The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students, feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they need to understand the meaning of the feedback statements. They also need to identify, with near certainty, the particular aspects of their work that need attention. For these to occur, students must possess critical background knowledge. This article sets out the nature of that knowledge and how students can acquire it. They must appropriate for themselves three fundamental concepts – task compliance, quality and criteria – and also develop a cache of relevant tacit knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, he proposed that student capability in ' complex appraisal ' was necessary for learning from feedback and that educators needed to do more to articulate the reasons for the information provided (i.e. quality notions) rather than providing information.”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This will help them develop appropriate evaluative judgement themselves in relation to criteria or standards and make more sense of and take greater control of their own learning (Boud and Soler 2016; Sadler 2010).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We identified these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
In the citing paper
“Sadler suggests that for information to become feedback, it must enable the learner to take action to remedy the gap between actual and desired performance [37].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“It is not feasible here to summarise the findings from the four major reviews of feedback carried out by Natriello (1987), Crooks (1988), Black and Wiliam (1998), and Hattie and Timperley (2007), except to note that all dealt predominantly with school-level learning.”
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationThe psychology of meaningful verbal learning.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) · Cited by 2,568
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413937 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Decolonising Formative Assessment
Crossouard, B. M., & Oprandi, P. (2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2056-375220220000008010 · Cited by 12
The Four Pillars of Peer Assessment for Collaborative Teamwork in Higher Education
Sridharan, B., McKay, J., & Boud, D. J. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_1 · Cited by 15
Waters, S. E., & Anderson-Lain, K. (2014) · Journal of higher education outreach & engagement/Journal of higher education outreach and engagement. · Cited by 11
Teachers' Questions and Responses during Teacher-Student Feedback Dialogues
Dekker-Groen, A., van der Schaaf, M. F., & Stokking, K. M. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2014.937359 · Cited by 14
Huang, S.-C. (2016) · Taiwan journal of TESOL · Cited by 11
The Importance of E-Portfolios for Effective Student-Facing Learning Analytics
Ellis, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3803-7_3 · Cited by 11
Accounting students' experience of an improved strategy of feedback on assessment
Stegmann, N., & Malan, M. (2016) · Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences · doi:10.4102/jef.v9i3.70 · Cited by 12
Structured peer review using a custom assessment program for electrical engineering students
Mirmotahari, O., & Berg, Y. (2018) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon.2018.8363339 · Cited by 11
Dargusch, J., & Charteris, J. (2018) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2018v43.n10.2 · Cited by 11
Brunker, N., Spandagou, I., & Grice, C. (2019) · doi:10.14221/ajte.2019v44n9.6 · Cited by 11
Lim, W., & Lee, M. Y. (2019) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/5946 · Cited by 11
Hill, L., & Edwards, F. (2019) · Assessment Matters · doi:10.18296/am.0036 · Cited by 11
Modelo de retroalimentación para el aprendizaje: Una propuesta basada en la revisión de literatura*
Cáceres, S. Q., & Tapia, C. S. (2021) · Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa · Cited by 11
Taking a nuanced view of the role of teacher feedback in the elementary classroom
Singh, K., & Mueller, J. (2021) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2021.1933415 · Cited by 11
University Students: Advantages and disavantatges of formative assessment
Mínguez, L. M., Rapp, C. V., Rapp, C. V., Romero-Martín, R., & Romero-Martín, R. (2015) · tic revista d innovació educativa · doi:10.7203/attic.14.4217 · Cited by 16
Healthcare Students’ Perceptions of Electronic Feedback through GradeMark®
Watkins, D. S., Dummer, P. M. H., Hawthorne, K., Cousins, J., Emmett, C. P., & Johnson, M. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/1945 · Cited by 11
Using feedback and ePortfolios to support professionalcompetence in healthcare learners
Peacock, S., Scott, A., Murray, S., & Morss, K. (2012) · Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) · Cited by 11
“We learn from each other”: peer review writing practices in English for academic purposes
Kostopoulou, S., & O’Dwyer, F. (2021) · Language Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1515/cercles-2021-2006 · Cited by 10
Never mind the gap: Formative assessment confronted with Dewey's and Gadamer's concept of experience
Egelandsdal, K., & Riese, H. (2020) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12378 · Cited by 10
Gebremariam, H. T. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241274331 · Cited by 18
Children’s Responses to Divergent and Convergent Design Feedback
Schut, A., Klapwijk, R., Gielen, M. A., & de Vries, M. J. (2023) · Journal of design and technology education/Design and technology education · doi:10.24377/dteij.article1311 · Cited by 10
Student-Centric Learning: A Transformation in the Learning Culture
Rajaram, K. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6804-0_5 · Cited by 10
Peer feedback as a strategy to foster feedback literacy in first-year allied health students
Tripodi, N., Vaughan, B., & Wospil, R. (2021) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.15694/mep.2021.000115.1 · Cited by 10
Learning from patients' written feedback: medical students' experiences
Björklund, K. L., Stenfors, T., Nilsson, G. H., & Leanderson, C. (2022) · International Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.5116/ijme.61d5.8706 · Cited by 10
Sánchez, G., González, M. T., & Bustamante, J. A. (2022) · Formación universitaria · doi:10.4067/s0718-50062022000300069 · Cited by 10
Feedback in the instrumental music lesson: A qualitative study
de Bruin, L. R. (2022) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/03057356221135668 · Cited by 18
Targeted, actionable and fair: Reviewer reports as feedback and its effect on ECR career choices
Derrick, G., Zimmermann, A., Greaves, H., Best, J., & Klavans, R. (2023) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvad034 · Cited by 21
Mínguez, L. M., & Aguilar, G. F. (2014) · Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.19083/ridu.8.371 · Cited by 10
Galyon, C. E., Voils, K., Blondin, C. A., & Williams, R. L. (2014) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9296-1 · Cited by 10
Quality and literature reviews: beyond reporting standards
Bearman, M. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12984 · Cited by 10
Sustainable Feedback: Students’ and Tutors’ Perceptions
Geitz, G., Brinke, D. J.-T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2277 · Cited by 11
Muñoz, L. F. M., Santos-Pastor, M., & Oliva, F. J. C. (2017) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v0i32.52918 · Cited by 26
The standards for academics’ standards-based assessment practices
Alonzo, D., Mirriahi, N., & Davison, C. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1521373 · Cited by 11
Formative peer assessment in healthcare education programmes: protocol for a scoping review
Stenberg, M., Mangrio, E., Bengtsson, M., & Carlson, E. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025055 · Cited by 11
Peng, M. Y., Zhang, Z., & Ho, S. S.-H. (2019) · Educational Sciences Theory & Practice · doi:10.12738/estp.2019.2.002 · Cited by 10
Learners’ Feedback Literacy and the Longer Term: Developing Capacity for Impact
Carless, D. R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_4 · Cited by 12
Rasyidah, U., Triana, N., & Saukah, A. (2020) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4329 · Cited by 10
Roles, relationships and emotions: Student teachers’ understanding of feedback as interpersonal
Elbra-Ramsay, C. (2021) · Research in Education · doi:10.1177/0034523721989370 · Cited by 10
LOS BENEFICIOS DE UNA CORRECTA EVALUACIÓN FORMATIVA EN EL AUTOAPRENDIZAJE DE LOS ALUMNOS
Amorín, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Supranational Policies of Education (JOSPOE) · doi:10.15366/jospoe2020.12.001 · Cited by 10
Towards effective feedback in higher education: bridging theory and practice
Geyskens, J., Donche, V., & Petegem, P. V. (2012) · Reflecting education · Cited by 10
Going beyond ‘received and understood’ as a way of conceptualising feedback
Ajjawi, R. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04347.x · Cited by 10
Leger, L. A., Kenjegalieva, K. A., Katsiampa, P., Liu, S., & Sirichand, K. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1109054 · Cited by 10
Thinking Critically in Undergraduate Biology: Flipping the Classroom and Problem-Based Learning
Addy, T. M., LePrevost, C. E., & Stevenson, M. (2014) · Double Helix A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing · doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2014.2.1.09 · Cited by 13
Student Utilisation of Feedback: A Cyclical Model
Pitt, E. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_10 · Cited by 10
Wragg, N., Barnes, C., Haig, A. J., Wright, E., Finley, G., & Magee, M. (2023) · Journal of Design Business & Society · doi:10.1386/dbs_00046_1 · Cited by 9
Mentzer, N., Lee, W., Jackson, A., & Bartholomew, S. R. (2023) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-023-09853-7 · Cited by 13
Durak, H. Y. (2024) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-024-09748-z · Cited by 9
Formative assessment in the translation classroom: Closing a feedback loop
Nikolaeva, S., & Korol, T. (2021) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21274 · Cited by 9
Hamond, L. F., Himonides, E., & Welch, G. F. (2021) · Orfeu · doi:10.5965/2525530406012021e0011 · Cited by 9
Teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards feedback: Contradictions and development trends
Азбель, А. А., Ilyushin, L. S., Kazakova, E. I., & Morozova, P. (2022) · The Education and science journal · doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2022-7-76-109 · Cited by 11
Supporting students to generate self-feedback: Critical reflections on the special issue
der Kleij, F. M. V. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101348 · Cited by 9
Bibliometric analysis of assessment and evaluation in higher education: 2012–2023
Sun, W., Ding, Y., Wang, R., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, B. L., & Liu, Q. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2351602 · Cited by 9
Clarke, R., & Thomas, S. (2012) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v2n3p30 · Cited by 9
Santos, L., & Cai, J. (2016) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_5 · Cited by 9
Automated Content Analysis: A Case Study of Computer Science Student Summaries
Gao, Y., Davies, P., & Passonneau, R. J. (2018) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-0531 · Cited by 9
Analysing the object of learning, using phenomenography
Ahlstrand, P. (2018) · International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies · doi:10.1108/ijlls-12-2016-0053 · Cited by 9
Laso, J. D. L. T. (2019) · Revista Educación · doi:10.15517/revedu.v43i1.30062 · Cited by 9
Does the use of annotated exemplars by nursing students predict academic performance? A cohort study
Carter, R., Halcomb, E., Ramjan, L. M., Wilson, N. J., Glew, P. J., & Salamonson, Y. (2019) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.06.003 · Cited by 9
Linking Assessment and Learning Analytics to Support Learning Processes in Higher Education
Schumacher, C. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_166-1 · Cited by 9
Exploring Coping Strategies of Transfer Students Joining Universities From Colleges
Foster, M., Mulroy, T. J., & Carver, M. (2020) · Student Success · doi:10.5204/ssj.v11i2.1617 · Cited by 9
Mountain, K., Teviotdale, W. W., Duxbury, J., & Oldroyd, J. (2022) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2022.2030240 · Cited by 13
Sandal, A. K., Helleve, I., Smith, K., & Gamlem, S. M. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2101236 · Cited by 10
Akbay, T., Sevim-Cirak, N., & Erol, O. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2228526 · Cited by 11
Assessment Tasks: Center of the Learning Process
Martínez, M. M., García, B. A., Cadenato, A., & Gallego, I. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.174 · Cited by 9
Sellbjer, S. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1310801 · Cited by 9
Critical Thinking through a Reflexive Platform
Montebello, M., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Tzirides, A. O., Haniya, S., Amina, T., Searsmith, D., Zhao, N., & Chen, M. (2018) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet.2018.8424778 · Cited by 9
Assessment feedback in examiner reports on master’s dissertations in translation studies
Man, D., Xu, Y., Chau, M. H., O’Toole, J. M., & Shunmugam, K. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100823 · Cited by 9
Assessment Literacy: Definition, Implementation, and Implications
Rhind, S. M., & Paterson, J. (2014) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme.0714-067r1 · Cited by 9
Playfoot, D. R., Horry, R., & Pink, A. E. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2373799 · Cited by 8
Li, X., & Ke, P. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2044013 · Cited by 9
Zwart, D. P., Goei, S. L., Luit, J. E. H. V., & Noroozi, O. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2071946 · Cited by 10
Razali, R., & Arifin, M. A. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2222655 · Cited by 8
Gao, X., & Brown, G. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111090 · Cited by 18
Mansour, H. F. (2015) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2015.05.004 · Cited by 8
Assessment in Higher Education: A CHAT Perspective
Havnes, A. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139035699.006 · Cited by 7
Evolving roles of faculty at an emerging hybrid competency‐based transdisciplinary program
Ashby, I., Caskurlu, S., & Exter, M. (2018) · The Journal of Competency-Based Education · doi:10.1002/cbe2.1059 · Cited by 8
Assessment Feedback in Primary Schools in Singapore and Beyond
Tan, K. H. K., & Wong, H. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.008 · Cited by 8
Gándara, A. H., & Ortíz, D. C. (2020) · Sportis Scientific Journal of School Sport Physical Education and Psychomotricity · doi:10.17979/sportis.2020.6.2.6041 · Cited by 8
The curiosity of educators from two cultural groups: Implications to professional development
Birenbaum, M., & Alhija, F. N.-A. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103150 · Cited by 8
Overconfidence and its link with feedback
Erat, S., Demirkol, K., & SALLABAŞ, M. E. (2020) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787420981731 · Cited by 8
Electronic Feedback: Pedagogical Considerations for the Implementation of Software
García-Yeste, M. (2013) · The EuroCALL Review · doi:10.4995/eurocall.2013.9789 · Cited by 8
Vattøy, K.-D., Gamlem, S. M., Kobberstad, L. R., & Rogne, W. M. (2022) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.1080/20004508.2022.2122202 · Cited by 8
Padlet as a Formative Assessment Tool in the Online Language Classroom: Action Research
Albarqi, G. (2023) · New language learning and teaching environments · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18950-0_11 · Cited by 8
Academics’ perception of final examinations in engineering education
Gratchev, I., Howell, S., & Stegen, S. (2023) · Australasian journal of engineering education · doi:10.1080/22054952.2023.2284484 · Cited by 10
Designing feedback activities to help low-performing students
Bjælde, O. E., Boud, D. J., & Lindberg, A. B. (2023) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874231212820 · Cited by 12
Laughton, D. J. (2013) · Student Engagement and Experience Journal · doi:10.7190/seej.v2i2.68 · Cited by 8
Mitton‐Kükner, J., Munroe, E., & Graham, D. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.47678/cjhe.v45i4.184403 · Cited by 8
The impact of assessment tasks on subsequent examination performance
Gaal, F. V., & Ridder, A. D. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787413498039 · Cited by 8
Nagori, R., & Cooper, M. (2014) · IAFOR Journal of Education · doi:10.22492/ije.2.2.07 · Cited by 8
Retracted on September 22, 2021 : TA Marking Parties: Worth the Price of Pizza?
Harrington, B., Ahmadzadeh, M., Cheng, N., Wang, E. H., & Efimov, V. (2018) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/3230977.3230997 · Cited by 8
RetractedSocial Support, Student Outcomes and Teaching Strategies
Lam, B. H. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3577-8_4 · Cited by 10
Developing a signature pedagogy for doctoral education
Smith, K. (2022) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12520 · Cited by 9
A cross-country study of service productivity
Sekhon, H. S., Yalley, A. A., Roy, S. K., & Shergill, G. S. (2016) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2016.1165671 · Cited by 8
Wyeld, T., Jiranantanagorn, P., Shen, H., Liao, K., & Bednarz, T. P. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102524 · Cited by 9
Student engagement and the role of feedback in learning
Wilson, A. (2012) · University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) · Cited by 8
Northcote, M. T., Williams, A. P., Fitzsimmons, P., & Kilgour, P. W. (2014) · Cited by 8
Pastor, V. M. L., Pueyo, Á. P., Barba, J. J., & Catalán, E. L. (2016) · Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) · doi:10.12800/ccd.v11i31.641 · Cited by 7
Exploring students’ receptivity to feedback: A latent profile analysis
Bahr, J. L., Höft, L., Lipnevich, A. A., Meyer, J., & Jansen, T. (2025) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2025.2467676 · Cited by 8
Feedback as an epistemic practice
Nieminen, J. H., Walton, J., & Cobb, P. J. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2624483 · Cited by 7
Examining evaluative language used in assessment feedback on business students’ academic writing
Shrestha, P. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100664 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadler, D. Royce
- ORCID
- Sadler, D. Royce
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2116967411
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 162.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- feedback effectiveness, student ability, tacit knowledge, task compliance, quality standards, student self-assessment, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
