The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students, feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they need to understand the meaning of the feedback statements. They also need to identify, with near certainty, the particular aspects of their work that need attention. For these to occur, students must possess critical background knowledge. This article sets out the nature of that knowledge and how students can acquire it. They must appropriate for themselves three fundamental concepts – task compliance, quality and criteria – and also develop a cache of relevant tacit knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, he proposed that student capability in ' complex appraisal ' was necessary for learning from feedback and that educators needed to do more to articulate the reasons for the information provided (i.e. quality notions) rather than providing information.”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This will help them develop appropriate evaluative judgement themselves in relation to criteria or standards and make more sense of and take greater control of their own learning (Boud and Soler 2016; Sadler 2010).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We identified these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
In the citing paper
“Sadler suggests that for information to become feedback, it must enable the learner to take action to remedy the gap between actual and desired performance [37].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“It is not feasible here to summarise the findings from the four major reviews of feedback carried out by Natriello (1987), Crooks (1988), Black and Wiliam (1998), and Hattie and Timperley (2007), except to note that all dealt predominantly with school-level learning.”
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationThe psychology of meaningful verbal learning.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) · Cited by 2,568
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413937 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 999
Can dialogue help to improve feedback on examinations?
Blair, A., Wyburn-Powell, A., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.777404 · Cited by 37
The Westerveld framework for interprofessional feedback dialogues in health professions education
Tielemans, C., de Kleijn, R. A. M., van der Schaaf, M. F., van den Broek, S., & Westerveld, T. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1967285 · Cited by 37
Pourdana, N., & Tavassoli, K. (2022) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-022-00156-7 · Cited by 34
Quality assurance of assessment and moderation discourses involving sessional staff
Grainger, P., Adie, L. E., & Weir, K. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1030333 · Cited by 34
McKevitt, C. (2016) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.13.1.2 · Cited by 34
Brooks, C., Burton, R., der Kleij, F. M. V., Carroll, A., Olave-Encina, K., & Hattie, J. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100943 · Cited by 36
Holistic feedback approach with video and peer discussion under teacher supervision
Hunukumbure, A. D., Smith, S., & Das, S. K. (2017) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1017-x · Cited by 33
Hansen, G., & Ringdal, R. (2017) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.005 · Cited by 33
Enacting feedback utilization from a task‐specific perspective
Lam, R. (2016) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1187185 · Cited by 34
van Diggelen, M. R., Doulougeri, K., Puente, S. M. G., Bombaerts, G. J. T., Dirkx, K., & Kamp, R. J. A. (2019) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09549-x · Cited by 46
Engelsen, K. S., & Smith, K. (2014) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_6 · Cited by 35
Closing the feedback loop? Iterative feedback between tutor and student in coursework assessments
Barker, M., & Pinard, M. A. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.875985 · Cited by 31
A genre and move analysis of written feedback in higher education
Yelland, C. (2011) · Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics · doi:10.1177/0963947011413563 · Cited by 31
Students use of exemplars to support academic writing in higher education: An integrative review
Carter, R., Salamonson, Y., Ramjan, L. M., & Halcomb, E. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.038 · Cited by 35
Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners’ reports on doctoral theses
Starfield, S., Paltridge, B., McMurtrie, R. J., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S. F., Fairbairn, H., Kiley, M., & Lovat, T. (2015) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2015.06.004 · Cited by 30
Sarwar, G. S., & Trumpower, D. L. (2015) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9368-7 · Cited by 32
The Transformative Role of ePortfolios: Feedback in Healthcare Learning
Peacock, S., Murray, S., Scott, A., & Kelly, J. (2011) · Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) · Cited by 30
Writing portfolio assessment in practice: individual, institutional, and systemic issues
Lam, R. (2019) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2019.1696197 · Cited by 30
Theorising how teachers manage the use of exemplars: towards mediated learning from exemplars
Smyth, P., & Carless, D. R. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1781785 · Cited by 30
Schut, A., Mechelen, M. V., Klapwijk, R., Gielen, M. A., & de Vries, M. J. (2020) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09612-y · Cited by 30
Title: How do Preservice Teacher Education students Move From Novice to Expert Assessors?
Grainger, P., & Adie, L. E. (2014) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.9 · Cited by 34
SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING CURRICULUM: STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES OF UNIVERSITY LEARNING EXPERIENCES
Nasri, N. M., Halim, L., & Talib, M. A. A. (2020) · Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction · doi:10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.8 · Cited by 29
Rand, J. (2017) · Research in Education · doi:10.1177/0034523717697519 · Cited by 30
The effects of rubrics on evaluative judgement: a randomised controlled experiment
Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1887081 · Cited by 29
Building Better Schools with Evidence-based Policy
Allen, K., Reupert, A., & Oades, L. G. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003025955 · Cited by 35
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0329-x · Cited by 38
The influence of reputation information on the assessment of undergraduate student work
Batten, J. C., Batey, J., Shafe, L., Gubby, L., & Birch, P. D. J. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.640928 · Cited by 28
A journey towards sustainable feedback
Mutch, A. J., Young, C., Davey, T. M., & Fitzgerald, L. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1332154 · Cited by 28
Using technology and structured peer reviews to enhance students’ writing
Law, S., & Baer, A. (2017) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787417740994 · Cited by 28
Improving peer‐review by developing reviewers' feedback literacy
Chong, S. W. (2021) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1378 · Cited by 27
Taylor, S., Ryan, M. E., & Pearce, J. M. (2015) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1024625 · Cited by 31
Wighus, M., & Bjørk, I. T. (2018) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2018.01.004 · Cited by 28
Hutt, S. J., DePiro, A., Wang, J., Rhodes, S., Baker, R. S., Hieb, G., Sethuraman, S., Ocumpaugh, J. L., & Mills, C. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636850 · Cited by 32
How do pre-service teacher education students respond to assessment feedback?
Grainger, P. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1096322 · Cited by 27
Making Use of Data for Assessments: Harnessing Analytics and Data Science
Ifenthaler, D., Greiff, S., & Gibson, D. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_41-1 · Cited by 27
Laxdal, A. G., Mjåtveit, A., Leibinger, É., Haugen, T., & Giske, R. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2019.1689164 · Cited by 27
Learning through assessment: An approach towards Self-Directed Learning
Annandale, M., Belkasim, S. O., Bunt, B. J., Chahine, I., Beer, J. J. D., Jacobson, T., Jagals, D., Kamanga, E. H., Mackey, T. P., Olivier, J., et al. (2021) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2021.bk280 · Cited by 42
Students’ Perspectives on the Role of Peer Feedback in Supporting Learning
Evans, C. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology · doi:10.1891/1945-8959.14.1.110 · Cited by 28
Understanding how students process and use feedback to support their learning
Hepplestone, S., & Chikwa, G. (2014) · Practitioner Research in Higher Education · Cited by 27
Innovative Assessment Techniques in Physical Education
Tariq, M. U., & Sergio, R. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3952-7.ch004 · Cited by 26
Middleton, T., Shafi, A. A., Millican, R., & Templeton, S. (2020) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1777397 · Cited by 26
Effect of video feedback on students’ feedback use in the online learning environment
YİĞİT, M. F., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2021) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1966489 · Cited by 26
Luo, J., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2088690 · Cited by 26
Feeding forward from summative assessment: the Essay Feedback Checklist as a learning tool
Wakefield, C. J., Adie, J. W., Pitt, E., & Owens, T. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.822845 · Cited by 26
An analysis of the effectiveness of feedback to students on assessed work
Taylor, C., & da Silva, K. B. (2013) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.863840 · Cited by 26
Dialogic Feed-Forward in Assessment: Pivotal to Learning but not Unproblematic
Hill, J., & West, H. (2022) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.20 · Cited by 27
The assessment-capable teacher: Are we all on the same page?
Booth, B., Hill, M., & Dixon, H. R. (2014) · Assessment Matters · doi:10.18296/am.0121 · Cited by 25
Percepciones de Estudiantes y Docentes: Evaluación Formativa en Proyectos de Aprendizaje Tutorados
Mínguez, L. M., Prados, L. M., Boza, C. N., & Ortíz, D. C. (2019) · Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.15366/riee2019.12.1.004 · Cited by 25
Hamond, L. F., Himonides, E., & Welch, G. F. (2020) · Journal of Music Technology and Education · doi:10.1386/jmte_00015_1 · Cited by 25
Hinojosa, D. M. (2022) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103582 · Cited by 22
Isenberg, G. A., Roy, V., Veloski, J. J., Berg, K. T., & Yeo, C. J. (2014) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.036 · Cited by 25
Assessment feedback only on demand: Supporting the few not supplying the many
Jones, O., & Gorra, A. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787413481131 · Cited by 28
Luetsch, K., & Burrows, J. A. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0783-1 · Cited by 26
Rethinking the teaching roles and assessment responsibilities of student teaching assistants
Wald, N., & Harland, T. (2018) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2018.1499883 · Cited by 25
From in the Class or in the Wild?
Wauck, H. C., Yen, Y.-C. G., Fu, W., Gerber, E. M., Dow, S. P., & Bailey, B. P. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025477 · Cited by 24
Twist and Shape: Feedback Practices within Creative Subject Content of Hairdressing Education
Öhman, A. (2018) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-017-9196-5 · Cited by 24
Bong, J. Y., & Park, M. S. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1727413 · Cited by 24
Observations of student accuracy in criteria-based self-assessment
Carroll, D. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1727411 · Cited by 28
An Argument-Based Framework for Validating Formative Assessment in the Classroom
Gu, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.605999 · Cited by 34
Can Relational Feed-Forward Enhance Students’ Cognitive and Affective Responses to Assessment?
Hill, J., Berlin, K. L., Choate, J., Cravens-Brown, L. M., McKendrick-Calder, L. A., & Smith, S. V. (2021) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.18 · Cited by 27
Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., Horbach, A., Keller, S., & Møller, J. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101847 · Cited by 28
A teacher competence development programme for supporting students’ reflection skills
Dekker-Groen, A., van der Schaaf, M. F., & Stokking, K. (2013) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2013.741837 · Cited by 24
Assessment for learning in Norway and Portugal: the case of primary school mathematics teaching
Nortvedt, G. A., Santos, L., & Pinto, J. (2015) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2015.1108900 · Cited by 28
Formative assessment in mathematics for engineering students
Fhloinn, E. N., & Carr, M. J. (2017) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1289500 · Cited by 24
Adams, G. (2018) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/0158037x.2018.1526782 · Cited by 30
The impact of feedback training for inspectors
Dobbelaer, M. J., Prins, F. J., & van Dongen, D. (2013) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/03090591311293301 · Cited by 24
Vattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2023.2192772 · Cited by 23
Assessment for Learning Instrumentation in Higher Education
Akib, E., & Ghafar, M. N. A. (2015) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v8n4p166 · Cited by 23
Ardill, N. (2025) · European Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/21568235.2025.2457466 · Cited by 35
He, J., Liu, Y., Ran, T., & Zhang, D. (2022) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-022-00654-5 · Cited by 23
Developing the students' ability to construct feedback
Nicol, D. (2011) · Cited by 23
Self-assessment of the oral presentation competence: Effects of gender and student’s performance
Cruz, A. M. B., & Tacoronte, D. V. (2018) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.04.001 · Cited by 23
Fatima, S., Ali, M., & Saad, M. I. (2022) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-07-2020-0209 · Cited by 24
The use of exemplars in English writing classrooms: from theory to practice
Chong, S. W. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1535051 · Cited by 22
Students’ use of evaluative judgement in an online peer learning community
Chen, L., Howitt, S. M., Higgins, D. M., & Murray, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1933378 · Cited by 22
From competition to metacognition
Foster, S. R., Esper, S., & Griswold, W. G. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470669 · Cited by 22
Assessment in Harmony with our Understanding of Learning: Problems and Possibilities
James, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446250808.n12 · Cited by 21
Parr, J. M., & Hawe, E. M. (2016) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1241818 · Cited by 22
Eather, N., Riley, N., Miller, D., & Jones, B. (2017) · doi:10.14221/ajte.2017v42n1.5 · Cited by 22
Duers, L. E. (2017) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.002 · Cited by 22
Mao, J. J., & Peck, K. L. (2013) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-06-2013-0003 · Cited by 22
Investigating non-engagement with feedback in higher education as a social practice
Jørgensen, B. M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1525691 · Cited by 25
Student experiences of live synchronised video feedback in formative assessment
Wilkie, B., & Liefeith, A. (2020) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1725879 · Cited by 22
Student Voices about the Role Feedback Plays in the Enhancement of their Learning
Plank, C., Dixon, H. R., & Ward, G. (2014) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n9.8 · Cited by 22
Bird, F. L., & Yucel, R. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.924476 · Cited by 21
Theorizing Formative Assessment: Time for a Change in Thinking
Moeed, A. (2015) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131725.2014.1002593 · Cited by 20
Medical students' experiences and needs from written reflective journal feedback
Rozental, L., Meitar, D., & Karnieli‐Miller, O. (2020) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14406 · Cited by 23
Berndt, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Fischer, F. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101197 · Cited by 22
Co-constructing a rubric checklist with first year university students
Bharuthram, S., & Patel, M. (2017) · Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies · doi:10.17011/apples/urn.201708073430 · Cited by 21
Dinning, T. (2017) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2017.1387085 · Cited by 20
Eather, N., Riley, N., Miller, D., & Imig, S. R. (2019) · Journal of Education and Training Studies · doi:10.11114/jets.v7i8.4053 · Cited by 22
Sturman, N. J., Jorm, C. M., & Parker, M. (2020) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-020-1084-7 · Cited by 22
Reframing doctoral examination as teaching
Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2017) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2017.1285715 · Cited by 20
Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2018) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.02.002 · Cited by 20
Abraham, R. M., & Singaram, V. S. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06084-9 · Cited by 20
Mohammadi, M., Abbasian, G.-R., & Siyyari, M. (2022) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-022-00173-6 · Cited by 25
Global perspectives of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on learning science in higher education
Salehi, S., Ballen, C. J., Laksov, K. B., Ismayilova, K., Poronnik, P., Ross, P. M., Tzioumis, V., & Wieman, C. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294821 · Cited by 19
How can learners practice evaluative judgement using qualitative self-assessment?
Gladovic, C., Tai, J., Nicola‐Richmond, K., & Dawson, P. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2291341 · Cited by 21
Actual and preferred teacher feedback on student blog writing
Chen, W.-C. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.635 · Cited by 19
E-Feedback as a Scaffolding Teaching Strategy in the Online Language Classroom
Alharbi, W. M. H. (2017) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239517697966 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadler, D. Royce
- ORCID
- Sadler, D. Royce
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2116967411
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 162.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- feedback effectiveness, student ability, tacit knowledge, task compliance, quality standards, student self-assessment, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
