Cited by 68Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutritional Studies and Diet

A Study of the Importance of Education and Cost Incentives on Individual Food Choices at the Harvard School of Public Health Cafeteria

Open access
Michels, Karin B., Bloom, Barry R., Riccardi, Paul, Rosner, Bernard A., Willett, Walter C.·2008·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the importance of cost and awareness of health- or disease-promoting properties of foods and meals for choices by customers of a cafeteria. DESIGN: A non-randomized intervention study. SETTING: A medium size cafeteria in the Harvard School of Public Health. PARTICIPANTS: Customers of the cafeteria mainly consisting of public health students, faculty, and school staff and workers from the medical campus. INTERVENTION: The purchase of healthy foods and dishes was subsidized and their prices reduced by 20%. This promotion was accompanied by the distribution of educational material. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in consumption of healthy and less healthy foods. ANALYSIS: The geometric mean was used to calculate the change in consumption. RESULTS: During the intervention, we observed a 6% increase in the consumption of healthy foods (95% confidence interval [CI]; 5% to 8%), and a 2% decline in the consumption of less-healthy foods (95% CI; -1% to -4%). After the prices returned to their original levels, the consumption of healthy foods increased further to 17% (95% CI; 13% to 20%) and a 2% decline in the consumption of less-healthy foods (95% CI; % 1 to -5%) persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Subsidizing healthful meals and educating consumers about the importance of a healthy diet can result in a modest increase in the selection of healthy foods and meals that can be maintained beyond the periods of subsidy and promotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2008.10719669

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michels, K. B., Bloom, B. R., Riccardi, P., Rosner, B. A., & Willett, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Michels, Karin B.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2008-02
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
6-11
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2160123468
Cited by
68
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK040561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
food choice, food subsidies, healthy eating, nutrition education, dietary intake, dietary behavior change, food prices, Harvard School of Public Health
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Making, Female, Food, Food Preferences, Food Services, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Motivation, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Students, Universities, Food, Organic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review