The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) became a part of daily life, it has become important to determine user competence in using AI technology. Here, we propose the concept of AI literacy and develop a quantitative scale for obtaining accurate data regarding the AI literacy of ordinary users. We first identified the primary core constructs of AI literacy, including awareness, use, evaluation, and ethics. Next, we generated 65 items to capture these four constructs; only 31 items were retained after a three-step content validation process. Then, we conducted a survey, and collected two samples of data. By reducing the number of items using the first sample and performing reliability and validity tests on the second sample, we obtained a 12-item instrument for the quantitative measurement of AI literacy. The results confirmed that the proposed four-construct model is an adequate representation of AI literacy. Further, AI literacy is significantly related to digital literacy, attitude towards robots, and users’ daily usage of AI. This study will not only aid researchers in understanding how user competence in using AI technology affects human–AI interactions but will also help designers develop AI applications that are aligned with the AI literacy levels of the target users.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This attitude scale was used because it is one of the shortest and, thus, one of the most resource-efficient instruments designed to capture attitudes; it had already been validated in the native language of the course participants.”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This could be an indication of discriminant validity because, in theory, AI literacy and attitudes toward AI are assumed to be two different constructs, representing cognitive/skill and affective aspects, respectively [9,16,20-22].”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“The reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions range between 0.72 and 0.76, and the overall reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency.”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al. (2022)
In the citing paper
“The Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS; Wang et al., 2023) measures AI understanding and competence across four subscales: awareness, usage, evaluation and ethics, using 12 items on a 7- point Likert scale.”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“The validity of the self-report measurement instruments for AI literacy [11,12,14,15] has only been tested regarding their factorial structure.”
From Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“It appears that individuals with higher positive attitudes, lower negative attitudes, and more willingness to use technology are also more likely to consider themselves competent [1, 46, 48].”
In the citing paper
“According to Wang et al. [47], the degree of AI literacy can determine individuals' readiness to embrace AI technologies.”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“AI literacy improves understanding of GenAI's advantages and functions, which encourages a favorable view of its acceptance and use in educational contexts [3,47,48,64].”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] affirmed a notable correlation between AI literacy and attitudes toward robots’ and users’ regular use of AI.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Higher AI literacy enables users to better understand the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies, leading to more effective adoption and usage [22,58].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] indicated that the level of AI literacy determines whether students embrace AI technologies.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Their ability to leverage the tool efficiently contributes to their perception of the AI tool as highly useful [22,58,62].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“The support for H10, which states that AI literacy positively influences the perceived value of ChatGPT, underscores the significance of students’ understanding of and familiarity with AI in appreciating the tool’s potential and contributions to their academic and personal endeavours.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Einax, J. W., Zwanziger, H. W., & Geiß, S. (1997) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,779
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
Xie, Y.-P., & Devellis, R. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075704 · Cited by 14,143
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Buckingham D., 1989, Radical Philosophy, 51, 12
- Buckingham D., 2007, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 323
- Calvani A., 2008, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4, 183
- 10.1177/002224378001700401 · DOI
- Eshet Y., 2004, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93
- Finstad K., 2010, Journal of Usability Studies, 5, 104
- Gapski, H. 2007. “Some Reflections on Digital Literacy.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Literacy.
- Gilster P., 1997, Digital Literacy
- 10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim Y., 2013, Journal of Digital Convergence, 11, 9
- Likert R., 1932, Archives of Psychology
- Mayerl J., 2016, Green European, 210
- Tarafdar M., 2019, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 37
- Wilson, H. J., and P. R. Daugherty. 2018. “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces.” Harvard Business Review .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,003
Zhang, T., & Tong, Q. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2429889 · Cited by 39
Polat, E. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13548-y · Cited by 51
Artificial intelligence literacy: a proposed faceted taxonomy
Shiri, A. A. (2024) · Digital Library Perspectives · doi:10.1108/dlp-04-2024-0067 · Cited by 58
Yue, M., Jong, M. S., Dai, Y., & Lau, W. W. F. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2025.2449942 · Cited by 49
Zhao, J. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102152 · Cited by 40
Si, J. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07766-8 · Cited by 46
Türk, N., Batuk, B., Kaya, A., & Yıldırım, O. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03559-2 · Cited by 38
Boztepe, H., Akdeniz Kudubeş, A., Semerci Şahin, R., Durmuş Sarıkahya, S., & Çınar Özbay, S. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104568 · Cited by 38
Qi, J., Liu, J., & Xu, Y. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15030328 · Cited by 45
Sun, C., Zhao, X., Guo, B., & Chen, N. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15050648 · Cited by 52
Zeng, Q., Huang, X., Zhu, J., Su, S., Hu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1622802 · Cited by 42
Duong, C. D. (2025) · Industry and Higher Education · doi:10.1177/09504222251370089 · Cited by 49
Ning, Y., Zheng, H., Wu, H., Jin, Z. M., Chang, H., & Wijaya, T. T. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13477-w · Cited by 43
Liu, J. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2544006 · Cited by 43
Liu, S., Xiao, Y., Nie, M., Yuan, X.-Q., Wang, L., Wang, M., & Wu, Z. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04142-1 · Cited by 43
Building AI Literacy for Sustainable Teacher Education
Rütti-Joy, O., Winder, G., & Biedermann, H. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung · doi:10.21240/zfhe/18-04/10 · Cited by 57
Çayak, S. (2024) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.1490307 · Cited by 47
Xu, L., Zhang, L., Ling, O., & Wang, D. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101227 · Cited by 32
Börekci, C., & Çelik, Ö. (2024) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.1468866 · Cited by 42
Young children’s understanding of AI
Heeg, D. M., & Avraamidou, L. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13169-x · Cited by 39
Cypriot teachers’ digital skills and attitudes towards AI
Kasinidou, M., Kleanthoys, S., & Otterbacher, J. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00390-6 · Cited by 44
Attitudes and anxiety levels of nursing students toward artificial intelligence
Sarman, A., & Tuncay, S. (2024) · Teaching and learning in nursing · doi:10.1016/j.teln.2024.12.006 · Cited by 43
On the verge of a digital divide in the use of generative AI?
Suárez, D., & García-Mariñoso, B. (2025) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102997 · Cited by 37
AcademAI: Investigating AI Usage, Attitudes, and Literacy in Higher Education and Research
Brown, R., Sillence, E., & Branley-Bell, D. (2025) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/00472395251347304 · Cited by 43
Kong, S. C., & Zhu, J. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100447 · Cited by 52
AI literacy as a core component of AI education
Tadimalla, S. Y., & Maher, M. L. (2025) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.70007 · Cited by 59
Su, J. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12611-4 · Cited by 40
Pan, M., Li, D., Wu, H., & Lei, P. (2024) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103535 · Cited by 31
Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Lifelong Learning Self Efficacy: Usage and Competence Scale
Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2024) · Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.51535/tell.1489304 · Cited by 32
Yang, Q., & Lee, Y. (2024) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm17100470 · Cited by 47
Yang, Y., & Kim, M.-Y. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17010125 · Cited by 33
Duong, C. D. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100349 · Cited by 29
Du, Y., Li, T., & Gao, C. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.08.010 · Cited by 28
Haque, A. B., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Mikalef, P. (2024) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-024-00741-z · Cited by 35
A comparative analysis of pre-service teachers’ readiness for AI integration
Lucas, M., Bem‐Haja, P., Zhang, Y., Cejudo, M. D. C. L., & Palacios‐Rodríguez, A. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100396 · Cited by 57
Effect of AI literacy on work performance among medical librarians in Pakistan
Mughari, S., Rafique, G. M., & Ali, M. A. (2024) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102918 · Cited by 31
Köhler, C., & Hartig, J. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/15144 · Cited by 88
Capability-based training framework for generative AI in higher education
Burneo, P. S., de Lira, Y. R., Murzi, H., Balula, A., & Costa, A. P. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1594199 · Cited by 45
A Modern Teacher’s Competence in the Field of Artificial Intelligence: Structure and Content
Sysoyev, P. V. (2025) · Высшее образование в России · doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-58-79 · Cited by 27
Zhang, X., Hu, X., Sun, Y., Li, L., Deng, S., & Chen, X. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15101398 · Cited by 35
Jia, J., Ning, X., & Liu, W. (2025) · Journal of Digital Management · doi:10.1007/s44362-025-00016-3 · Cited by 41
Yan, W., Liu, Y.-L., Mamaeva, V., Dong, F., Tao, G., Li, R., & Yang, H. (2026) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103117 · Cited by 28
Service staff makes me nervous: Exploring the impact of insecure attachment on AI service preference
Deng, S., Zhang, J., Lin, Z., & Li, X. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122946 · Cited by 26
Drivers of Chatbot Adoption among K–12 Teachers in Saudi Arabia
Al-Amri, N. A., & Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14091034 · Cited by 31
Development and validation of the prompt engineering competence scale (PECS)
Gibreel, O., & Arpacı, İ. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251336455 · Cited by 27
Exploring emergent AI-TPACK competencies in a two-week AI literacy module for preservice teachers
Aldemir, T., Bicer, A., Kilinc, S., Moon, J., & Kwok, M. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2025.105231 · Cited by 27
“Developing AI literacy is crucial: higher AI knowledge is associated with greater readiness to adopt AI tools, fewer misconceptions, and a higher perceived usefulness (Al-Abdullatif, 2024; Wang et al., 2022).”
AI’s Influence on Human Creative Agency
Watkins, R., & Barak-Medina, E. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2437264 · Cited by 30
Beninger, S., Reppel, A. E., Stanton, J. V., & Watson, F. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/02734753251316569 · Cited by 36
Pan, L., Luo, H., & Gu, Q. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3546572 · Cited by 29
Perceived artificial intelligence literacy and employability of university students
Wut, T. M., Chan, E. A.-H., Wong, H. S.-M., & Chan, J. K. Y. (2025) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-06-2024-0272 · Cited by 40
Lu, G., & Ba, S. (2026) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2489784 · Cited by 24
Wut, T.-M., Ka-man Sum, C., & Shun-mun Wong, H. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13685-4 · Cited by 24
Sultan, Y., Dautova, G., & Dalle, J. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies · doi:10.29333/ejecs/2839 · Cited by 28
Teachers’ artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: an exploratory study
Deshen, M., Harari, R., & Aharony, N. (2026) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-026-00433-5 · Cited by 40
Low, M. P., Wut, T. M., Lau, T. C., & Tong, W. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07434-6 · Cited by 24
Mah, D.-K., Knoth, N., & Egloffstein, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1484904 · Cited by 39
Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13060490 · Cited by 49
Bewersdorff, A., Nerdel, C., & Zhaı, X. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100493 · Cited by 36
Xiao-hua, L., Xiao, Y., & Li, D. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00567-5 · Cited by 35
Üzüm, B., Elçiçek, M., & Pesen, A. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2385518 · Cited by 34
Overview and confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis of AI literacy scale
Koch, M. J., Wienrich, C., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Carolus, A. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100310 · Cited by 29
Gupta, S., & Jaiswal, R. (2024) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101070 · Cited by 22
Kong, S. C., Zhu, J., & Yang, Y. N. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100359 · Cited by 28
Montag, C., & Ali, R. (2025) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00481-7 · Cited by 34
Tsai, C., Lee, L., Lin, M. Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-P., Lin, C.-H., & Tsai, M. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105305 · Cited by 29
Factors influencing international students’ adoption of generative artificial intelligence
Ittefaq, M., Zain, A., Arif, R., Taufiq, A., Khan, M. L., & Seo, H. (2025) · Journal of International Students · doi:10.32674/fnwdpn48 · Cited by 29
Kong, J., Liu, J., Chen, G., & Shang, W. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13753-9 · Cited by 26
ChatGPT in early childhood STEM education: Can it be an innovative tool to overcome challenges?
Uğraş, H., & Uğraş, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12960-0 · Cited by 23
Can GPT-4 Replicate Empirical Software Engineering Research?
Liang, J. T., Badea, C., Bird, C., DeLine, R., Ford, D., Forsgren, N., & Zimmermann, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3660767 · Cited by 19
Seker, O., Kwon, K., & Kocak, O. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251336368 · Cited by 21
Bayram, H. M., & Öztürkcan, A. (2024) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2024-0158 · Cited by 21
Yu, R., Xu, X., & Peng, S. (2025) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103745 · Cited by 22
Özüdoğru, G., & Durak, H. Y. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251335657 · Cited by 40
Wang, C., Chen, Y., Hu, Z., Li, Y., & Gu, X. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10535-5 · Cited by 25
Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Lutz, C. (2024) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/bvyku · Cited by 20
Mixed methods assessment of the influence of demographics on medical advice of ChatGPT
Andreadis, K., Newman, D. R., Twan, C., Shunk, A., Mann, D. M., & Stevens, E. R. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae086 · Cited by 20
Hobeika, E., Hallit, R. R., Malaeb, D. N., Sakr, F., Dabbous, M., Merdad, N., Rashid, T., Amin, R., Jebreen, K., Zarrouq, B., et al. (2024) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2024.2395637 · Cited by 23
Chen, Y. H., & Zhang, K. (2024) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22806 · Cited by 27
Kaya, B., Çınar, S., & Önder, F. C. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2499162 · Cited by 21
Berdida, D. J. E., Grande, R. A. N., Serag, R. M., & Fathy, D. M. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104673 · Cited by 28
Zhu, S., Li, R., Ren, X., Huo, J., Tan, Q., Hu, X., Wang, L., Huang, L., & Luo, A. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04331-6 · Cited by 21
Zaidi, S. Y. A., Ahmad, B., Aslam, M. F., Mahmood, F., Raza, S. B., & Zafar, M. (2024) · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · doi:10.1002/joe.22275 · Cited by 29
AI Adoption in Higher Education: Advancing Sustainable Energy Management in Palestinian Universities
Ayyash, M., & Salah, O. (2025) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100534 · Cited by 18
Dalvi‐Esfahani, M., ahmadabadi, H. B., Ramayah, T., Turner, J. J., Iahad, N. A., & Azar, N. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124291 · Cited by 23
Cristofaro, M., Giardino, P. L., & Muldoon, J. E. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103200 · Cited by 19
Luo, Y., & Day, M. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-13931-3 · Cited by 28
Shahzad, K., Khan, S. A., & Iqbal, A. (2024) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-02-2024-0107 · Cited by 19
Sidra, S., & Mason, C. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00211 · Cited by 31
Lu, K., Zhu, J., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10434-1 · Cited by 29
El‐Sayed, A. A. I., Alsenany, S. A., Badoman, T. E. A., & Asal, M. G. R. (2025) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.70140 · Cited by 19
Meegan, J., & Young, K. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-025-09875-1 · Cited by 42
Testa, M., Apuzzo, A., & Pittaway, L. (2026) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2026.101394 · Cited by 32
AICOMP - Future Skills in a World Increasingly Shaped By AI
Ehlers, U., Lindner, M., Sommer, S., & Rauch, E. (2023) · Ubiquity Proceedings · doi:10.5334/uproc.91 · Cited by 22
Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması
Erdoğan, T. E., & EKŞİOĞLU, S. (2024) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1496716 · Cited by 18
Ahmad, Z., Sultana, A., Latheef, N. A., Siby, N., Sellami, A., & Abbasi, S. A. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105446 · Cited by 28
Augmenting diversity in hiring decisions with artificial intelligence tools
Wilkens, U., Lutzeyer, I., Zheng, C. S.-M., Beşer, A., & Prilla, M. (2025) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2025.2492867 · Cited by 21
Hershkovitz, A., Tabach, M., Reich, Y., Lurie, L., & Cholcman, T. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13070518 · Cited by 26
Zhu, Y., & Siquan, X. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70160 · Cited by 23
Liu, C., Yang, L., Dong, X., & Li, X. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13080639 · Cited by 16
Qiu, S. S., Zhang, L., You, F., & Zhao, X. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108790 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1324-1337
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W4280549083
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 549 · 2025: 323 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 27
- FWCI
- 120.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018AAA0101700)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- AI literacy, AI literacy scale, user competence, AI awareness, AI ethics, AI evaluation, digital literacy, artificial intelligence use, human-AI interaction, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
