Cited by 115Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Psychedelic microdosing: a subreddit analysis

Lea, Toby, Amada, Nicole, Jungaberle, Henrik·2020·Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Abstract

Self-administration of very low doses of psychedelic drugs to improve mental health and wellbeing and enhance cognitive function, known as microdosing, has received recent media attention, but little research has been conducted. We conducted a content analysis of discussions about microdosing from the online forum Reddit. We examined motivations, dosing practices, and perceived benefits and limitations of microdosing. Motivations included self-management of mental health issues, improvement of psychosocial wellbeing, and cognitive enhancement. Self-reported benefits included cognitive and creative enhancement, reduced depression and anxiety, enhanced self-insight and mindfulness, improved mood and attitude toward life, improved habits and health behaviors, and improved social interactions and interpersonal connections. Perceived limitations included issues related to dosing, adverse physical effects, taking illegal substances, limited or no mental health or cognitive improvement, increased anxiety, unpleasant "off" days, only short-term benefits, and concerns about dependence and drug-related risks. Standard doses of psychedelic drugs provided in therapeutic settings have potential as novel treatments for some mental health conditions, but clinical research is needed to understand if this is also the case for microdosing. In the meantime, harm reduction resources should be developed and made available to provide the best available information on the safer use of self-administered psychedelics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02791072.2019.1683260

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This reduction of top-down control facilitates increased levels of creativity through divergent thinking, leading to novel problem-solving solutions and contributing to the recent rise in microdosing protocols among high-performing creative professionals.

    “This reduction of top-down control facilitates increased levels of creativity through divergent thinking (Preller and V ollenweider 2018; Abraham et al. 2012), leading to novel problem-solving solutions and contributing to the recent rise in microdosing protocols among high-performing creative professionals (Lea et al. 2019; Polito and Stevenson 2019).”
  • Some adults diagnosed with ADHD report using low, sub-hallucinogenic doses of psychedelic substances repeatedly (microdosing) to self-treat their symptoms and improve daily life functioning.

    “Survey research has shown that some adults diagnosed with ADHD report using low, sub-hallucinogenic doses of psychedelic substances repeatedly, referred to as microdosing (MD), to self-treat their symptoms and as such to improve daily life functioning (4–7).”
  • Enhanced levels of mindfulness have been reported after MD.

    “Interestingly, enhanced levels of mindfulness have been reported after MD (6)”
  • The finding that mindfulness was enhanced in MD individuals is in line with previous studies reporting this association, but in contrast to one previous prospective MD study that did not find any changes in mindfulness after 6 weeks of MD.

    “The finding that mindfulness was enhanced in MD individuals is in line with previous studies reporting this association (6, 11), but in contrast to one previous prospective MD study that did not find any changes in mindfulness after 6 weeks of MD (13).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lea, T., Amada, N., & Jungaberle, H.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • MIND European Foundation for Psychedelic Science, Berlin, Germany
Corresponding author
Lea, Toby
Venue
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
2019-10-24
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
101-112
ISSN
  • 0279-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-9777
OpenAlex
W2981686921
Cited by
115
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (NA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
psychedelic microdosing, Reddit discussions, online forums, mental health self-management, cognitive enhancement, psychosocial well-being, anxiety and depression, harm reduction, drug addiction
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Psychosocial Functioning, Adult, Behavioral Symptoms, Cognition, Hallucinogens, Humans, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, Psilocybin, Self Administration, Qualitative Research, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review