Cited by 72Nutritional Studies and DietPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesNuts composition and effects

Strawberry intake, lipids, C-reactive protein, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women

Sesso, Howard D., Gaziano, J. Michael, Jenkins, David J.A., Buring, Julie E.·2007·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is indirect evidence suggesting that strawberries, containing several key nutrients, may be associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In the Women's Health Study, we examined strawberry intake for both its prospective association with CVD risk in 38,176 women and its cross-sectional association with lipids and C-reactive protein (CRP) in a subset of 26,966 women. METHODS: Strawberry intake was assessed from a baseline semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire, along with other self-reported lifestyle, clinical and dietary factors. Participants returned baseline bloods which were assayed for lipids and CRP. We computed the relative risks (RRs) for total CVD (1,004 cases) (including confirmed myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and cardiovascular death) occurring during 10.9 years of follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 25.6%, 41.9%, 24.8%, and 7.7% of women reported corresponding strawberry intake of none, 1-3 servings/month, 1 serving/week, and > or =2 servings/week. For total CVD, the multivariate RRs (95% confidence intervals) for increasing categories of strawberry intake were 1.00 (ref), 1.01 (0.85-1.19), 0.95 (0.77-1.17), and 1.27 (0.94-1.72) (P, trend = 0.06). We found a similar lack of an association for individual cardiovascular endpoints and comparing mean levels of lipids and CRP by category of strawberry intake. However, women consuming > or =2 servings/week versus none had a borderline significant, multivariate 14% lower likelihood of an elevated CRP of > or =3 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Strawberry intake was unassociated with the risk of incident CVD, lipids, or CRP in middle-aged and older women, though higher strawberry intake may slightly reduce the likelihood of having elevated CRP levels. Additional epidemiologic data are needed to clarify any role of strawberries in CVD prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719615

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Women's Health Study, blueberry intake was not significantly associated with risks of CVD or CRP.

    “Blueberry intake was also examined in the study and no significant association was reported with risks of CVD or CRP.”

    From Berries: emerging impact on cardiovascular health (2010) · cites this paper as [29]

  • The Women's Health Study showed a borderline significant risk reduction of elevated C-reactive protein levels (≥3 mg/L) among women consuming higher amounts of strawberries (≥2 servings/week).

    “The study also showed a borderline significant risk reduction of elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (≥3 mg/L) among women consuming higher amounts of strawberries (≥2 servings/week).”

    From Berries: emerging impact on cardiovascular health (2010) · cites this paper as [29]

  • In the Women's Health Study, during a follow-up period of approximately 11 years, a decreasing trend for CVD was observed for subjects consuming higher amounts of strawberries (P = 0.06).

    “During a follow-up period of approximately 11 years, a decreasing trend for CVD was observed for subjects consuming higher amounts of strawberries (P = 0.06).”

    From Berries: emerging impact on cardiovascular health (2010) · cites this paper as [29]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sesso, H. D., Gaziano, J. M., Jenkins, D. J. A., & Buring, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Sesso, Howard D.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2007-08
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
303-310
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2073730330
Cited by
72
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns034108-02, 5r01hl043851-10, 1r03hl065727-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG15933, R01AG015933)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL43851, HL-65727)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-47988, R01CA047988)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-34108)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
Keywords
cardiovascular risk, C-reactive protein, serum lipids, women, fruit consumption, inflammation, cardiovascular disease prevention, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Alcohol Drinking, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Humans, Lipids, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Multivariate Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Fragaria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review