Cited by 80Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and PenologyRestraint-Related Deaths

Assessing public perceptions of police use-of-force: legal reasonableness and community standards

Mourtgos, Scott M., Adams, Ian T.·2020·Justice Quarterly

Abstract

How do public expectations of police use-of-force align with the strict professional and legal guidelines under which police officers train and operate? This is a largely unexamined but salient question in the use-of-force literature and is important given the ongoing public discourse regarding police use-of-force, community standards, and perceived gaps between the two. This study focuses on two main research questions: Are substantial portions of the public predisposed to disapprove of legally reasonable police use-of-force? If so, what are the principal correlates of those disapproving attitudes? We analyze responses (n = 20,781) to General Social Survey (GSS) questions from 1990 through 2018 entailing police use-of-force scenarios that are prima facie legally reasonable. We find a substantial proportion of GSS respondents have expressed their disapproval of legally reasonable, justifiable police uses-of-force over the entire period, and such disapproval has increased over time. Causes and policy implications of this misalignment are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07418825.2019.1679864

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most citizens know relatively little about many criminal justice institutions, yet public judgments of policy interventions often emerge from limited, context-specific information.

    “In reality, most citizens know relatively little about many criminal justice institutions, yet public judgments of policy interventions often emerge from limited, context-specific information (34, 35).”

    From Does civilian oversight impact police legitimacy? (2025) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mourtgos, S. M., & Adams, I. T.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Mourtgos, Scott M.
Venue
Justice Quarterly
Published
2019-10-26
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
869-899
ISSN
  • 0741-8825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9109
OpenAlex
W2982191876
Cited by
80
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
22.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Justice Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
Keywords
police use of force, public perception, community standards, police legitimacy, General Social Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review