The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students, feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they need to understand the meaning of the feedback statements. They also need to identify, with near certainty, the particular aspects of their work that need attention. For these to occur, students must possess critical background knowledge. This article sets out the nature of that knowledge and how students can acquire it. They must appropriate for themselves three fundamental concepts – task compliance, quality and criteria – and also develop a cache of relevant tacit knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, he proposed that student capability in ' complex appraisal ' was necessary for learning from feedback and that educators needed to do more to articulate the reasons for the information provided (i.e. quality notions) rather than providing information.”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This will help them develop appropriate evaluative judgement themselves in relation to criteria or standards and make more sense of and take greater control of their own learning (Boud and Soler 2016; Sadler 2010).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We identified these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
In the citing paper
“Sadler suggests that for information to become feedback, it must enable the learner to take action to remedy the gap between actual and desired performance [37].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“It is not feasible here to summarise the findings from the four major reviews of feedback carried out by Natriello (1987), Crooks (1988), Black and Wiliam (1998), and Hattie and Timperley (2007), except to note that all dealt predominantly with school-level learning.”
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationThe psychology of meaningful verbal learning.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) · Cited by 2,568
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413937 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 999
Pérez, G. C., & Zúñiga, C. G. (2018) · Actualidades Investigativas en Educación · doi:10.15517/aie.v18i3.34327 · Cited by 48
Wiltbank, L. B., Williams, K. R., Salter, R. L., Marciniak, L., Sederstrom, E., McConnell, M., Offerdahl, E. G., Boyer, J., & Momsen, J. L. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1516731 · Cited by 25
Acts of responding. Teachers’ written comments and students’ text revisions
Otnes, H., & Solheim, R. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1595524 · Cited by 19
Prácticas y concepciones de retroalimentación en Formación Inicial Docente
Pérez, G. C., & Zúñiga, C. G. (2019) · Educação e Pesquisa · doi:10.1590/s1678-4634201945192953 · Cited by 41
Repositioning peer marking for feedback literacy in higher education
Fernández-Toro, M., & Duensing, A. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1863911 · Cited by 17
Pérez‐Guillén, S., Carrasco‐Uribarren, A., Celis, C. L.-D., González-Rueda, V., Rodríguez-Rubio, P. R., & Cabanillas‐Barea, S. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03651-w · Cited by 18
Castañeda, L., & Villar-Onrubia, D. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/12599 · Cited by 32
Rodríguez Rincón, Y., Munárriz, A., & Magreñán Ruiz, A. (2024) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101072 · Cited by 29
Backwards Assessment Explanations: Implications for Teaching and Assessment Practice
Sadler, D. R. (2014) · Landscapes: the arts, aesthetics, and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10274-0_2 · Cited by 18
Self-citationStewart, J., Shanmugam, S., & Seenan, C. (2016) · European Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1080/21679169.2016.1181205 · Cited by 20
Functions of Assessment in Teacher Education
Smith, K. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0369-1_12 · Cited by 18
Addressing the wicked problem of feedback during the teaching practicum
Nel, C., & Marais, E. (2021) · Perspectives in Education · doi:10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i1.25 · Cited by 18
Majós, T. M., Ginesta, A., & Rochera, M. J. (2014) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.961503 · Cited by 18
Providing Exemplars in the Learning Environment: the Case for and against
Newlyn, D. (2013) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2013.010104 · Cited by 18
Watson, M., & Barton, G. M. (2020) · Journal of International Students · doi:10.32674/jis.v10is2.2849 · Cited by 19
Lipsch-Wijnen, I., & Dirkx, K. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2082089 · Cited by 22
Learning echocardiography- what are the challenges and what may favour learning? A qualitative study
Dieden, A., Carlson, E., & Gudmundsson, P. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1656-1 · Cited by 18
Expert teacher perceptions of two-way feedback interaction
Tan, F., Whipp, P. R., Gagné, M., & Quaquebeke, N. V. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102930 · Cited by 26
Trevitt, C., Stocks, C., & Quinlan, K. M. (2011) · The International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/1360144x.2011.589004 · Cited by 17
Kim, J. (2015) · Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) · Cited by 17
Developing a national understanding of assessment and feedback in Irish higher education
O'Neill, G. M., McEvoy, E., & Maguire, T. (2020) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2020.1730220 · Cited by 17
Alternative Assessments in Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic: The Strenghths and Weaknesses
Arifuddin, A., Turmudi, T., & Rokhmah, U. N. (2021) · International Journal of Elementary Education · doi:10.23887/ijee.v5i2.33532 · Cited by 17
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches
Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2006140 · Cited by 17
Feedback in Postgraduate Online Learning: Perspectives and Practices
Hounsell, D. (2021) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77673-2_3 · Cited by 18
Making Use of Data for Assessments: Harnessing Analytics and Data Science
Ifenthaler, D., Greiff, S., & Gibson, D. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_41 · Cited by 17
Colthorpe, K. L., Chen, X., & Zimbardi, K. (2014) · Journal of Learning Design · doi:10.5204/jld.v7i2.198 · Cited by 17
Like a bell responding to a striker: Instruction contingent on assessment
Huang, S.-C. (2012) · English Teaching Practice & Critique · Cited by 17
Supporting peer assessment in education with conversational agents
Lee, Y., & Fu, W. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3308557.3308695 · Cited by 17
La evaluación del aprendizaje en la universidad según la experiencia de los estudiantes
Gil-Flores, J. (2012) · Estudios sobre Educación · doi:10.15581/004.22.2076 · Cited by 17
The impact of pedagogies of partnership on the student learning experience in UK higher education
Pauli, R., Raymond‐Barker, B., & Worrell, M. (2016) · UWL Repository (University of West London) · Cited by 17
Brummer, L., de Boer, H., Mouw, J. M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2024) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-024-09501-4 · Cited by 25
MCGUIRE, M. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2548590 · Cited by 34
Jiménez, E. G., Noche, M. B. G., & Gómez-Ruíz, M. Á. (2014) · Innovation, technology and knowledge management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_9 · Cited by 19
Comparing student self-assessment to individualized instructor feedback
Gibbs, J. C., & Taylor, J. D. (2016) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787416637466 · Cited by 16
Iterated assessment and feedback improves student outcomes
Morrell, L. J. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1643301 · Cited by 16
Khosravi, H., Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Lodge, J. M. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375532 · Cited by 16
Qualitative approaches to researching evaluative judgement in pedagogical activities: a case study
Gladovic, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1901854 · Cited by 17
Student Learning Approaches: Beyond Assessment Type to Feedback and Student Choice
Clack, A., & Dommett, E. J. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11090468 · Cited by 19
Enhancing the development and understanding of assessment literacy in higher education
Zhu, X., & Evans, C. (2022) · European Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/21568235.2022.2118149 · Cited by 16
Setting Writing Revision Goals After AssessmentforLearning
Huang, S.-C. (2015) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434303.2015.1092544 · Cited by 16
Connecting feedback, classroom research and Didaktik perspectives
Svanes, I. K., & Skagen, K. (2017) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1140810 · Cited by 14
Ashby, S., Snodgrass, S. H., Rivett, D. A., & Russell, T. G. (2016) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.12279 · Cited by 16
Nixon, S., Brooman, S., Murphy, B., & Fearon, D. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1195333 · Cited by 16
Moving Beyond a Sign of Judgment: Primary School Teachers’ Perception and Practice of Feedback
Dessie, A. A., & Sewagegn, A. A. (2019) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2019.1224a · Cited by 16
What Does Reflection Look and Feel Like for International Students?
Barton, G. M., & Ryan, M. E. (2020) · Journal of International Students · doi:10.32674/jis.v10is2.2848 · Cited by 16
Concentrating on affective feedforward in online tutoring
Chen, Y., Chou, Y., & Cowan, J. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12077 · Cited by 16
(Re)viewing assessment: changing lenses to refocus on learning
James, M. (2017) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2017.1318823 · Cited by 22
Zhan, Y. (2022) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2022.2093965 · Cited by 17
Hatala, M., Nazeri, S., & Kia, F. S. (2022) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100881 · Cited by 15
Capturing student feedback literacy using reflective logs
Coppens, K., den Broeck, L. V., Winstone, N., & Langie, G. (2023) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2023.2185501 · Cited by 19
The feedback I want versus the feedback I need: Investigating students' perceptions of feedback
Boekel, M. V., Hufnagle, A. S., Weisen, S., & Troy, A. (2023) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22928 · Cited by 15
Say, R., Visentin, D. C., Saunders, A., Atherton, I., Carr, A. R., & King, C. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12868 · Cited by 15
Starfield, S., Paltridge, B., McMurtrie, R. J., Holbrook, A., Lovat, T., Kiley, M., & Fairbairn, H. (2017) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.008 · Cited by 15
Peer assessment: the role of relational learning through communities of practice
Merry, S. P., & Orsmond, P. (2018) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1544236 · Cited by 18
A conceptual framework for Assessment-Informed Differentiation (AID) in the classroom
Eysink, T., & Schildkamp, K. (2021) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2021.1942118 · Cited by 18
Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research in Evaluative Judgment
Khosravi, H., Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., Lodge, J. M., & Abdi, S. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.7206 · Cited by 16
Taylor, L. A., Oostdam, R., & Fukkink, R. G. (2022) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103780 · Cited by 15
Effects of peer-editing on L2 writing achievement among secondary school students in Ethiopia
Sahle, S., Siawk, Y. A., & Gebremariam, H. T. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2211467 · Cited by 15
Tosati, S., Lawthong, N., & Suwanmonkha, S. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.422 · Cited by 15
Perspectivas internacionales sobre la práctica de la evaluación en Educación Superior
Brown, S. A. (2015) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.7203/relieve.21.1.6403 · Cited by 15
Delany, C. M., Doughney, L., Bandler, L. G., Harms, L., Andrews, S., Nicholson, P., Remedios, L. J., Edmondson, W., Kosta, L., & Ewen, S. C. (2017) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0137-x · Cited by 19
Kayima, F., & Mkimbili, S. T. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09876-y · Cited by 14
Cookson, C. J. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1420138 · Cited by 15
Exploring the emotions of international students about their feedback experiences
Olave-Encina, K., Moni, K., & Renshaw, P. D. (2020) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1786020 · Cited by 14
Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality
Arts, J., Jaspers, M., & Brinke, D. J.-T. (2021) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2021.1901641 · Cited by 14
Principles of Good Assessment Practice in Coach Education: An Initial Proposal
McCarthy, L., Vangrunderbeek, H., & Piggott, D. (2021) · International Sport Coaching Journal · doi:10.1123/iscj.2021-0009 · Cited by 16
Why and how educators use exemplars
Hawe, E. M., Dixon, H. R., & Hamilton, R. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.3.10 · Cited by 14
Interventions in teaching first-year law: feeding forward to improve learning outcomes
Walker, S., & Hobson, J. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.832728 · Cited by 14
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.001 · Cited by 14
Assessment as, for, and of Twenty-First Century Learning Using Information Technology: An Overview
Webb, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_37 · Cited by 14
Sustainable Development in Third Level Programs: Distilling a Pathway to a True Net-Zero Education
Kez, D. A., Lowans, C., & Foley, A. M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16051998 · Cited by 13
Student Engagement with Feedback
Scott, J., Shields, C., Gardner, J., Hancock, A., & Nutt, A. (2011) · Bioscience Education · doi:10.3108/beej.18.5se · Cited by 13
Ilangakoon, C., Ajjawi, R., Endacott, R., & Rees, C. E. (2021) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103255 · Cited by 16
O que é avaliar? Reconstrução de práticas e conceções de avaliação
Roldão, M. D. C., & Ferro, N. (2015) · Estudos em Avaliação Educacional · doi:10.18222/eae.v26i63.3671 · Cited by 13
Macleod, G., Lent, N., Tian, X., Liang, Y., Moore, M., & Sen, S. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1719976 · Cited by 16
Online Peer Review of Oral Presentations
Ho, E. (2020) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220969280 · Cited by 13
A review of contemporary trends in Higher Education assessment
Brown, S. A. (2015) · tic revista d innovació educativa · doi:10.7203/attic.14.4166 · Cited by 13
Issues and agency: postgraduate student and tutor experiences with written feedback
Sánchez, H. S., & Dunworth, K. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.921885 · Cited by 13
Peer review of laboratory reports for engineering students
Andersson, M., & Weurlander, M. (2018) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2018.1538322 · Cited by 13
Effects of rubric quality on marker variation in higher education
Chakraborty, S., Dann, C. E., Mandal, A., Dann, B., Paul, M., & Hafeez‐Baig, A. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100997 · Cited by 12
Henderson, B., Aitken, R., Lewis, L. K., & Chipchase, L. S. (2021) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104881 · Cited by 12
Promoting potential through purposeful inclusive assessment for distance learners
Gibson, P., Clarkson, R., & Scott, M. (2022) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2022.2143321 · Cited by 12
Evaluating student feedback literacies: a study using first-year business and economics students
Karunarathne, W., Selman, C. J., & Ryan, T. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2267803 · Cited by 12
Treschman, P., Stylianou, M., & Brooks, C. (2024) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x241230829 · Cited by 19
Twyford, E. J., & Dean, B. A. (2024) · Journal of Accounting Education · doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100931 · Cited by 12
Abubakar, A. M., & Adeshola, I. (2019) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8476-6.ch013 · Cited by 12
Zwart, D. P., Goei, S. L., Noroozi, O., & Luit, J. E. H. V. (2021) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1186/s41039-021-00147-x · Cited by 14
Feedback Provision in Mentoring Conversation - Differing Mentor and Student Perceptions
Korver, B., & Tillema, H. (2014) · Journal of Education and Training Studies · doi:10.11114/jets.v2i2.289 · Cited by 12
Meyer-Beining, J., Vigmo, S., & Mäkitalo, Å. (2018) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.05.004 · Cited by 12
Creating an agenda for developing students’ evaluative judgement
Boud, D. J., Dawson, P., Tai, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315109251-20 · Cited by 12
Bruna, C., Villarroel, V., Bruna, D., & Martínez, J. A. (2019) · Formación universitaria · doi:10.4067/s0718-50062019000200017 · Cited by 12
Pitt, E. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_8 · Cited by 12
Alfakhry, G., Mustafa, K., Ybrode, K., Jazayerli, B., Milly, H., ABOHAJAR, S. A., Hassan, H., Alhomsi, K., & Jamous, I. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04474-z · Cited by 10
Enhancing grammar proficiency of EFL learners through corpus-integrated lessons
Zhong, X., & Wakat, G. S. (2023) · Ampersand · doi:10.1016/j.amper.2023.100139 · Cited by 21
Hoomanfard, M. H. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100891 · Cited by 11
Mughari, S., Naveed, M. A., & Rafique, G. M. (2024) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-09-2023-0478 · Cited by 13
Using software to engage design students in academic writing
Aitken, A., & Thompson, D. G. (2017) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9413-4 · Cited by 11
Berg, S. A., & Moon, A. C. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00213a · Cited by 13
Muji, A. P., Ambiyar, A., Aziz, I., & Hidayat, H. (2021) · International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education · doi:10.24036/00478za0002 · Cited by 14
Percepciones de Estudiantes y Docentes: Evaluación Formativa en Proyectos de Aprendizaje Tutorados
Mínguez, L. M., Prados, L. M., Boza, C. N., & Ortíz, D. C. (2019) · Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.15366/10.15366/riee2019.12.1.004 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadler, D. Royce
- ORCID
- Sadler, D. Royce
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2116967411
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 162.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- feedback effectiveness, student ability, tacit knowledge, task compliance, quality standards, student self-assessment, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
