Cited by 26Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCounseling Practices and Supervision

The Mentoring FAN: A promising approach to enhancing attunement within the mentoring system

Pryce, Julia M., Gilkerson, Linda, Barry, Johanna E.·2018·Journal of Social Service Research

Abstract

Youth mentoring is a popular tool in positive youth development, with most programs utilizing a model through which youth and non-parental adults are “matched.” Using an adaptation of the Facilitating Attuned Interactions framework, this study sought to explore the effectiveness of the Mentoring FAN in enhancing interpersonal attunement among mentoring staff at two youth mentoring programs in the U.S. Upon completion of the Mentoring FAN training, quantitative (n = 28) and qualitative (n = 15) data were collected from program staff at both sites. Open-ended data from a subset of mentors (n = 27) was also gathered. Results revealed that mentoring staff experienced significant increases in empathy following the Mentoring FAN intervention. Participant interviews revealed increased attunement, increased listening ability, and increased collaboration in the supervisory relationship. Findings support the continued delivery and rigorous testing of Mentoring FAN training, with great promise for enhancing attunement across the mentoring system as a means of strengthening the relationships so critical to this intervention. The study also has important implications for the development of mentor support practices within mentoring organizations, as well as policies designed to meet the needs of youth served by mentoring programs in the U.S.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01488376.2018.1472174

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emotional component also encompasses other qualities, such as listening, empathy, attunement, genuine respect, and sensitivity.

    “The emotional component also encompasses other qualities, such as listening, empathy, attunement [62,96,97,98], genuine respect [99], and sensitivity [39,94,100].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pryce, J. M., Gilkerson, L., & Barry, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Erikson Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Pryce, Julia M.
Venue
Journal of Social Service Research
Published
2018-05-27
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
350-364
ISSN
  • 0148-8376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7314
OpenAlex
W2806141409
Cited by
26
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Service Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
d
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
youth mentoring, empathy, listening skills, supervisory relationship, positive youth development, mentoring programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review