The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students, feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they need to understand the meaning of the feedback statements. They also need to identify, with near certainty, the particular aspects of their work that need attention. For these to occur, students must possess critical background knowledge. This article sets out the nature of that knowledge and how students can acquire it. They must appropriate for themselves three fundamental concepts – task compliance, quality and criteria – and also develop a cache of relevant tacit knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, he proposed that student capability in ' complex appraisal ' was necessary for learning from feedback and that educators needed to do more to articulate the reasons for the information provided (i.e. quality notions) rather than providing information.”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This will help them develop appropriate evaluative judgement themselves in relation to criteria or standards and make more sense of and take greater control of their own learning (Boud and Soler 2016; Sadler 2010).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We identified these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
In the citing paper
“Sadler suggests that for information to become feedback, it must enable the learner to take action to remedy the gap between actual and desired performance [37].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“It is not feasible here to summarise the findings from the four major reviews of feedback carried out by Natriello (1987), Crooks (1988), Black and Wiliam (1998), and Hattie and Timperley (2007), except to note that all dealt predominantly with school-level learning.”
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationThe psychology of meaningful verbal learning.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) · Cited by 2,568
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413937 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 999
Embedding equity: online tutor support to provide effective feedforward on assessments
Teakel, S. L., Linden, K. C., van der Ploeg, N., & Roman, N. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2232955 · Cited by 7
Contextualizing corrective feedback in scientific writing through online learning platforms
Saragih, E., Zein, T. T., & Sumbayak, D. M. (2023) · Studies in English Language and Education · doi:10.24815/siele.v10i3.25867 · Cited by 7
Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10346-0 · Cited by 9
Performance standards for teachers supporting nursing students' reflection skills development
Groen, A. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Education and Practice · doi:10.5430/jnep.v2n1p9 · Cited by 9
Open data framework for sustainable assessment in software forges
Traverso-Ribón, I., Ruiz‐Rube, I., Dodero, J. M., & Palomo‐Duarte, M. (2013) · International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics · doi:10.1145/2479787.2479817 · Cited by 7
Mínguez, L. M. (2016) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v0i29.42719 · Cited by 7
Assessment as, for, and of Twenty-First-Century Learning Using Information Technology: An Overview
Webb, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_37-1 · Cited by 7
Classroom Assessment Practices and Student Goal Orientations in Mathematics Classes
Yıldızlı, H. (2020) · Journal of Qualitative Research in Education · doi:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.13m · Cited by 9
Learning through feedback loop metaphors
Willis, J. (2014) · Curriculum Matters · doi:10.18296/cm.0175 · Cited by 7
Evaluation of a large group supervision model in a university student-led physiotherapy clinic
Moseley, J., Hellawell, M., Graham, C. S., & Briggs, A. (2022) · British Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.12968/bjhc.2021.0098 · Cited by 7
Grainger, P. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.4.4 · Cited by 7
ClasSense: A Mobile Digital Backchannel System for Monitoring Class Morale
Jiranantanagorn, P., Shen, H., Goodwin, R., & Teoh, K.-K. (2015) · International Journal of Learning and Teaching · doi:10.18178/ijlt.1.2.161-167 · Cited by 7
Alcalá, D. H., Fernández‐Río, J., Oliva, J. C., & Pueyo, Á. P. (2017) · Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.6018/reifop.20.3.268681 · Cited by 6
Cain, M., & Fanshawe, M. (2019) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-0426-0.ch001 · Cited by 7
Learner perceptions of the feedback process in the online component of a blended course
Moni, A. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i2.3967 · Cited by 9
Curtis, K., Chong, S. W., & Kong, M. S. (2025) · Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1080/29984475.2025.2495271 · Cited by 9
Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Gómez-Ruiz, M., Balderas, A., & Rodríguez-Gómez, G. (2025) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-025-09858-2 · Cited by 9
La retroalimentación formativa como estrategia para mejorar el desempeño en el aula
Moya-Muñoz, L. D., Lopez-Velez, C. R., Pérez-Marquin, J. M., & Cedeño-León, M. M. (2025) · Revista Científica Zambos. · doi:10.69484/rcz/v4/n2/118 · Cited by 6
Developing Creative Teaching Skills in Pre-Service Teachers
Simpson, R., Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2023) · International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity · doi:10.7202/1099950ar · Cited by 6
Adesanya, L. O., & Graham, M. A. (2023) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.15700/saje.v43n3a2245 · Cited by 6
Gan, Z., & Wang, X. (2024) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2023-0136 · Cited by 7
Why not rubrics in doctoral education?
Grainger, P., Carey, M. D., & Johnston, C. A. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2338924 · Cited by 7
Student Adoption of AI Writing Tools
Malmous, M., & Zaidoune, S. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7220-3.ch009 · Cited by 7
Feedback by Dutch Inspectors to Schools
Dobbelaer, M. J., Godfrey, D., & Franssen, H. M. B. (2017) · Accountability and educational improvement · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52536-5_5 · Cited by 6
A method called action(re)call. How and why we use it.
Ahlstrand, P. (2020) · Research in Drama Education The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance · doi:10.1080/13569783.2020.1779584 · Cited by 6
Strategies for Increasing Counseling Competencies Among Audiology Graduate Clinicians: A Viewpoint
Whicker, J. J. (2020) · American Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1044/2020_aja-20-00036 · Cited by 6
The Value of Feedback in Primary Schools: Students’ Perceptions of the Practice
Sewagegn, A. A., & Dessie, A. A. (2020) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.10.19 · Cited by 6
Nilsberth, M., & Sandlund, E. (2020) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2020.100899 · Cited by 6
Ipsative assessment: measuring personal improvement
Martínez-Arboleda, A. (2021) · doi:10.14705/rpnet.2021.50.1239 · Cited by 6
Ryan, A., & WILKINSON, T. J. (2021) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2075 · Cited by 6
Learning to be expert writers: feedback in secondary English
Finch, M., & Willis, J. (2021) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2021.1908226 · Cited by 6
Percepções de estudantes do ensino superior sobre o feedback docente e desempenho acadêmico
Silva, J. D. C. R., & Carvalho, C. (2021) · Revista Brasileira de Educação · doi:10.1590/s1413-24782021260081 · Cited by 7
Summativ vurdering i formativ drakt – elevperspektiv på tilbakemelding fra heldagsprøver i norsk
Bueie, A. A. (2015) · Acta Didactica Norge · doi:10.5617/adno.1300 · Cited by 10
Fostering Students' ‘Use My Own Device' Attitude
Ada, M. B. (2014) · International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing · doi:10.4018/ijtem.2014010102 · Cited by 6
The Significance of Assignment Feedback: From Consumption to Construction
Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2012) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/eps.2012.40 · Cited by 6
What is Feedback? Connecting Student Perceptions to Assessment Practices
Pears, A., Harland, J., Hamilton, M., & Hadgraft, R. G. (2013) · International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE) · doi:10.1109/latice.2013.36 · Cited by 6
MyFeedBack: An interactive mobile Web 2.0 system for formative assessment and feedback
Ada, M. B. (2013) · International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education · doi:10.1109/icelete.2013.6644355 · Cited by 6
Formative Assessment and Learning
Dessie, A. A., & Heeralal, P. J. H. (2016) · International Journal for Innovation Education and Research · doi:10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss10.599 · Cited by 6
Open data framework for sustainable assessment of project-based learning experiences
Traverso-Ribón, I., Balderas, A., Dodero, J. M., Ruiz‐Rube, I., & Palomo‐Duarte, M. (2016) · Data Technologies and Applications · doi:10.1108/prog-12-2015-0078 · Cited by 6
Pearson, J. (2017) · Critical Inquiry in Language Studies · doi:10.1080/15427587.2017.1279544 · Cited by 6
Toward a Taxonomy of Written Feedback Messages
Murray, J., Gasson, N. R., & Smith, J. K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.006 · Cited by 6
From a passive information consumer to a critically thinking learner
Peled, Y., Pundak, D., & Weiser-Biton, R. (2019) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2019.1699853 · Cited by 6
Delany, C. M., Kameniar, B., Lysk, J., & Vaughan, B. (2020) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-020-09958-x · Cited by 6
Using Technology to Enhance Assessment and Feedback
Albinson, P., Çetinkaya, D., & Orman, T. (2020) · International Conference on Educational and Information Technology · doi:10.1145/3383923.3383940 · Cited by 6
The Future of Self and Peer Assessment: Are Technology or People the Key?
Tai, J., & Adachi, C. (2020) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_15 · Cited by 6
Cookson, C. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1236184 · Cited by 8
Moloi, Q. M., & Kanjee, A. (2018) · Pythagoras · doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v39i1.393 · Cited by 6
The what, when & how factors: reflections on classroom assessment in the service of inquiry
Cowie, B., & Harrison, C. A. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1824088 · Cited by 6
Electronic Portfolios Enhanced with Learning Analytics at the Workplace
van der Schaaf, M. F. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49789-1_89-1 · Cited by 6
Learning from Assessment Events: The Role of Goal Knowledge
Sadler, D. R. (2014) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694549.003.0009 · Cited by 6
Self-citationTeacher professional development for assessment for learning
Wolterinck-Broekhuis, C. H. D. (2022) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036554664 · Cited by 7
Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.09013-8 · Cited by 6
Yilmaz, M., Temur, H. B., Emmungil, L., Çelik, E., Gauthier, A., & Cukurova, M. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00592-y · Cited by 10
“This shift represents a departure from labour-intensive practices, advocating for more sustainable methods that are responsive to learners’ evolving needs (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Sadler, 2010).”
ENHANCING STUDENT LEARNING BY NARROWING THE GAP BETWEEN FEEDBACK GIVING AND FEEDBACK RECEIVING
Goold, E. (2016) · IISES Teaching & Education Conference · doi:10.20472/tec.2016.003.010 · Cited by 5
Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education
McConlogue, T. (2020) · UCL Press eBooks · doi:10.14324/111.9781787353640 · Cited by 5
van der Eijk, M., Jacobs, U., & Tempelman, C. H. L. (2024) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2024.05.001 · Cited by 6
Can Artificial Intelligence help provide more sustainable feed-back?
Puertas, E., & Cano, E. (2024) · Digital Education Review · doi:10.1344/der.2024.45.50-58 · Cited by 5
A Comparison of Assessment Beliefs of Science and Education Lecturers in a University
Davies, M. S., & Taras, M. (2016) · Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.17583/remie.2016.1766 · Cited by 5
Using assessment strategically to gestate a student thesis: learning through community
Callie, C. (2016) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/27-5-287 · Cited by 5
Exemplifying Formative Assessment Practices in the Field Through Case Study
Dann, C. E., & Dann, B. (2017) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2630-8.ch003 · Cited by 5
Hees, V. V., & Schoonhoven, A. (2021) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7106-4.ch018 · Cited by 5
Concepciones del desarrollo de la tarea escolar, para un aprendizaje significativo
Masmuta, A. M. D., & Rosero, S. P. V. (2022) · Revista UNIMAR · doi:10.31948/rev.unimar/unimar40-1-art4 · Cited by 5
Knaut, J., Altieri, M., Bach, S., Strobl, I., & Dechant-Herrera, K. (2022) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v17i23.36425 · Cited by 5
Self-regulating writers’ uses and non-uses of peer feedback
Usher, N. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2179970 · Cited by 5
Mediated performance in the feedback process: reinforcing improvement
Yan, Z., & Hyland, K. (2023) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2023.2242395 · Cited by 5
Closeness and distance: Using close reading as a method of educational enquiry in English studies
Brookman, H., & Horn, J. (2016) · Arts and Humanities in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1474022216636517 · Cited by 5
Evaluación sostenible de experiencias de aprendizaje basado en proyectos
Traverso-Ribón, I., Balderas, A., Dodero, J. M., Ruiz‐Rube, I., & Palomo‐Duarte, M. (2016) · Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) · doi:10.14201/eks2016171943 · Cited by 5
Quiroz, E. M. L., Remesal, A., & Rochera, M. J. (2017) · Perspectiva educacional · doi:10.4151/07189729-vol.57-iss.1-art.597 · Cited by 5
Learning Outcomes-Oriented Feedback-Response Pedagogy in Computer System Course
Huang, L., Zhao, H. Q., Yang, K., Liu, Y., & Xiao, Z. Q. (2018) · International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) · doi:10.1109/iccse.2018.8468781 · Cited by 5
Pearson, J. (2021) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2020.1829496 · Cited by 6
Lenhart, C., & Bouwma-Gearhart, J. L. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11060291 · Cited by 5
Encouraging active participation in dialogic feedback through assessment as learning
Rodway, C. L. (2017) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 5
Yeo, M. A. (2021) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.30466/ijltr.2021.121078 · Cited by 6
A design experiment on technology‐based learning progress feedback in a graduate‐level online course
Kim, M. K. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.308 · Cited by 6
Barker, T., & Bennett, S. (2011) · University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) · Cited by 5
Electronic Portfolios Enhanced with Learning Analytics at the Workplace
van der Schaaf, M. F. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3_89 · Cited by 5
Jorre, T. J. D. S. (2020) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_19 · Cited by 5
Technology-Enhanced Assessment Feedback
Moscrop, C., & Beaumont, C. D. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_13 · Cited by 5
Sarwar, G. S. (2012) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-5790 · Cited by 5
Rubric co-construction in medical and allied health education: Students’ and teachers' perceptionsPreprint
Kilgour, A., Morton, J. K., Cloete, L. M., Dawson, S., & Northcote, M. T. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1984776/v1 · Cited by 5
Feedback and classroom practice
Gamlem, S. M., & Vattøy, K.-D. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.09019-9 · Cited by 6
Psychometric properties of the Feedback Literacy Behaviour Scale (FLBS) for Chinese students
Zhu, J., Yang, Y., & Yan, Z. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2025.2537390 · Cited by 4
How does peer assessment support students’ self-regulation? A case study in online education
Fernández-Ferrer, M., Lanzo, N. C., Maina, M. F., & Ortiz, L. G. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00565-7 · Cited by 8
Influencing factors of L2 writers’ engagement in an assessment as learning-focused context
Lu, W., & Shen, B. (2024) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0159 · Cited by 4
Pollard, P., & Subasinghe, D. W. D. (2024) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme-2024-0052 · Cited by 5
Consequences of Historical Exam Access vs Timely Exam Feedback on Knowledge Retention (CHEATER)
McCue, A., Persky, A. M., Donnell, C., & Fuller, K. A. (2025) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101361 · Cited by 4
Fine-Tuning GPT-3.5-Turbo for Automatic Feedback Generation
Mazzullo, E., Bulut, O., Walsh, C., Sitarenios, G., & MacIntosh, A. (2025) · ACM Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/3672608.3707735 · Cited by 4
Heriyawati, D. F., & Romadhon, M. G. E. (2025) · Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal · doi:10.54855/callej.252614 · Cited by 6
Reflection and Reflective Practice for International Students and Their Supervisors in Context
Barton, G. M., & Ryan, M. E. (2017) · Professional and practice-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60058-1_6 · Cited by 4
Feedbackpraktiken im Schreibcoaching: Texte besprechen in der Hochschullehre
Schwarze, C. (2020) · Coaching | Theorie & Praxis · doi:10.1365/s40896-020-00045-x · Cited by 5
Using digital technology as formative assessments to enhance self-directed learning
Bunt, B. J., & TONDER, D. V. (2021) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2021.bk280.09 · Cited by 4
Sánchez‐Santillán, M., Fernandez‐Medina, C., Pérez, J. R. P., & Ruiz, M. P. P. (2023) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22640 · Cited by 4
Developing university students' feedback literacy through peer feedback activities
Laici, C., & Pentucci, M. (2023) · EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY · doi:10.3280/ess1-2023oa15925 · Cited by 4
Millar, B. C., Purkis, H., Moore, J. E., McClean, S., & Lowery, C. J. (2023) · British Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.3389/bjbs.2023.11891 · Cited by 5
Student teachers’ reactions to formative teacher and peer feedback
Bader, M., Iversen, S. H., & Borg, S. (2024) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2024.2385717 · Cited by 8
Harnessing the potential of exemplars to facilitate learning: insights from translation training
Li, X., & Ke, P. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2419610 · Cited by 4
An Exploration of Tutor Feedback on Essays and the Development of a Feedback Guide
Wilson, A. (2015) · European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning · Cited by 4
Balan, A. (2017) · The Law Teacher · doi:10.1080/03069400.2017.1332952 · Cited by 4
Engaging Students with Positive Learning Experiences Through Assessment and Feedback
Sambell, K., Brown, S. A., & Graham, L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54552-3_5 · Cited by 4
Individuell «automagisk» tilbakemelding på skriftlig eksamen
Mirmotahari, O., & Berg, Y. (2017) · Nordic Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.5324/njsteme.v1i1.2327 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadler, D. Royce
- ORCID
- Sadler, D. Royce
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2116967411
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 162.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- feedback effectiveness, student ability, tacit knowledge, task compliance, quality standards, student self-assessment, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
