The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) became a part of daily life, it has become important to determine user competence in using AI technology. Here, we propose the concept of AI literacy and develop a quantitative scale for obtaining accurate data regarding the AI literacy of ordinary users. We first identified the primary core constructs of AI literacy, including awareness, use, evaluation, and ethics. Next, we generated 65 items to capture these four constructs; only 31 items were retained after a three-step content validation process. Then, we conducted a survey, and collected two samples of data. By reducing the number of items using the first sample and performing reliability and validity tests on the second sample, we obtained a 12-item instrument for the quantitative measurement of AI literacy. The results confirmed that the proposed four-construct model is an adequate representation of AI literacy. Further, AI literacy is significantly related to digital literacy, attitude towards robots, and users’ daily usage of AI. This study will not only aid researchers in understanding how user competence in using AI technology affects human–AI interactions but will also help designers develop AI applications that are aligned with the AI literacy levels of the target users.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This attitude scale was used because it is one of the shortest and, thus, one of the most resource-efficient instruments designed to capture attitudes; it had already been validated in the native language of the course participants.”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This could be an indication of discriminant validity because, in theory, AI literacy and attitudes toward AI are assumed to be two different constructs, representing cognitive/skill and affective aspects, respectively [9,16,20-22].”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“The reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions range between 0.72 and 0.76, and the overall reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency.”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al. (2022)
In the citing paper
“The Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS; Wang et al., 2023) measures AI understanding and competence across four subscales: awareness, usage, evaluation and ethics, using 12 items on a 7- point Likert scale.”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“The validity of the self-report measurement instruments for AI literacy [11,12,14,15] has only been tested regarding their factorial structure.”
From Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“It appears that individuals with higher positive attitudes, lower negative attitudes, and more willingness to use technology are also more likely to consider themselves competent [1, 46, 48].”
In the citing paper
“According to Wang et al. [47], the degree of AI literacy can determine individuals' readiness to embrace AI technologies.”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“AI literacy improves understanding of GenAI's advantages and functions, which encourages a favorable view of its acceptance and use in educational contexts [3,47,48,64].”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] affirmed a notable correlation between AI literacy and attitudes toward robots’ and users’ regular use of AI.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Higher AI literacy enables users to better understand the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies, leading to more effective adoption and usage [22,58].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] indicated that the level of AI literacy determines whether students embrace AI technologies.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Their ability to leverage the tool efficiently contributes to their perception of the AI tool as highly useful [22,58,62].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“The support for H10, which states that AI literacy positively influences the perceived value of ChatGPT, underscores the significance of students’ understanding of and familiarity with AI in appreciating the tool’s potential and contributions to their academic and personal endeavours.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Einax, J. W., Zwanziger, H. W., & Geiß, S. (1997) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,779
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
Xie, Y.-P., & Devellis, R. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075704 · Cited by 14,143
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Buckingham D., 1989, Radical Philosophy, 51, 12
- Buckingham D., 2007, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 323
- Calvani A., 2008, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4, 183
- 10.1177/002224378001700401 · DOI
- Eshet Y., 2004, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93
- Finstad K., 2010, Journal of Usability Studies, 5, 104
- Gapski, H. 2007. “Some Reflections on Digital Literacy.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Literacy.
- Gilster P., 1997, Digital Literacy
- 10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim Y., 2013, Journal of Digital Convergence, 11, 9
- Likert R., 1932, Archives of Psychology
- Mayerl J., 2016, Green European, 210
- Tarafdar M., 2019, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 37
- Wilson, H. J., and P. R. Daugherty. 2018. “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces.” Harvard Business Review .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
Zhao, Y., & Huang, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1699174 · Cited by 32
Alkhawaja, L. A., Idris, M., Al-Sayyed, S. W., & Jaber, A. M. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1691148 · Cited by 16
Asghar, M., Iqbal, J., Özbilen, F. M., Abedin, J., Järvenoja, H., & Widanapathirana, U. (2025) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-025-09695-y · Cited by 16
Chang, F., Sheng, L., & Gu, Z. (2024) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/47472 · Cited by 14
“The underlying reasons could be the diversity of personalities [33], the differences in sociocultural and socioeconomic situations [48], and the disparities in individual digital literacy [49].”
BackgroundMethodSuccess with Agile Project Management: Looking back and into the future
Koudriachov, C., Tam, C., & Aparício, M. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2025.112428 · Cited by 15
Skalka, J., Przybyła‐Kasperek, M., Smyrnova‐Trybulska, E., Klimeš, C., Farana, R., Dagienė, V., & Dolgopolovas, V. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3573575 · Cited by 21
Development and validation of a short AI literacy test (AILIT-S) for university students
Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., Schiff, D. S., & Nerdel, C. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100176 · Cited by 17
Yavuz, M., Balat, Ş., & Kayalı, B. (2025) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.811 · Cited by 21
AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Systematic Approach to Questionnaire Development and Validation
Ranieri, M., Biagini, G., & Cuomo, S. (2025) · International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence · doi:10.4018/ijdldc.388469 · Cited by 15
Yang, H., Xu, N., Lin, X., & Zhang, W. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100833 · Cited by 22
Assessing students’ DRIVE: A framework to evaluate learning through interactions with generative AI
Oliveira, M., Zednik, C., Bombaerts, G. J. T., Sadowski, B. M., & Conijn, R. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100497 · Cited by 23
A Psychometric Validation of the PAILQ-6: Perceived Artificial Intelligence Literacy Questionnaire
Grassini, S. (2024) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3679318.3685359 · Cited by 23
Wu, D., Sun, X., Liang, S., Qiu, C., & Wei, Z. (2025) · Frontiers of digital education. · doi:10.1007/s44366-025-0039-x · Cited by 18
Li, F., Yan, X., Su, H., Shen, R., & Mao, G. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13060062 · Cited by 14
The Effect of AI Education on Nursing Student AI Literacy and Anxiety
LaGore, A., Colby, L., Sinsabaugh, K., Grobbel, C. C., & Piscotty, R. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20250415-04 · Cited by 16
Gao, Y., & Wang, X. (2026) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688261416208 · Cited by 17
Samman, A. A. A., & Mohamed, A. (2024) · 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS) · doi:10.1109/icetsis61505.2024.10459667 · Cited by 12
Rad, H. S., Alipour, J., Jafarpour, A., & Hashemian, M. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103454 · Cited by 20
Dağaşan, A. (2025) · International Journal Of Turkish Literature Culture Education · doi:10.7884/teke.1628023 · Cited by 13
Cheng, J.-Y., Devkota, A., Gheisari, M., Jeelani, I., & Franz, B. W. (2025) · Journal of Civil Engineering Education · doi:10.1061/jceecd.eieng-2223 · Cited by 14
The impact of AI-based visual designs on students’ AI literacy and attitudes toward AI
Akman, E. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2530630 · Cited by 14
AILIS 1.0: A new framework to measure AI literacy in library and information science (LIS)
Montesi, M., Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Bautista‐Puig, N., Ochando, M. B., & Díez, A. S. (2025) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103118 · Cited by 17
Held, P., & Heubeck, T. (2025) · Digital Business · doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100149 · Cited by 15
Lin, X., Xu, G., & Xiong, B. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332175 · Cited by 32
Clashing AIs: Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Academic Integrity in an EFL Context
Uygun, E. (2025) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09676-2 · Cited by 18
Wang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2025) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-025-01060-3 · Cited by 18
Lan, X., Li, M., Wang, Y., Chen, M., Jiang, H., Lu, S., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100482 · Cited by 18
Teachers' Perception Scale Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education
Işık, S., Çakır, R., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2024) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.24.95.11.6 · Cited by 15
The AI Double Standard: Humans Judge All AIs for the Actions of One
Manoli, A., Pauketat, J. V. T., & Anthis, J. R. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711083 · Cited by 12
A scoping review of empirical research on AI literacy assessments
Su, J., Chen, X., Chu, S. K. W., & Hu, X. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10515-9 · Cited by 16
The literacy paradox: How AI literacy amplifies biases in evaluating AI-generated news articles
Kim, W., & Ryoo, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102992 · Cited by 18
Gong, Y., Wang, M., He, L., Xu, C., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331251396354 · Cited by 18
Chen, X., & Xiao, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1623730 · Cited by 17
Research on artificial intelligence literacy among nursing professionals: a scoping review
Wang, Q., Lu, N., Yu, C., Qi, J., Zhang, H., & Shi, H. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04448-8 · Cited by 16
Sarwari, A. Q., & Adnan, H. M. (2024) · Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research · doi:10.25082/amler.2024.01.004 · Cited by 12
Yaşar, H., & Karagücük, V. (2024) · International Journal of Languages Education · doi:10.71084/ijlet.1561914 · Cited by 16
The Impact of Digital Safety Competence on Cognitive Competence, AI Self-Efficacy, and Character
Ma, C. M. S., Shek, D. T. L., Fan, I. Y. H., Zhu, X., & Hu, X. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15105440 · Cited by 21
Passlack, N., Hammerschmidt, T., & Posegga, O. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10648-5 · Cited by 12
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Future of Information Privacy
Akakpo, A., Gyasi, E. A., Oduro, B., & Akpabot, S. (2025) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.383050 · Cited by 15
Zhang, D., Yang, H., He, Y., & Guo, W. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13715-1 · Cited by 16
Zhang, Y., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Li, S., Yang, Q., Zhang, J., & Lu, Z. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13100855 · Cited by 16
Co-Creating With AI: How Communication Students Learn, Think, and Rely on Intelligent Systems
Lin, L. C.-S. (2025) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331251385944 · Cited by 14
Cheng, S., Cao, R., & Rashid, S. M. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05872-y · Cited by 18
Topal, A. D., Gökçe, A. T., Eren, C. D., & Geçer, A. K. (2024) · Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age · doi:10.53850/joltida.1440845 · Cited by 15
KEY COMPETENCES FOR THE ADOPTION OF AI-BASED INNOVATIONS IN ORGANISATIONS
Baumgartner, M., Horvat, D., Kinkel, S., & Kick, E. (2024) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919624400024 · Cited by 12
Teacher AI literacy: a theoretical conceptualisation
Tikhonova, N., & Sabirova, D. R. (2025) · The Education and science journal · doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2025-6-180-206 · Cited by 20
Kisilowska, M. (2025) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103114 · Cited by 15
Developing and validating an AI literacy scale for university students in Vietnam
Do, H. V., Bui, T. T., Hoa Tran, D., Nguyen, H. T., & Dinh, L. D. (2026) · IFLA Journal · doi:10.1177/03400352251385058 · Cited by 11
Development and validation of the Generative AI Literacy for Learning Scale (GenAI-LLs)
Gümüş, M. M., & KARA, M. (2025) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.10236 · Cited by 31
Lee, S. Y., & Liu, W. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102308 · Cited by 14
Yang, P., Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21795-9 · Cited by 17
A multidimensional study of AI adoption among University students in teacher education programs
Bećirović, S., Polz, E., & Tinkel, I. (2025) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-025-00422-0 · Cited by 16
Bellibaş, M. Ş., Özgenel, M., & Bozkurt, A. (2025) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-025-01059-w · Cited by 19
Li, C., Tsuei, S. H., & Wu, H. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/80604 · Cited by 12
Human–AI synergy: finding cognitive balance in idea generation for product innovation
Cristofaro, M., & Giardino, P. L. (2025) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-03-2025-0312 · Cited by 14
Pierre, L., Wang, J., & Zambrano, V. C. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2025.2609808 · Cited by 11
Wang, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1761562 · Cited by 16
Using the Theoretical-Experiential Binomial for Educating AI-Literate Students
Modran, H. A., Ursuțiu, D., & Samoilă, C. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16104068 · Cited by 10
Han, S., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2025.2456051 · Cited by 11
Skills and AI literacy of engineering students
Bui, T. T., Do, S. H., & Dinh, L. D. (2025) · IFLA Journal · doi:10.1177/03400352241310495 · Cited by 11
Bilişim Alanında Öğrenim Gören Öğrencilerin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Düzeylerinin Ölçülmesi
Güler, A., & Polatgıl, M. (2025) · Journal of Computer and Education Research · doi:10.18009/jcer.1549267 · Cited by 13
Lauderdale, S. A., Schmitt, R., Wuckovich, B., Dalal, N., Desai, H., & Tomlinson, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1544951 · Cited by 14
AI literacy as a key driver of user experience in AI-powered assessment: insights from Socratic mind
Soylu, M. Y., Lee, J., Hung, J.-T., Cui, C., & Joyner, D. A. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2564739 · Cited by 23
Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Lutz, C. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05978-3 · Cited by 42
Torres-Gómez, A. (2024) · Investigación Bibliotecológica Archivonomía Bibliotecología e Información · doi:10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2024.98.58852 · Cited by 21
Jiang, Q., Qian, J., & Zang, Y. (2024) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-02-2024-0471 · Cited by 10
Guidi, S., Bracci, M., Currò, F., Innocenti, A., Lusuardi, L. M., Marchigiani, E., Palmitesta, P., Sirizzotti, M., & Parlangeli, O. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2457563 · Cited by 10
Zhou, X., Gong, Y., Zhou, Y., Jiang, Y., & Bai, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103462 · Cited by 12
Lee, J.-H., & Jeon, J. (2025) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602381.2025.2487780 · Cited by 9
Lauderdale, S. A., Griffin, S. A., Lahman, K. R., Mbaba, E., & Tomlinson, S. (2025) · Personality and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/pmh.70018 · Cited by 12
Oubibi, M. (2025) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-025-00364-z · Cited by 12
Tomczyk, Ł. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95627-0_12 · Cited by 13
Grassini, S., Thorp, S. O., Cipriani, E., Mannari, V., & Sevic, A. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100834 · Cited by 11
Choe, J., & Woo, K. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03985-y · Cited by 12
Hou, Y. (2025) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-025-01603-z · Cited by 20
Sun, Y., Li, L., Zhang, X., Chen, X., Deng, S., & Hu, X. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-03989-6 · Cited by 15
Canbeldek, M., Erol, A., Erol, M., & Budak, K. S. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2619035 · Cited by 12
Montag, C., & Ali, R. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3325511/v1 · Cited by 9
ActiveAI: The Effectiveness of an Interactive Tutoring System in Developing K-12 AI Literacy
Tseng, Y.-J., Yadav, G., Hou, X., Wu, M., Chou, Y.-S., Chen, C. C., Wu, C.-C., Chen, S.-G., Lin, Y.-J., Liao, G., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_31 · Cited by 8
Evaluation of ChatGPT Usage in Preschool Education: Teacher Perspectives
Uğraş, M. (2024) · Eğitim Ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi Teori Ve Uygulama · doi:10.58689/eibd.1537337 · Cited by 17
Yang, H., Zhang, D., Guo, W., & He, Y. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3512499 · Cited by 10
Mudunuri, L. N. R., Hullurappa, M., Vemula, V. R., & Selvakumar, P. (2024) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8442-8.ch006 · Cited by 22
The Measurement of Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence: An Overview and Recommendations
Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2024) · Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70355-3_2 · Cited by 8
Exploring students’ views on information literacy skills training in higher education
Mwiiyale, J. M., Hamutumwa, N. M., & Shatona, M. (2025) · The Reference Librarian · doi:10.1080/02763877.2025.2481088 · Cited by 8
Buckley, C., Norman, M. L. P., Troy, C. L. C., Yang, Y., Bao, J. A., Overton, H. K., & Jung, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2025.2514276 · Cited by 11
Uğraş, M., Çakır, Z., Zacharis, G., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14090368 · Cited by 12
Chen, C. (2025) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-025-00372-z · Cited by 12
Assessing AI literacy in second language writing: a scale development and validation study
Huang, Z., Nazar, N., Abbas, G., & Jiang, Z. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13767-3 · Cited by 12
Lu, G., Ba, S., & Yang, L. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13778-0 · Cited by 13
Dodur, H. M. S. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70276 · Cited by 13
Chen, X., Wang, Y., & Sun, X. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-05-2025-0834 · Cited by 8
Zhang, L., Fang, C., Lin, H., Liang, G., & Luo, S. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102020 · Cited by 9
Baimukhambetova, K., Ыбыраимжанов, К., Moldabek, K., Borashkyzy, A. U., Zhetkizgenova, A., & Uaidullakyzy, E. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010043 · Cited by 8
Obadă, D.-R., Grădinaru, C., & Grădinaru, I.-A. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2025.1722464 · Cited by 14
Zhang, L., & Chen, S. C. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13880-3 · Cited by 21
Wang, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70217 · Cited by 9
Won, J., & Lee, C. H. (2026) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-10-2025-0937 · Cited by 10
Enhancing AI Literacy of Undergraduate Students Using Construction Safety Context
Cheng, J.-Y., Devkota, A., Gheisari, M., & Jeelani, I. (2024) · ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) · doi:10.1061/9780784485293.005 · Cited by 9
Effect of AI literacy on online information search competencies among medical students in Pakistan
Ali, M., & Mughari, S. (2024) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669241299765 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1324-1337
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W4280549083
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 549 · 2025: 323 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 27
- FWCI
- 120.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018AAA0101700)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- AI literacy, AI literacy scale, user competence, AI awareness, AI ethics, AI evaluation, digital literacy, artificial intelligence use, human-AI interaction, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
