The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students, feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they need to understand the meaning of the feedback statements. They also need to identify, with near certainty, the particular aspects of their work that need attention. For these to occur, students must possess critical background knowledge. This article sets out the nature of that knowledge and how students can acquire it. They must appropriate for themselves three fundamental concepts – task compliance, quality and criteria – and also develop a cache of relevant tacit knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Here, he proposed that student capability in ' complex appraisal ' was necessary for learning from feedback and that educators needed to do more to articulate the reasons for the information provided (i.e. quality notions) rather than providing information.”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sadler also suggested that an additional method for developing this capability was peer review or assessment, which was also taken up by Gielen et al. (2011).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This will help them develop appropriate evaluative judgement themselves in relation to criteria or standards and make more sense of and take greater control of their own learning (Boud and Soler 2016; Sadler 2010).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We identified these pedagogies as developing evaluative judgement through the consideration of previous conceptual work which touched on the notion that students need a sense of quality to successfully undertake study and conduct their future lives as graduates (e.g. Sadler 2010; Boud and Falchikov 2007).”
From Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2018) · cites this paper as Sadler 2010
In the citing paper
“Sadler suggests that for information to become feedback, it must enable the learner to take action to remedy the gap between actual and desired performance [37].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“It is not feasible here to summarise the findings from the four major reviews of feedback carried out by Natriello (1987), Crooks (1988), Black and Wiliam (1998), and Hattie and Timperley (2007), except to note that all dealt predominantly with school-level learning.”
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P., & Ramsden, P. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203507711 · Cited by 5,148
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Self-citationThe psychology of meaningful verbal learning.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) · Cited by 2,568
Learning to Teach in Higher Education
Ramsden, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413937 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 999
Scaling Up Assessment for Learning: Progress and Prospects
Carless, D. R. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_1 · Cited by 66
Bridging classroom assessment and self-regulated learning
Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2020.1803589 · Cited by 85
Self-assessment to incite learning in higher education: developing ontological awareness
Bourke, R. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1411881 · Cited by 61
Developing Research Competence in Undergraduate Students through Hands on Learning
Davidson, Z. E., & Palermo, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Education · doi:10.1155/2015/306380 · Cited by 73
Developing a framework for effective audio feedback: a case study
Hennessy, C., & Forrester, G. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.870530 · Cited by 61
Catalán, E. L., & Kirk, D. (2013) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x13496004 · Cited by 66
Student perspectives on formative feedback as part of writing portfolios
Bader, M., Burner, T., Iversen, S. H., & Varga, Z. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1564811 · Cited by 61
Educators’ perceptions of responsibility-sharing in feedback processes
Winstone, N., Pitt, E., & Nash, R. A. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1748569 · Cited by 64
Sustainable assessment for lifelong learning
Nguyen, T. T. H., & Walker, M. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.985632 · Cited by 59
McLean, A., Bond, C. H., & Nicholson, H. D. (2014) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.855718 · Cited by 59
Wilson, M. J., Diao, M. M., & Huang, L. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.881980 · Cited by 59
What Is My Next Step? School Students' Perceptions of Feedback
Brooks, C., Huang, Y., Hattie, J., Carroll, A., & Burton, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00096 · Cited by 58
Tai, J., Canny, B. J., Haines, T. P., & Molloy, E. (2016) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1247000 · Cited by 65
Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature
Sadler, I., Reimann, N., & Sambell, K. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434 · Cited by 67
Myyry, L., Karaharju‐Suvanto, T., Virtala, A., Raekallio, M. R., Salminen, O., Vesalainen, M., & Nevgi, A. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1887812 · Cited by 61
Supporting Peer Feedback on Learning Strategies: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Feedback Quality
Bürgermeister, A., Glogger‐Frey, I., & Saalbach, H. (2021) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/14757257211016604 · Cited by 71
Students’ perception of teachers’ two-way feedback interactions that impact learning
Tan, F., Whipp, P. R., Gagné, M., & Quaquebeke, N. V. (2018) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9473-7 · Cited by 73
Blair, A. (2016) · Politics · doi:10.1177/0263395716633904 · Cited by 55
What makes good feedback good?
O’Donovan, B. M., den Outer, B., Price, M., & Lloyd, A. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1630812 · Cited by 55
Game-Based Assessment: The Past Ten Years and Moving Forward
Kim, Y. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2019) · Advances in game-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15569-8_1 · Cited by 57
Conceptions of Good Teaching by Good Teachers: Case Studies from an Australian University
Duarte, F. (2013) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.10.1.5 · Cited by 54
Challenges for IT-Enabled Formative Assessment of Complex 21st Century Skills
Webb, M., Prasse, D., Phillips, M., Kadijevich, D. M., Angeli, C., Strijker, A., Carvalho, A. A. A., Andresen, B. B., Dobozy, E., & Laugesen, H. (2018) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-018-9379-7 · Cited by 53
Deane, P. (2018) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844 · Cited by 62
La evaluación formativa en docencia universitaria y el rendimiento académico del alumnado
Fraile, A., Pastor, V. M. L., Castejón, F. J., & Romero, R. (2013) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 57
Making Competent Judgments of Competence
Sadler, D. R. (2013) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-867-4_2 · Cited by 52
Self-citationFinessing Feedback: Recommendations for Effective Feedback in the Emergency Department
Buckley, C., Natesan, S. M., Breslin, A. W., & Gottlieb, M. A. (2019) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.016 · Cited by 50
Jansen, T., Höft, L., Bahr, L., Fleckenstein, J., Møller, J., Köller, O., & Meyer, J. (2024) · Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht · doi:10.2378/peu2024.art08d · Cited by 58
Learner experience in artificial intelligence-scaffolded argumentation
Kim, M. K., Kim, N. J., & Heidari, A. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2042792 · Cited by 51
Voerman, L., Korthagen, F. A. J., Meijer, P. C., & Simons, R. J. (2014) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.005 · Cited by 53
Effective Feedback Design Using Free Technologies
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115571929 · Cited by 56
La evaluación auténtica: el uso de la evaluación para ayudar a los estudiantes a aprende
Brown, S. A. (2015) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.7203/relieve.21.2.7674 · Cited by 49
The impact of critical feedback choice on students' revision, performance, learning, and memory
Cutumisu, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.029 · Cited by 54
Jónsson, Í., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2017) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003 · Cited by 61
Students' and teachers' views of written feedback at undergraduate level: A literature review
Agius, N. M., & Wilkinson, A. (2014) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.005 · Cited by 72
Peng, M. Y., Feng, Y., Zhao, X., & Chong, W.-L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583722 · Cited by 48
Berndt, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Fischer, F. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0343-z · Cited by 54
Adie, L. E., der Kleij, F. M. V., & Cumming, J. (2018) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3463 · Cited by 48
Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges
Lee, I. (2013) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009 · Cited by 47
Building students’ evaluative and productive expertise in the writing classroom
Hawe, E. M., & Dixon, H. R. (2013) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.004 · Cited by 51
Understanding Learning and Learning Design in MOOCs: A Measurement-Based Interpretation
Milligan, S., & Griffin, P. (2016) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2016.32.5 · Cited by 47
The case for using exemplars to develop academic self-efficacy
Dixon, H. R., Hawe, E. M., & Hamilton, R. J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1666084 · Cited by 50
Practising what we preach: towards a student-centred definition of feedback
Scott, S. V. (2013) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.827639 · Cited by 60
Electronic Feedback or Handwritten Feedback: What Do Undergraduate Students Prefer and Why?
Spitzer, B. A., McGoron, F. X., Williams, E. E., Bakerson, M. A., Watson, A. B., & Chang, N. (2012) · Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology · Cited by 46
Towards an integrated model for developing sustainable assessment skills
Fastré, G., van der Klink, M. R., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.674484 · Cited by 49
Yucel, R., Bird, F. L., Young, J., & Blanksby, T. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.880400 · Cited by 66
No longer exempt from good practice: using exemplars to close the feedback gap for exams
Scoles, J., Huxham, M., & McArthur, J. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.674485 · Cited by 52
Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1476669 · Cited by 64
Identifying the components of effective learner-centred feedback information
Ryan, T., Henderson, M., Ryan, K., & Kennedy, G. E. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1913723 · Cited by 46
Feedforward strategies in the first-year experience of online and distributed learning environments
Baker, D. J., & Zuvela, D. S. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691153 · Cited by 43
Chokwe, J. M. (2015) · Open Praxis · doi:10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.154 · Cited by 43
McConlogue, T. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.515010 · Cited by 41
Perceptions of quality in staff-student written feedback in higher education: a case study
Dunworth, K., & Sánchez, H. S. (2016) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1160219 · Cited by 42
The contribution of reflective learning to experiential learning in business education
Perusso, A., Blankesteijn, M., & Leal, R. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1705963 · Cited by 40
Designing learner-centred text-based feedback: a rapid review and qualitative synthesis
Ryan, T., Henderson, M., Ryan, K., & Kennedy, G. E. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1828819 · Cited by 47
Beaumont, C. D., Moscrop, C., & Canning, S. (2014) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2014.953460 · Cited by 42
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review
Stenberg, M., Mangrio, E., Bengtsson, M., & Carlson, E. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345 · Cited by 45
Informed Reflexivity: Enacting Epistemic Virtue
Weinstock, M. P., Kienhues, D., Feucht, F. C., & Ryan, M. E. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1349662 · Cited by 47
Zhan, Y. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105 · Cited by 40
Crimmins, G., Nash, G., Oprescu, F., Liebergreen, M., Turley, J., Bond, R., & Dayton, J. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.986644 · Cited by 41
Cen, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100802 · Cited by 54
Developing students’ capacities for evaluative judgement through analysing exemplars
Carless, D. R., Chan, K. K. H., To, J., Lo, M., & Barrett, E. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315109251-12 · Cited by 40
Turning a traditional teaching setting into a feedback-rich environment
González, A. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0114-1 · Cited by 47
Matthews, K., Tai, J., Enright, E., Carless, D. R., Rafferty, C., & Winstone, N. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1903854 · Cited by 49
What are we missing? Spanish lecturers’ perceptions of their assessment practices
Serra, V. Q., Gómez, G. R., & Sáiz, M. S. I. (2014) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.930353 · Cited by 40
Nordic Educational Research Association (2024) · Nordic Studies in Education · doi:10.18261/issn.1891-5949 · Cited by 40
MacKay, J. R. D., Hughes, K., Marzetti, H., Lent, N., & Rhind, S. M. (2019) · Higher Education Pedagogies · doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1601500 · Cited by 39
Ryan, M. E. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09271-3_1 · Cited by 39
Song, B. K. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2042187 · Cited by 42
Sin, S., & McGuigan, N. (2013) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2013.847320 · Cited by 38
Perceptions and realities in the functions and processes of assessment
Taras, M., & Davies, M. S. (2012) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787412467128 · Cited by 38
Comparative Judgement as a Promising Alternative to Score Competences
Lesterhuis, M., Verhavert, S., Coertjens, L., Donche, V., & Mæyer, S. D. (2016) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0531-0.ch007 · Cited by 38
O'Neill, G. M. (2017) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2017.1324805 · Cited by 39
Bouwer, R., Lesterhuis, M., Bonne, P., & Mæyer, S. D. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00086 · Cited by 53
What’s in a word? Practices associated with ‘feedforward’ in higher education
Reimann, N., Sadler, I., & Sambell, K. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600655 · Cited by 38
Using rubrics and exemplars to develop students’ evaluative and productive knowledge and skill
Hawe, E. M., Dixon, H. R., Murray, J., & Chandler, S. (2020) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2020.1851358 · Cited by 37
Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback at a Private University in Pakistan
Ghazal, L., Gul, R. B., Hanzala, M., Jessop, T. S., & Tharani, A. J. (2014) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p13 · Cited by 37
Students’ use of a rubric for research theses
Prins, F. J., de Kleijn, R. A. M., & van Tartwijk, J. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954 · Cited by 37
Assessment for Learning in English Language Classrooms in China: Contexts, Problems, and Solutions
Jun, L., & Xu, Y. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-60092-9_2 · Cited by 37
Feedback and Feed-Forward for Promoting Problem-Based Learning in Online Learning Environments
Moallem, M., & Webb, A. (2016) · Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction · doi:10.32890/mjli2016.13.2.1 · Cited by 37
Empowering Learners Using Active Learning in Higher Education Institutions
Sewagegn, A. A., & Diale, B. M. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.80838 · Cited by 37
Why only feedback? Including feed up and feed forward improves non-linguistic aspects of L2 writing
Zarrinabadi, N., & Rezazadeh, M. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820960725 · Cited by 48
Undergraduate student responses to feedback: expectations and experiences
Small, F., & Attree, K. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007944 · Cited by 37
Rethinking feedback in higher education: an assessment for learning perspective
Sambell, K. (2011) · Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) · Cited by 37
Designing effective peer assessment processes in higher education: a systematic review
Fleckney, P., Thompson, J., & Vaz‐Serra, P. (2024) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2024.2407083 · Cited by 36
La voz del estudiante en la evaluación del aprendizaje: un camino por recorrer en la universidad
Gómez, G. R., Sáiz, M. S. I., Noche, M. B. G., Ruíz, M. Á. G., & Serra, V. Q. (2012) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.7203/relieve.18.2.1985 · Cited by 36
What factors promote student resilience on a level 1 distance learning module?
Simons, J., Beaumont, K., & Holland, L. (2017) · Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/02680513.2017.1415140 · Cited by 39
Supporting teacher responsiveness in assessment for learning through disciplined noticing
Cowie, B., Harrison, C. A., & Willis, J. (2018) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585176.2018.1481442 · Cited by 40
Ayalon, M., & Wilkie, K. J. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.103011 · Cited by 39
Student peer review as a process of knowledge creation through dialogue
Reddy, K., Harland, T., Wass, R., & Wald, N. (2021) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1781797 · Cited by 36
Clickers and formative feedback at university lectures
Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2015) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9437-x · Cited by 40
Assessment and feedback in higher education: considerable room for improvement?
Sambell, K. (2016) · Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) · Cited by 35
Man, D., Xu, Y., & O’Toole, J. M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1376310 · Cited by 35
Engagement and Challenges in Supervisory Feedback: Supervisors’ and Students’ Perceptions
Bastola, M. N. (2020) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220912547 · Cited by 35
Technology enhanced assessment: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations
Fuller, R., Joynes, V. C. T., Nadarajah, V. D., Treasure-Jones, T., Yeates, P., Scott, K. M., Webb, A. L., Valter, K., & Pyörälä, E. (2022) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2083489 · Cited by 43
An examination of the impact of COVID-19 on assessment practices in higher education
Mottiar, Z., Byrne, G., Gorham, G., & Robinson, E. (2022) · European Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/21568235.2022.2125422 · Cited by 42
The focus and substance of formative comment provided by PhD examiners
Holbrook, A., Bourke, S. F., Fairbairn, H., & Lovat, T. (2012) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.750289 · Cited by 35
Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology
Deneen, C. C., Brown, G., & Carless, D. R. (2017) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752 · Cited by 35
Enhancing self-regulated learning through using written feedback in higher education
Ion, G., Cano, E., & Fernández-Ferrer, M. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.06.002 · Cited by 35
An Intelligent Nudging System to Guide Online Learners
Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero‐Roldán, A., Bañeres, D., & Karadeniz, A. (2022) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.5407 · Cited by 34
Setting formative assessments in real-world contexts to facilitate self-regulated learning
Tay, H. Y. (2015) · Educational Research for Policy and Practice · doi:10.1007/s10671-015-9172-5 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadler, D. Royce
- ORCID
- Sadler, D. Royce
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 535-550
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2116967411
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 162.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- feedback effectiveness, student ability, tacit knowledge, task compliance, quality standards, student self-assessment, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
