The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students, feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they need to understand the meaning of the feedback statements. They also need to identify, with near certainty, the particular aspects of their work that need attention. For these to occur, students must possess critical background knowledge. This article sets out the nature of that knowledge and how students can acquire it. They must appropriate for themselves three fundamental concepts – task compliance, quality and criteria – and also develop a cache of relevant tacit knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, he proposed that student capability in ' complex appraisal ' was necessary for learning from feedback and that educators needed to do more to articulate the reasons for the information provided (i.e. quality notions) rather than providing information.”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This will help them develop appropriate evaluative judgement themselves in relation to criteria or standards and make more sense of and take greater control of their own learning (Boud and Soler 2016; Sadler 2010).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We identified these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
In the citing paper
“Sadler suggests that for information to become feedback, it must enable the learner to take action to remedy the gap between actual and desired performance [37].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“It is not feasible here to summarise the findings from the four major reviews of feedback carried out by Natriello (1987), Crooks (1988), Black and Wiliam (1998), and Hattie and Timperley (2007), except to note that all dealt predominantly with school-level learning.”
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationThe psychology of meaningful verbal learning.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) · Cited by 2,568
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413937 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 999
Active co-constructive written feedback
Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., Guerra, C., & Watts, M. (2019) · Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) · doi:10.1145/3362789.3362825 · Cited by 4
Huong, L. T. (2020) · VNU Journal of Foreign Studies · doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4505 · Cited by 4
Lu, W., & Mustapha, S. M. (2020) · doi:10.7176/jep/11-5-09 · Cited by 4
Overcoming the challenge of “fuzzy” assessment and feedback
Boyle, B., Mitchell, R. J., McDonnell, A., Sharma, N., Biswas, K., & Nicholas, S. (2020) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-08-2019-0183 · Cited by 5
Estonian science teacher beliefs about competence-based science e-testing
Rosin, T., Vaino, K., Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2021) · Science education international · doi:10.33828/sei.v32.i1.4 · Cited by 3
Combining Agile and DevOps to Improve Students’ Tech and Non-tech Skills
Cardoso, T. E., Chanin, R. M., Santos, A. R., & Sales, A. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0010401302990306 · Cited by 4
The active feedback program: bringing medical students out of the shadows
Edwardson, M. A. (2021) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1939842 · Cited by 4
Student involvement in assessment and power relations: teacher’s perspective
Jónsson, Í. R. (2023) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2023.2186930 · Cited by 7
Ifenthaler, D., & Şahi̇n, M. (2023) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-11-2022-0150 · Cited by 6
An interactive platform for formative assessment and immediate feedback in laboratory courses
Sfez, R. (2023) · Chemistry Teacher International · doi:10.1515/cti-2022-0049 · Cited by 5
Writing and Reading Connections: A before, during, and after Experience for Critical Thinkers
Deane, P., & Philippakos, Z. A. T. (2024) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.2284 · Cited by 13
Morris, J., & Stew, G. (2013) · International Journal of Practice-based Learning in Health and Social Care · doi:10.11120/pblh.2013.00006 · Cited by 4
Butakor, P. K. (2016) · African Research Review · doi:10.4314/afrrev.v10i5.11 · Cited by 4
Sağlam, A. L. G. (2017) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2706-0.ch020 · Cited by 4
Exploring Students’ Use of Feedback to Take Ownership and Deepen Learning in an Online Program
Thibodeaux, T., & Harapnuik, D. (2020) · International journal on e-learning · doi:10.70725/398366jeppeg · Cited by 4
Staying tuned: the impact of screen-captured video to support a multimedia approach to learning
Mayhew, E. (2020) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/s41304-020-00254-1 · Cited by 4
Formative assessment in foreign countries and in the Czech Republic
Laufková, V. (2017) · e-Pedagogium · doi:10.5507/epd.2017.008 · Cited by 4
Enabling the feedback process in work-based learning: an evaluation of the 5 minute feedback form
O’Malley, E., Scanlon, A.-M., Alpine, L., & McMahon, S. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1842852 · Cited by 5
Saliu-Abdulahi, D., & Hellekjær, G. O. (2020) · Acta Didactica Norden · doi:10.5617/adno.8299 · Cited by 4
Embedding Academic Literacies through Growing Student and Staff Communities
Malone, C., Coleman, C., Freeman, E., & Jamison-Powell, S. (2020) · Journal of Academic Writing · doi:10.18552/joaw.v10i1.625 · Cited by 4
Rubrics and Exemplars in Writing Assessment
de Leeuw, J. (2015) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23347-5_4 · Cited by 4
Aidonopoulou‐Read, T. (2019) · British Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12290 · Cited by 8
Barba-Martín, R. A., Alcalá, D. H., Pueyo, Á. P., & Santamaría, J. S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12218842 · Cited by 4
Mafenya, P. N. (2016) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 4
Uiseb, I. (2017) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 4
Clicker Interventions, Promoting Student Activity and Feedback at University Lectures
Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_189 · Cited by 4
Perumanathan, P. S. (2014) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17006677 · Cited by 4
Moni, A., Argüelles, M. J. M., & Serradell-López, E. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142411554 · Cited by 3
Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., & Fryer, L. K. (2025) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2025.2462024 · Cited by 9
The feedback process as a scaffold of evaluative judgement
Gladovic, C., Tai, J. H.-M., Nicola-Richmond, K., & Dawson, P. (2026) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2025.2559635 · Cited by 3
Perceptions of feedback: the use of self-reflection to improve student satisfaction
Sullivan, S., Gaydon, M., Panton, S., Nguyen, X. H., & Richardson, J. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2572034 · Cited by 4
Valencia‐Forrester, F. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2620646 · Cited by 5
Ofem, U. J., Asuquo, E. N., Nwannunu, B. I., Madukwe, E. C., Nsan, N. N., Adie, J. A., Ukatu, J. O., Nyong, P. A., Ebaye, A. S., & Robert, A. I. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102547 · Cited by 3
The Dimensions of Abundance in AI-Generated Feedback
Lindsay, E. D., Rodda, A. E., Lindqvist, A. L., Quince, Z., Lim, M., & Jiang, D. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16030465 · Cited by 3
Sturman, N. J., Fitzmaurice, L., Ingham, G., Lee, C., & Sheldrake, M. (2021) · Education for Primary Care · doi:10.1080/14739879.2020.1864781 · Cited by 3
How to Improve the Efficacy of Student Feedback
Chhabra, N., Kukreja, S., & Chhabra, S. (2021) · Indian Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s13312-022-2426-4 · Cited by 3
A Progressive Peer Review to Enhance Formative Learning
Nuninger, W., Hoogstoel, F., & Lancieri, L. (2023) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3537-3.ch001 · Cited by 3
The Use of a Rating Scale as a Formative and Shared Assessment Tool in Physical Education
Bores‐García, D., Barba-Martín, R. A., González‐Calvo, G., & Alcalá, D. H. (2023) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch005 · Cited by 3
Silén, C., Kilström, D., & Karlgren, K. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2369604 · Cited by 6
Beynen, T. (2024) · Brock Education Journal · doi:10.26522/brocked.v33i3.1179 · Cited by 4
Wu, L., & Li, T. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251328081 · Cited by 3
Co‐constructive feedback affordances in integrated performance assessment learner dyads
Darhower, M. A., & Smith‐Sherwood, D. (2025) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12805 · Cited by 3
Journaling and sketching in support of formative learning in engineering
Bernold, L. E. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale.2013.6654487 · Cited by 3
Scheduling refresher-based rescue and evacuation training for wind turbine technicians
Lawani, K. O., Hare, B., & Cameron, I. (2015) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0076484 · Cited by 3
Assessment and Feedback In the hands of the student
Nicol, D. (2011) · Cited by 3
The learning environment in upper secondary school physical education: The student perspective
Laxdal, A. G. (2020) · University of Stavanger eBooks · doi:10.31265/usps.56 · Cited by 3
Personal Educational Planning at Secondary School: Vision and Voice
Sutherland, S. (2015) · Cited by 3
Retroalimentación asertiva en un contexto de enseñanza a distancia como producto de la COVID-19
Usquiano, E. D. R. B., & Cuadros, M. J. L. (2021) · Llamkasun · doi:10.47797/llamkasun.v2i3.55 · Cited by 3
Strategies for giving feedback in the operating room
Marton, A., & Ashcroft, J. (2021) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141268 · Cited by 3
Uptake of formative feedback: perspective from a transnational education cohort
Menon, S., & Clyne, R. K. (2022) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20210052 · Cited by 3
Yang, F., Li, K., Yushuang, Z., & Li, R. (2022) · International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies (ICFET) · doi:10.1145/3545862.3545869 · Cited by 3
Challenges in Education – Policies, Practice and Research
Clipa, O. (2021) · Peter Lang D eBooks · doi:10.3726/b19119 · Cited by 5
Maunumäki, M., Maunula, M., & Harju‐Luukkainen, H. (2022) · Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science · doi:10.9734/jesbs/2022/v35i1130467 · Cited by 3
Multimodal Technology-Mediated Feedback in Second Language Writing Classes Through Screencasting
Savaşçı, M., & Akçor, G. (2022) · English language education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13540-8_6 · Cited by 3
Hadeli, H., Kustati, M., Zulfikar, T., Azmi, H. A., & Arumugam, N. (2023) · Studies in English Language and Education · doi:10.24815/siele.v10i2.29544 · Cited by 3
Lebo, D., & Anwar, S. (2023) · Journal of Social Science · doi:10.46799/jss.v4i6.96 · Cited by 3
Moons, F., Holvoet, A., Klingbeil, K., & Vandervieren, E. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13447 · Cited by 3
Peer Asse ssment In Reading Comprehension Facilitated By Padlet
Reyes, M. J. C., & Isabel, C. (2024) · Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar · doi:10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10474 · Cited by 3
O'Neill, G. M., & Guérin, S. (2015) · AISHE-J · doi:10.62707/aishej.v7i3.240 · Cited by 3
Hoo, H.-T., & Hughes, G. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_9 · Cited by 3
Diseño y validación de la escala Evaluación de los Aprendizajes (EEA)
Hebles, M., Santos, M. A. D., de Eulate, C. Y. Á., & Villardón-Gallego, L. (2017) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v21i2.10327 · Cited by 3
Instruktøren som veileder – i spennetmellom rollene som pedagog og politi
Eckblad, K. (2020) · Uniped · doi:10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2020-01-04 · Cited by 3
Quelle place pour les émotions des étudiants lorsqu’ils reçoivent des feedbacks à l’université ?
Hausman, M., Verpoorten, D., & Detroz, P. (2022) · Spirale - Revue de recherches en éducation · doi:10.3917/spir.069.0037 · Cited by 3
Ikaskuntzarako atzeraelikadura-matrize bat
Brooks, C., Carroll, A., Gillies, R. M., & Hattie, J. (2022) · Hizpide: euskalduntze - alfabetatzearen aldizkaria · doi:10.54512/psok9612 · Cited by 3
Criterios de evaluación y retroalimentación formativa: perspectivas docentes
Monje, V. Y. (2022) · HUMAN REVIEW International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades · doi:10.37467/revhuman.v11.3875 · Cited by 3
Conceptualising a Model of Feedback in Higher Education
Karlsen, K. H. (2015) · Nordic Studies in Education · doi:10.18261/issn1891-5949-2015-02-06 · Cited by 3
Teachers as mediators: Formative practices with assessment criteria and standards
Dargusch, J. (2014) · The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy · doi:10.1007/bf03651948 · Cited by 3
Using iAnnotate to enhance feedback on written work
Upson‐Saia, K., & Scott, S. (2013) · Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology · Cited by 3
Examining Characteristics of Teacher Feedback in Organizing Written Texts
Çetinkaya, G. (2015) · Pamukkale University Open Access Archive (Pamukkale University) · Cited by 3
Flipping a Collaborative Classroom to Gain Deeper Understanding of the Health System
Mutch, A. J., Young, C., Smith, N., van Dooren, K., Ranatunga, C., Gillan, C., Brooker, K., Fowler, G., & Fitzgerald, L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_16 · Cited by 3
Mok, M. M. C., & Lee, W. O. (2017) · Education in the Asia-Pacific region · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3654-5_32 · Cited by 3
Pupils’ Information Processing and Its Implications for Learning and Assessment: A Think-Aloud Study
Rogne, W. M., & Gamlem, S. M. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2017.1402369 · Cited by 4
Calvet, N. J., Rochera, M. J., Remesal, A., & de Arana, N. D. S. (2017) · Perspectiva educacional · doi:10.4151/07189729-vol.57-iss.1-art.617 · Cited by 3
Northcote, M. T., Morton, L., Williams, A. P., Kilgour, P. W., & Hattingh, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness · doi:10.5325/jasseinsteffe.7.1-2.0041 · Cited by 5
Mjåtveit, A., & Giske, R. (2020) · Acta Didactica Norden · doi:10.5617/adno.7910 · Cited by 3
Maximising Student Success through the Development of Self-Regulation
Evans, C., Zhu, X., Winstone, N., Balloo, K., Hughes, A., & Bright, C. (2019) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.21930.44481 · Cited by 3
Feedback in Tertiary Education
van der Meer, J., & Dawson, P. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.014 · Cited by 3
Sánchez, G., & Jara, X. E. (2021) · Formación universitaria · doi:10.4067/s0718-50062021000300075 · Cited by 4
Comparative judgement and the hierarchy of students’ choice criteria
Palisse, J., King, D., & MacLean, M. (2021) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2021.1962553 · Cited by 3
Fadzil, I. M., & Said, N. E. M. (2021) · Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) · doi:10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.993 · Cited by 3
Teaching advancement with Phased Assessments and Looped Feedback (PALF) model
Abadi, H. A., Mainali, B., & Lumantarna, E. (2022) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2022.2145937 · Cited by 3
Medienbildung für Schule und Unterricht
Kiesler, N., & Weers, C. (2022) · MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung · doi:10.21240/mpaed/00/2022.11.25.x · Cited by 3
Feedback to align teacher and student in a Digital Learning Ecosystem
Pentucci, M., Sarra, A., & Laici, C. (2023) · EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY · doi:10.3280/ess1-2023oa15761 · Cited by 4
The Implications of Literacy Teaching Models
Gunawardena, M. (2017) · International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.1p.94 · Cited by 3
Adaptive Comparative Judgment: A Tool to Support Students' Assessment Literacy
Rhind, S. M., Hughes, K., Yool, D. A., Shaw, D. J., Kerr, W., & Reed, N. (2017) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme.0616-113r · Cited by 3
Gloria, R. Y., Sudarmin, Wiyanto, W., & Indriyanti, D. R. (2019) · Journal of Turkish Science Education · Cited by 3
Rothermel, P., & Goiria, M. (2012) · Cited by 3
Maximizing Feedback for Self-Regulated Learning
Hemerda, J. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 3
Plana-Erta, D. (2016) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-98128 · Cited by 2
Carless, D. R. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_389 · Cited by 3
Feedback in Writing Portfolio Assessment
Lam, R. (2018) · SpringerBriefs in Education · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1174-1_5 · Cited by 2
Key capabilities for promoting student feedback literacy
Mamad, A. (2022) · The Hungarian Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1556/063.2022.00164 · Cited by 4
Assessment Feedback: What Do Students Want and Need?
Holt, D., Sun, X., & Davies, B. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/tv2dfa83 · Cited by 3
Activating students in feedback and assessment processes in physical education
Treschman, P., Stylianou, M., Brooks, C., & Sperka, L. (2025) · Sport Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2025.2510427 · Cited by 2
Baroudi, S., Mubeen, N., & Karaki, S. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2527302 · Cited by 4
Rana, K., & Rana, K. (2025) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2025.19854 · Cited by 2
Su, W., & Huang, A. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12850 · Cited by 4
Student Feedback Use During Cross-Age Peer Tutoring
Swanson, E., Mauer, E., Shanahan, E., Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2026) · The Elementary school journal · doi:10.1086/739254 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadler, D. Royce
- ORCID
- Sadler, D. Royce
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2116967411
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 162.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- feedback effectiveness, student ability, tacit knowledge, task compliance, quality standards, student self-assessment, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
