Cited by 272Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Assessment for learner self‐regulation: enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies

Nicol, David·2009·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

While there is considerable research on the first‐year experience, much less has been written about the impact of assessment and feedback practices on that experience. This paper explores how formative assessment and feedback might be used to enhance the first‐year experience and enable students to develop the skills needed for self‐regulated learning. It also explores how technology might support formative assessment practices in the current higher education context, where modularisation, larger student numbers and lower staff‐student ratios have all reduced opportunities for formative support. A framework is proposed for the design of large‐cohort first‐year courses based on two recent literature reviews. This provides a lens through which to analyse two first‐year courses (Psychology and French) that were redesigned with funding from the Re‐engineering Assessment Practices (REAP) project. Evaluations show that both course redesigns resulted in high levels of student satisfaction, in performance improvements in final exams when compared with previous years and in workload efficiency gains brought about by the application of technology. Ways of improving on these designs based on the proposed framework are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602930802255139

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students are always informally engaged in the self-regulation of learning when they participate in academic tasks.

    “Nicol recognizes that 'students are always informally engaged in the self-regulation of learning when they participate in academic tasks' (p.338)”

    From Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design (2013) · cites this paper as Nicol 2009

  • When students receive feedback from teachers they must engage in self-assessment if they are to use that information to improve academic performance.

    “'when students receive feedback from teachers they must engage in selfassessment if they are to use that information to improve academic performance: that is, they must decode the feedback message, internalise it and use it to make judgements about and modify their own work.' (p. 339).”

    From Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design (2013) · cites this paper as Nicol 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicol, D.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Nicol, David
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2009-04-29
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
335-352
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W2040545651
Cited by
272
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
46.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Scottish Funding Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
formative assessment, feedback, student self-regulation, first-year experience, educational technology, course redesign, large cohorts, academic performance, student satisfaction, higher education assessment practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review