The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) became a part of daily life, it has become important to determine user competence in using AI technology. Here, we propose the concept of AI literacy and develop a quantitative scale for obtaining accurate data regarding the AI literacy of ordinary users. We first identified the primary core constructs of AI literacy, including awareness, use, evaluation, and ethics. Next, we generated 65 items to capture these four constructs; only 31 items were retained after a three-step content validation process. Then, we conducted a survey, and collected two samples of data. By reducing the number of items using the first sample and performing reliability and validity tests on the second sample, we obtained a 12-item instrument for the quantitative measurement of AI literacy. The results confirmed that the proposed four-construct model is an adequate representation of AI literacy. Further, AI literacy is significantly related to digital literacy, attitude towards robots, and users’ daily usage of AI. This study will not only aid researchers in understanding how user competence in using AI technology affects human–AI interactions but will also help designers develop AI applications that are aligned with the AI literacy levels of the target users.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This attitude scale was used because it is one of the shortest and, thus, one of the most resource-efficient instruments designed to capture attitudes; it had already been validated in the native language of the course participants.”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This could be an indication of discriminant validity because, in theory, AI literacy and attitudes toward AI are assumed to be two different constructs, representing cognitive/skill and affective aspects, respectively [9,16,20-22].”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“The reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions range between 0.72 and 0.76, and the overall reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scale is 0.84, indicating good internal consistency.”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al. (2022)
In the citing paper
“The Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS; Wang et al., 2023) measures AI understanding and competence across four subscales: awareness, usage, evaluation and ethics, using 12 items on a 7- point Likert scale.”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“The validity of the self-report measurement instruments for AI literacy [11,12,14,15] has only been tested regarding their factorial structure.”
From Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“It appears that individuals with higher positive attitudes, lower negative attitudes, and more willingness to use technology are also more likely to consider themselves competent [1, 46, 48].”
In the citing paper
“According to Wang et al. [47], the degree of AI literacy can determine individuals' readiness to embrace AI technologies.”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“AI literacy improves understanding of GenAI's advantages and functions, which encourages a favorable view of its acceptance and use in educational contexts [3,47,48,64].”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] affirmed a notable correlation between AI literacy and attitudes toward robots’ and users’ regular use of AI.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Higher AI literacy enables users to better understand the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies, leading to more effective adoption and usage [22,58].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [58] indicated that the level of AI literacy determines whether students embrace AI technologies.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Their ability to leverage the tool efficiently contributes to their perception of the AI tool as highly useful [22,58,62].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“The support for H10, which states that AI literacy positively influences the perceived value of ChatGPT, underscores the significance of students’ understanding of and familiarity with AI in appreciating the tool’s potential and contributions to their academic and personal endeavours.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
Einax, J. W., Zwanziger, H. W., & Geiß, S. (1997) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,779
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
Xie, Y.-P., & Devellis, R. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075704 · Cited by 14,143
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Buckingham D., 1989, Radical Philosophy, 51, 12
- Buckingham D., 2007, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 323
- Calvani A., 2008, Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4, 183
- 10.1177/002224378001700401 · DOI
- Eshet Y., 2004, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93
- Finstad K., 2010, Journal of Usability Studies, 5, 104
- Gapski, H. 2007. “Some Reflections on Digital Literacy.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Literacy.
- Gilster P., 1997, Digital Literacy
- 10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim Y., 2013, Journal of Digital Convergence, 11, 9
- Likert R., 1932, Archives of Psychology
- Mayerl J., 2016, Green European, 210
- Tarafdar M., 2019, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 37
- Wilson, H. J., and P. R. Daugherty. 2018. “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces.” Harvard Business Review .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Hu, H., Liu, Y., Kong, W., & Li, Z. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16071198 · Cited by 1
Mosia, M. S., Nannim, F. A., & Egara, F. O. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100650 · Cited by 1
Zhang, W., & Hu, J. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2698253 · Cited by 2
崔晓慧, & Khan, T. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1896371 · Cited by 1
Zeng, Q., Zhang, S., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Yang, M., & Hu, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1918134 · Cited by 1
AI ‐Driven Instruction and Its Influence on EFL Learners' Self‐Efficacy, Self‐Regulation, and Grit
Li, L., & Wang, Y. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70801 · Cited by 1
Liu, Y., Zhang, M., & Peng, Y. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0355186 · Cited by 1
Yingqi, D., Zhao, X., Pan, X., & Wei, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1880523 · Cited by 2
Camarillo, M. G., & Wilson, C. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2719726 · Cited by 1
Masalimova, A. R., ZHELTUKHINA, M. R., Demir, S., Molodozhnikova, N. M., Zvereva, E., Berechikidze, I. A., & Lazareva, Y. B. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1888712 · Cited by 3
Qin, Q., Sun, W., Hu, H., Du, Y., & Chen, C. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/8230166 · Cited by 1
Su, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1955418 · Cited by 3
Tang, Z., Song, S., Chen, X., Qin, J., Li, Y., Yu, J., Chen, Y., Liu, H., & 陶香香 (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1963947 · Cited by 1
-, M. M., -, R. A. M., -, D. M. M., & -, M. B. (2024) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.12894 · Cited by 1
Student Competencies for Online Learning
Stephen, J. S. (2024) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54439-2_5 · Cited by 2
Guidi, S., Bracci, M., Currò, F., Innocenti, A., Lusuardi, L., Marchigiani, E., Palmitesta, P., Sirizzotti, M., & Parlangeli, O. (2024) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3673805.3673820 · Cited by 1
Generating a Deepfake Frame : A Text Mining Study Based on Reddit
Zhou, G., & Qiao, F. (2025) · KOME · doi:10.17646/kome.of.22 · Cited by 1
Li, C., Long, J., Guan, N., Wang, Y., Liang, W., & Li, C. F. (2024) · International Conference on Education, Network and Information Technology (ICENIT) · doi:10.1109/icenit61951.2024.00039 · Cited by 1
Yang, Q., Lu, G., Ba, S., Cui, L., & Wang, L. (2025) · International Symposium on Educational Technology · doi:10.1109/iset65607.2025.00015 · Cited by 1
Sun, L., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2026.2711656 · Cited by 1
Exploring Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ AI Literacy in ChatGPT-Assisted Science Lesson Design
Choi, Y., & Kim, M.-C. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16081275 · Cited by 2
Alshahrani, B. T., Karimi, F., & Pileggi, S. F. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01458-1 · Cited by 1
Haidar, R., & Tassis, A. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7014667/v1 · Cited by 1
AI literacy: An essential competency for pediatric nursing
Chamblee, T. B. (2026) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2026.01.036 · Cited by 1
We Are Equally Vulnerable? An Examination of the Third-Person Effect in AI-Generated Misinformation
Fu, B., & Li, X. (2026) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051261452019
“AI literacy is defined as “the ability to properly identify, use, and evaluate AI-related products under the premise of ethical standards” (Wang et al., 2023).”
Reframing AI Literacy in Higher Education: Designing Curricula for Ethically Competent Managers
Confetto, M. G., Covucci, C., Manta, O., & Califri, C. (2026) · Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1177/10525629261468213
Mies-Padilla, S., Rodríguez-Suárez, C.-A., & González-de la Torre, H. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17090914
Kompetenzfelder künftiger Beschäftigter im Bereich Künstlicher Intelligenz
Neuhaus, U., Schulz, M., Schröder, H., & Herrmann, F. (2024) · HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik · doi:10.1365/s40702-024-01046-7
Oliinyk, I. V., Булавіна, О., Romanenko, T., Татарнікова, А., & Smirnov, A. (2024) · Revista de la Universidad del Zulia · doi:10.46925//rdluz.43.22
A Holistic Perspective on the AI-Education Nexus: A Science Mapping Study
Bardakçı, S. (2024) · Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.46778/goputeb.1522277
Artificial Intelligence Experiences of Pre-Service Preschool Teachers
Aydin, F., Budak, K. S., Polat, E. B., Engin, K., & Ulutaş, İ. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3944-2.ch003
An Overview of Teaching AI Literacy to University Students
Nganji, J. T., Al-Qora’n, L. F., & Nsangong, K. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83608-852-320241002 · Cited by 2
张, 可. (2024) · Advances in Education · doi:10.12677/ae.2024.14122236 · Cited by 1
Kim, D., Kang, S., & Hong, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5066496
Total Quality Management and Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Lira City, UgandaPreprint
Bolatito, A.-O. S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5086072
Pinski, M., Hofmann, T., & Benlian, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80125-9_13
Lepage, A., & Roy, N. (2024) · Mesure et évaluation en éducation · doi:10.7202/1117467ar · Cited by 3
Teaching Reform of the “Principles of Management” Course in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
He, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Higher education and practice. · doi:10.62381/h241604
Jiang, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence (ICIEAI) · doi:10.1145/3724504.3724530
Bachmann, P., Griesser, S., Mohr, S., Rast, V., Stutz, N., & Zeder, R. (2025) · Europäische Kulturen in der Wirtschaftskommunikation · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-47591-8_9
Ai, P., Li, B. J., Hu, B., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2517211
Krsmanovic, I. M., & Archan, D. A. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5477-3.ch006
De lo técnico a lo pedagógico: formación docente integral en IA universitaria
Cuevas, J. P. G. (2025) · Company games & business simulation academic journal. · doi:10.54988/cg.2025.1.1702 · Cited by 2
An Evaluation of Ai Literacy in University StudentsPreprint
Verduga-Alcívar, D. A., Cao, E. R., & Cossío, N. S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5346641
Li, C., Tsuei, S. H., & Wu, H. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.80604
Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Research Status Based on Clustering
Wu, Y., Yang, W., Ji, T., Luo, Y., Lin, Y., Yang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd64986.2025.11081974
From Blogs to Bots: Exploring the Impact of Ai Co-Authorship on Attitude FormationPreprint
Cho, K., & Shin, S. Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5374607
Şengül, B. C., Türkyılmaz, C. A., YILDIRIM, Y. O., & Pirtini, S. (2025) · R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal · doi:10.33723/rs.1708096
(2025) · Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume I · doi:10.36315/2025v2end097
Supporting AI Learning with AI-Embodied Educational Robotics
Eguchi, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98762-5_18
From AI to Performance: Understanding the Mediating Role of AI Usage in Startup Success
Qasim, D., Qasim, W., & Khalifeh, A. (2025) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90271-0_37
Tutan, N. S., & Şanlıer, N. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Studies in Health Science and Obesity · doi:10.51271/jashso.34
Brain in a Jar: Demystifying AI for Elementary Schoolers
Nejašmić, D., Mladenović, M., Mladenović, S., & Granić, A. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02801-3_1
Bhimavarapu, U. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0598-1.ch011
Huang, L., Wu, T. Y., Tsai, T., & Cheung, W. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1442
Bi, C., Zhang, D., Sun, Z., & Yan, J. (2025) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-03-2025-0124
Yu, Z., Zhao, K., & Yu, H. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17229993
Digital Transformation in Education
Yalçın, M. T., & Çoban, Ö. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6375-2.ch009
Deng, N., Hu, Y., & Jiang, X. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5766511
Sam, A. M., Reszka, S. S., Dunn, C. M., Franco-Jenkins, X., Tomaszewski, B. R., Leggett, T., Waters, V., & Odom, S. L. (2025) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2025.2598592
Villeneuve, A., & Dessureault, J.-S. (2025) · Enjeux et société Approches transdisciplinaires · doi:10.7202/1122024ar
Yavuz, C., & Tavıl, Z. M. (2025) · Language Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.35207/later.1693019
Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., Truong, T. M., Ho-Mai, N. T., Luu, T. T., & Li, Z. (2025) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104846
Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması
Gökoğlu, S., Erdoğdu, F., & Altun, E. (2025) · Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International · doi:10.18039/ajesi.1699897
Kılık, B., & Hıdıroğlu, Y. Ö. (2025) · Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi · doi:10.17522/balikesirnef.1737266
Ersoy, M., & Yildiz, A. (2025) · e-International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.19160/e-ijer.1812597
Development and Validation of an AI Literacy Diagnostic Tool for Middle School Students
Chung, K., Kim, S., Lee, J., Lee, C., Noh, H., Kwon, Y., & Kim, H. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2595309
Kızıltoprak, A. A. T. (2025) · Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18506/anemon.1802689
Costa, C. J. D. C. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10728-2_8
Kocakoyun, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9048-0_36
Reclaiming Control: Empowering Learner Agency in Generative AI Literacy
Lee, M., & Tan, R. J. Y. (2025) · Bridging human and machine: future education with intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-0950-8_6
Fidan, Ü., Gündüz, C., & Erbey, A. (2025) · Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.32329/uad.1743237
Improving Software Project Development Performance Using AI Tools
Fawareh, H. J., & Dabaa’t, S. A. (2026) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95310-1_168
AI-Driven Instruction and Its Influence on EFL Learners' Self-efficacy, Self-regulation, and GritPreprint
Li, L., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8282837/v1
Bae, H., Park, J., Zhao, Y., & Walton, D. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0756-5.ch003
Wallace, J. J., Perino, J., & Katzarska-Miller, I. I. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3000-6.ch004 · Cited by 1
Building Future-Ready Capabilities: How AI Reshapes Enterprise Talent Development
Li, A.-T., Yu, P., Chiang, J.-W., & Chang, Y.-C. (2026) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-025-04642-6 · Cited by 1
Wang, S., Yan, R., & Hu, W. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2026.2613807
Elçiçek, M., & Pesen, A. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2619619
Yapay Zekâ ve Sürdürülebilir İş Modelleri Üzerine Sistematik Bir Derleme
Şahin, E. (2026) · İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.17336/igusbd.1690119
Latent Profiles of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence
Demirdiş, B. (2026) · Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education · doi:10.14686/buefad.1710784 · Cited by 1
Qian, Q. (2025) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1109/jcdl67857.2025.00051
Kjeksrud, S., Engdal, S. A., Hokstad, L. M., Grassini, S., & Lindqvist, P. H. F. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies · doi:10.31374/sjms.414 · Cited by 3
Zhang, X., Tian, X., & Chen, X. (2026) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-05-2025-0270 · Cited by 1
Chen, Y., Majid, M. Z. A., & bin Arham, A. F. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8606047/v1
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Biology Education
Acarlı, D. S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9220-2.ch011
Mierzecka, A., Deja, M., Kisilowska-Szurmińska, M., & Brylska, K. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17272-3_2
Karakılıç, G. D., Balbaloğlu, Ö., & Göçer, Ş. (2026) · Reumatología Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2026.502098
AI Literacy: Frequent Use with Little Training
Kneubühler, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_359-1
Wu, B. (2025) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1109/icetc66579.2025.11387331
Hu, Y., 刘, 丽., Yang, H., & Jia, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1763924
Li, B., & Lowell, V. L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51447-0_260-1
Teh, W. C., Lim, T. P., Ng, W. C., & Soong, Y. Q. (2026) · Human Systems Management · doi:10.1177/01672533261430175
Future Teachers' Perspectives on AI Integration in Mathematics Education
García, C. R., Serrano, A. D. L. H., & Niño, L. V. M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0101-1.ch010
Xu, S., Shen, F., & Xu, X. (2026) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101296 · Cited by 1
Pennanen, N., Welsch, R., & Christian Guckelsberger, B. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789101
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1324-1337
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W4280549083
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 549 · 2025: 323 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 27
- FWCI
- 120.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018AAA0101700)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- AI literacy, AI literacy scale, user competence, AI awareness, AI ethics, AI evaluation, digital literacy, artificial intelligence use, human-AI interaction, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
