digital Literacy.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Literacy.
- Gilster P., 1997, Digital Literacy
- 10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim Y., 2013, Journal of Digital Convergence, 11, 9
- Likert R., 1932, Archives of Psychology
- Mayerl J., 2016, Green European, 210
- Tarafdar M., 2019, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 37
- Wilson, H. J., and P. R. Daugherty. 2018. “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces.” Harvard Business Review .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,003
Doğan, M. F. (2026) · Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.15285/maruaebd.1744148
Gómez‐Rey, P., Sánchez, S. A., Alamäki, A. V., & Schlögl, S. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16071024
YAPAY ZEKÂ OKURYAZARLIĞI ALANINDA YAPILAN ÇALIŞMALARIN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ
Çetinoğlu, D., & DOLMACI, A. (2026) · Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18037/ausbd.1815616
van Treek, A., Verhagen, S. J. W., Lechner, L., Ruysseveldt, J. V., & Spronken, M. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.105085
Torun, T., & Ulucan, H. (2026) · Herkes için Spor ve Rekreasyon Dergisi · doi:10.56639/jsar.1939420
Yapay Zekâ Destekli Dijital Araçları Kullanım Yetkinliği Ölçeği (YAZDAKYÖ)
Çelik, T. (2026) · Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17240/aibuefd.2026..-1824346
Messick, K. J., Bass, A., Fulmer, M. A., Williams, J., Anderson, J., Wolff, M., Taylor, H., Wright, E., Yonce, G., & Aranda, B. E. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0352419
Allaham, M. V. (2026) · Journal of Computer and Education Research · doi:10.18009/jcer.1767405
Pradubwate, R., Sirawong, N., & Trirut, N. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7036181
Phalswa, S., & Sharma, G. (2026) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i8s.2026.8826
KILINÇ, M. (2026) · Opus uluslararası toplum araştırmaları dergisi · doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1922808
How Digital Literacy Affects AI Literacy Among Preservice Teachers: Media Literacy as a Moderator
YİĞİT, M. F. (2026) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.26.59.13.4
Cleofas, J. V. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03099-2
Sağlık, Z. Y., SURAL, Ü. Ç., & Aktaş, N. (2026) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2026.2694588 · Cited by 1
Huang, H., & Zhou, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29897-3_16
EXPLORING FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ETHICAL DEPLOYMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Anyinyo, N. O. (2026) · Elmi əsərlər. · doi:10.64400/ea26-02-07
AI Usage and Employee Performance: The Dual Roles of AI Self-Efficacy and AI-Enabled HRM
Li, Y., & Geng, X. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14070786 · Cited by 2
Trust at the Core: Unpacking AI Adoption in Talent Acquisition from the Candidate PerspectivePreprint
Pachauri, M., & Farooquie, J. A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10241869/v1
Assessing Student AI Competencies: A Case Study Based on Interaction Traces
Marques, D., Morandini, M., & da Silva, A. C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30784-2_14
Jia, K., & Gan, Y. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14090-1
Chen, H.-Y., & Chi, Y. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101205
Artificial intelligence literacy of nursing students: A cross-sectional study
Dong, X. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107272 · Cited by 1
Huang, F., & Zhao, Y. (2026) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-026-01130-0
Filiz, A., Moralı, H. S., & Güzeller, C. O. (2026) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/18955
Graßl, I. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3786580.3786983
The effect of transformational leadership on employees’ generative AI usage intentions
Lim, S., & Kim, B. (2026) · Strategy and Leadership · doi:10.1108/sl-04-2026-0174 · Cited by 1
Hadi, S., & Rumanto, A. (2026) · Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba · doi:10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art17
Early Childhood Educators’ AI Literacy: Validation of the Meta-AI Literacy Scale in a Greek Context
Papadakis, S., Vatou, A., & Andreadakis, Z. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16071117 · Cited by 1
Fong, T. C. T., Chan, C. H., Kwok, A. P. K., Chan, R. T. H., Tang, R. L. M., Wen, M., & YIP, P. S. F. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/88362
Goal versus duty? Persuading seniors to use generative AI-enabled medical applications
Li, C., Zhai, Y., Zhao, J., Xiong, M., Gao, P., Cheng, T., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2026.103646
Tse, P. P.-S., Capio, C. M., Sze Kei Fanny, K. O. N. G., Kwok, T.-O., Lai, A. Y. K., Lam, Y. W., Law, Q. P. S., Lam, K. F., Tang, W. H., Liu, X., et al. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.107086
Zhao, K., Li, L., Chen, W., & Liu, H. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2701958
Pombo, N. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) · doi:10.1109/icst69053.2026.00024
Behera, A., Singh, A. K., Ranjan, R., & -, K. B. B. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-3204-6.ch012
Teaching with Technology, Leading with Values: ELT Teachers and the Future of AI in Education
Zaimoğlu, S. (2026) · English Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1007/s42321-026-00244-4
HATO, E., Çelik, B. K., Almaz, M. E., & Arıkan, V. (2026) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-09320-4
İyilikci, E. A., Yurt, H. M., Keysan, E. E., Ağaoğulları, N., Dallar, H., Güven, L. S., Özkan, M. S., Şahin, M., Günhan, Z., Baykuşak, E., et al. (2026) · Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1647141 · Cited by 1
Kumar, J. A., Salim, Z., Annamalai, N., Dhaliwal, J., & Singh, A. D. (2026) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-026-02982-w · Cited by 1
Development and initial validation of a survey examining critical GenAI literacy in higher education
Chaaban, Y., Naccache, H., & Qadhi, S. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1832507 · Cited by 2
Churiyah, M., Rusmana, D., Permansah, S., Dirgatama, C. H. A., & Indrawati, C. D. S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7155486
Navigating the Ethics: First-Year Students' Perspectives on AI Use in Higher Education
Saxena, A., Saxena, A., Wen, R., & Feyzi-Behnagh, R. (2025) · Asia Conference on Cognitive Engineering and Intelligent Interaction (CEII) · doi:10.1109/ceii67787.2025.00053
Mohamed, M. E., & Aljuaid, F. (2026) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2026.108274
Biagini, G., & Ranieri, M. (2026) · EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING · doi:10.3280/exioa1-2026oa23214
AI literacy in L2 writing and its association with L2 writing engagement
Du, C., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/73704
Khasawneh, Y. J. A., Khasawneh, N. A. S., Khasawneh, M. A. S., Sufyan, N. S., & Khasawneh, A. J. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70301 · Cited by 1
Gu, J., He, L., Ling, G., Zhan, Z., Liu, H., & Huang, J. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-05128-3
Pan, L., Shuang, X., & Liu, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1798750
Gong, T., & Huang, Y. (2026) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2026.2710978
Vu, S. V., & Nguyen, T. N. (2026) · Journal Of Advanced Pharmacy Education And Research · doi:10.51847/zmrnxdwnfn
Zheng, H., Han, F., Yang, H., Xu, J., Wu, Y., Wu, J., & Li, T. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2711024 · Cited by 3
Exploring the Interplay of AI Literacy, Self-Regulated Learning, and Engagement in EFL Contexts
Mu, Y., Qian, J., & Liu, M. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261476340
Liu, W. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103340 · Cited by 1
Hündür, T., & Taş, E. (2026) · Trakya Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.24315/tred.1746487 · Cited by 1
The Mediating Role of AI Anxiety in the Relationship Between AI Literacy and Career Decidedness
HOŞGÖR, H., & Sezgin, M. (2026) · Hacettepe University Journal of Education · doi:10.16986/hunefd.1765146
Ahmed, H., Riaz, H., Botchway, R. K., & Jibril, A. B. (2026) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2026.2707799
The Scale for AI Literacy in Health Care Workers: Development and Validation
Ang, C., Ito, S., Bajaj, S., Chow, M., Cleland, J., & Heaversedge, J. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/92373 · Cited by 2
Qiao, S., Nie, Y., Niu, F., He, Z., & Chen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1902647 · Cited by 1
Mutlu, N. C., & GÜMÜŞ, F. Ö. (2026) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.18.3.936
Reis, L. K., & Schütz, P. (2026) · MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung · doi:10.21240/mpaed/71/2026.08.05.x
Köylüoğlu, A. S., Efendi̇oğlu, İ. H., Villi, B., & Koç, F. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107573
Self Reflective and Trust Aware Generative Models for Human Aligned AI
Leburu, N., & Joseph, S. M. (2026) · IEEE Global Symposium on Emerging and Communication Technologies (GSEACT) · doi:10.1109/gseact68539.2026.11620076
Analysis of AI Literacy and its Role in Enhancing Accounting Students’ AI Awareness
Andrea, I. S., Tania, A., Yunita, S., & Mulyawan, A. N. (2026) · International Conferences on Information Science and System · doi:10.1109/iciss71466.2026.11715131
Xie, Z., Han, J., Kuang, D., Hu, J., Liao, C., & Wang, R. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-05215-5
Zeng, Y., Izhar, N. A., & Zeng, D. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01994-w
AI ambivalence and digital civic engagement: Dual pathways of hindrance and capability development
Kim, S. (2026) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2026.102171
Aeni, N., Hasan, M., & Dahri, N. A. (2026) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-04-2026-0768
Not All Praise Is Equal: How AI Shopping Assistants' Praise Target Shapes Consumer Behavior
Zhang, M., Cui, X., Song, Z., & Shi, Y. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.70228 · Cited by 1
Dulloo, R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8490-0.ch004
Dual pathways of generative AI use: role ambiguity and self-efficacy in employee-AI collaboration
Zhang, Q., Zhang, J.-Y., & Dong, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1793095
Artificial intelligence literacy among nursing students and its association with learning engagement
Li, M., Cao, Y., Zhang, R., Gao, J., Ma, Y., & Lan, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1928543
Gishen, Y. T., & Yin, P. (2026) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer21080272 · Cited by 1
Soliman, M., Hama, I., & Ali, R. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7292135
Zuo, J., Sun, X., & 魏子白 (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1811755
Fu, Y., Zhou, Q., Shi, G., Chen, C., Jiang, E., & Ma, J. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/9935514
Đoàn, D. M. T., Hòa, Q. M., & Nguyen, C. (2026) · Technical Education Science/Giáo dục Kỹ thuật · doi:10.54644/jte.2026.2502 · Cited by 1
Incoming Engineering Students’ GenAI Literacy: Differences Across Experience Levels
Das, U. K., Thompson, A. K., & Bego, C. R. (2026) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--59963
Are Chinese Preschoolers Ready for the AI Era? Evidence from a Large-Scale National Study in China
Luo, W., Gao, M., Xiao, J., He, H., Liu, J., & Li, H. (2026) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2026.2716775
Using Generative AI with Cognitive Scaffolding: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Engineering Education
Pan, D., Long, T., Zhu, X., & Li, J. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649586
王詩涵, Wang, Z., Yang, B., & Tang, L. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16081456
Han, S., Kang, H. S., Gimber, P., & Lim, S. (2026) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep16080292
Hoang, N. D., Phuong, N. N. T., Vy, V. T. T., Diem, H. T., Bach, P. L. T., & Danh, L. T. M. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649740
Li, W., & Jiang, Y. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649655
Liang, Z. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7328498
Liang, J., Li, M., Yang, T., Gao, X., & Liu, B. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649601
Yao, J., & Zhang, T. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649753
Teaching AI Literacy in Quantitative Experimentation Courses
Tsai, W., Janssen, A., & Borchard, L. (2026) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--60729
Dalyanci, A. A., Çelik, İ., Kontkanen, S., Laru, J., & Siklander, P. (2026) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331261479569 · Cited by 2
Xia, M., Zhu, Q., Luo, Y., Lu, S., & Lan, X. (2026) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104956
Development and validation of the adolescent artificial intelligence literacy scales
Xie, X., Ma, P., Li, Y., Fu, Z., Zhao, Y., 杜忠娟, & Zhang, W. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14136-4 · Cited by 1
Liu, H., Xue, J., Shang, X., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Li, A., & Cheng, H. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16091458
Role of AI dependency in shaping 21st century skills in higher education with AI trust as a mediator
Akter, M. S., Sultana, F., Alam, S., Rupa, R. A., & Sultana, N. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02056-8
Causal attributions for ChatGPT errors: what is the role of AI literacy?
Norcia, M., & Colí, E. (2026) · Journal of Psychology and AI · doi:10.1080/29974100.2026.2712302
Bach, N. D., & Le, H. T. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1907387
A Systematic Bibliometric Review of Artificial Intelligence and Information Literacy Research
Κουτσουπιάς, Ν., & Nosios, M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7262-4.ch001
Wang, X., Liu, X., Zhang, H., & Li, R. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10560352/v1
BODUROĞLU, E., AYHANÖZ, G. S., & ALAGÖZ, T. (2026) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1817291
Sandstrak, H. M., & Borlund, P. (2026) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-12-2025-0405
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1324-1337
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W4280549083
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 549 · 2025: 323 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 27
- FWCI
- 120.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018AAA0101700)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- AI literacy, AI literacy scale, user competence, AI awareness, AI ethics, AI evaluation, digital literacy, artificial intelligence use, human-AI interaction, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
