The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students, feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they need to understand the meaning of the feedback statements. They also need to identify, with near certainty, the particular aspects of their work that need attention. For these to occur, students must possess critical background knowledge. This article sets out the nature of that knowledge and how students can acquire it. They must appropriate for themselves three fundamental concepts – task compliance, quality and criteria – and also develop a cache of relevant tacit knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, he proposed that student capability in ' complex appraisal ' was necessary for learning from feedback and that educators needed to do more to articulate the reasons for the information provided (i.e. quality notions) rather than providing information.”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This will help them develop appropriate evaluative judgement themselves in relation to criteria or standards and make more sense of and take greater control of their own learning (Boud and Soler 2016; Sadler 2010).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We identified these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
In the citing paper
“Sadler suggests that for information to become feedback, it must enable the learner to take action to remedy the gap between actual and desired performance [37].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“It is not feasible here to summarise the findings from the four major reviews of feedback carried out by Natriello (1987), Crooks (1988), Black and Wiliam (1998), and Hattie and Timperley (2007), except to note that all dealt predominantly with school-level learning.”
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationThe psychology of meaningful verbal learning.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) · Cited by 2,568
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413937 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 · Cited by 2,428
“Approaches that emphasise feedback as telling are insufficient because students are often not equipped to decode or act on statements satisfactorily, so key messages remain invisible (Sadler 2010).”
InfluentialHandbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315697048 · Cited by 1,977
Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education
Evans, C. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312474350 · Cited by 1,143
From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education.
Nicol, D. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602931003786559 · Cited by 1,060
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 · Cited by 884
Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3 · Cited by 810
“…these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialSustainable assessment revisited
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133 · Cited by 576
Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy
Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955 · Cited by 555
Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396 · Cited by 560
What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877 · Cited by 514
Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy
Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372 · Cited by 603
Davis, S., Duane, B. G., Loxley, A., & Quigley, D. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03630-1 · Cited by 482
Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback
Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12592 · Cited by 425
Cheng, A., Nadkarni, V., Mancini, M. B., Hunt, E. A., Sinz, E. H., Merchant, R. M., Donoghue, A. J., Duff, J. P., Eppich, W., Auerbach, M. A., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000583 · Cited by 457
The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154 · Cited by 414
Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education
Jonsson, A. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787412467125 · Cited by 414
The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes
Nicol, D. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314 · Cited by 402
Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach
Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. J. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863 · Cited by 364
Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education.
Lefroy, J., Watling, C., Teunissen, P. W., & Brand, P. (2015) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7 · Cited by 347
Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals
Carless, D. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108 · Cited by 328
Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes
Carless, D. R. (2014) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z · Cited by 314
Carless, D. R. (2020) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787420945845 · Cited by 320
Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible
Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001 · Cited by 276
Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics
Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365 · Cited by 261
What feedback literate teachers do: an empirically-derived competency framework
Boud, D. J., & Dawson, P. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928 · Cited by 277
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698 · Cited by 241
Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551 · Cited by 238
Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500 · Cited by 233
Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.598636 · Cited by 232
Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue
Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. J. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128 · Cited by 207
The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545 · Cited by 207
Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A delphi expert panel approach
Kloser, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21171 · Cited by 213
Crook, A. C., Mauchline, A. L., Maw, S. J., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., Orsmond, P., Gomez, S., & Park, J. R. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.025 · Cited by 193
Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future
Pastor, V. M. L., & Sicilia, Á. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535 · Cited by 253
Student perceptions of classroom feedback
Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2012.749212 · Cited by 184
Moving feedback forward: theory to practice
Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. C. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.625472 · Cited by 164
Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review
Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H. J., & Thorpe, L. (2011) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v19i2.10347 · Cited by 216
Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education
Nordmann, E., Horlin, C., Hutchison, J., Murray, J., Robson, L., Seery, M. K., & MacKay, J. R. D. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242 · Cited by 180
Managing dialogic use of exemplars
Carless, D., & Chan, K. K. H. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246 · Cited by 151
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410 · Cited by 177
Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment
Torrance, H. (2012) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2012.689693 · Cited by 217
Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment
Hill, J., & West, H. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908 · Cited by 196
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice
Harvey, M., & Luzia, K. (2013) · Cited by 141
Xu, Y., & Carless, D. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759 · Cited by 140
Rahman, K. M. A., & Zhang, D. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10113917 · Cited by 134
Sáiz, M. S. I., Gómez, G. R., & Boud, D. J. (2020) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2 · Cited by 178
Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education
Deeley, S. J. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1356906 · Cited by 163
Dowden, T., Pittaway, S. M., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.632676 · Cited by 128
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126
Brown, G., Harris, L. R., & Harnett, J. A. (2012) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.003 · Cited by 124
Carless, D. R. (2019) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1684455 · Cited by 123
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019 · Cited by 122
West, J., & Turner, W. (2015) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954 · Cited by 116
Summative co-assessment: A deep learning approach to enhancing employability skills and attributes
Deeley, S. J. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787413514649 · Cited by 110
Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement?
Sridharan, B., Tai, J., & Boud, D. J. (2018) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0305-7 · Cited by 106
Feelings About Feedback: The Role of Emotions in Assessment for Learning
Rowe, A. D. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_11 · Cited by 127
Brooks, C., Carroll, A., Gillies, R. M., & Hattie, J. (2019) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.2 · Cited by 105
To, J., & Carless, D. (2016) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2015.1014317 · Cited by 101
Bowen, L., Marshall, M., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001632 · Cited by 99
Wang, W. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993 · Cited by 114
Carless, D. R. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_389-1 · Cited by 98
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658 · Cited by 98
Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D. J., Dawson, P., Phillips, M., Molloy, E., & Mahoney, P. (2019) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787419872393 · Cited by 111
Tillema, H., Leenknecht, M. J. M., & Segers, M. S. R. (2011) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004 · Cited by 105
Hearing you loud and clear: student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education
Gould, J., & Day, P. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.660131 · Cited by 97
Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of marking guides, grade descriptors and annotated exemplars
Bell, A., Mladenovic, R., & Price, M. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.714738 · Cited by 95
Making judgements: investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback
McConlogue, T. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.868878 · Cited by 110
Takeda, S., & Homberg, F. (2013) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3088 · Cited by 93
Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review
Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620 · Cited by 107
Critical Perspectives on Service-Learning in Higher Education
Deeley, S. J. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137383259 · Cited by 92
Steinhardt, I., Schneijderberg, C., Götze, N., Baumann, J., & Krücken, G. (2016) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0045-5 · Cited by 117
Feedback Dialogues That Stimulate Students' Reflective Thinking
van der Schaaf, M. F., Baartman, L. K. J., Prins, F. J., Oosterbaan, A. E., & Schaap, H. (2011) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.628693 · Cited by 95
Agricola, B. T., Prins, F. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1688764 · Cited by 104
Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education
Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12363 · Cited by 91
Effectiveness of Using Screencast Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing and Perception
Ali, A. D. (2016) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v9n8p106 · Cited by 84
Vattøy, K.-D. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100828 · Cited by 99
Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes
Sadler, D. R. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1064858 · Cited by 87
Self-citationThe role of e‐portfolios in supporting productive learning
Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12316 · Cited by 78
“The Most Crushing Thing”: Understanding Resident Assessment Burden in a Competency-Based Curriculum
Ott, M. C., Pack, R., Cristancho, S., Chin, M., Koughnett, J. A. V., & Ott, M. C. (2022) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-22-00050.1 · Cited by 87
Catalán, E. L., & Kirk, D. (2015) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x15590352 · Cited by 77
Educating for the future: A conceptual framework of responsive pedagogy
Smith, K., Gamlem, S. M., Sandal, A. K., & Engelsen, K. S. (2016) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2016.1227021 · Cited by 94
Deeley, S. J., Fischbacher-Smith, M., Karadzhov, D., & Koristashevskaya, E. (2019) · Higher Education Pedagogies · doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1644659 · Cited by 76
Perusso, A., & Baaken, T. (2020) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100425 · Cited by 68
Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12096 · Cited by 78
Atkinson, D., & Lim, S. L. (2013) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.526 · Cited by 74
Chan, C. K. Y., & Luo, J. J. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1888074 · Cited by 87
Scaffolding theory: High challenge, high support in Academic Language and Learning (ALL) contexts
Wilson, K., & Devereux, L. (2014) · Journal of academic language and learning · Cited by 72
Morris, C., & Chikwa, G. (2016) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787416637482 · Cited by 71
Brooks, C., Burton, R., der Kleij, F. M. V., Ablaza, C., Carroll, A., Hattie, J., & Neill, S. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103387 · Cited by 77
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2020.1849371 · Cited by 111
Suraworachet, W., Zhou, Q., & Cukurova, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00368-0 · Cited by 68
Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. P. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.697868 · Cited by 68
Balloo, K., Evans, C., Hughes, A., Zhu, X., & Winstone, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00069 · Cited by 74
Liu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018 · Cited by 66
Assessment for Experiential Learning
Chan, C. K. Y. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003018391 · Cited by 82
Feed-forward assessment, exemplars and peer marking: evidence of efficacy
Wimshurst, K., & Manning, M. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.646236 · Cited by 66
Good and bad practices in rubrics: the perspectives of students and educators
Chan, C. Y. Z., & Ho, S. S. M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1522528 · Cited by 65
Hawe, E. M., Lightfoot, U., & Dixon, H. R. (2017) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2017.1349894 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadler, D. Royce
- ORCID
- Sadler, D. Royce
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2116967411
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 162.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- feedback effectiveness, student ability, tacit knowledge, task compliance, quality standards, student self-assessment, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
