CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 407Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of System Trust in Business-to-Consumer Transactions

PENNINGTON, ROBIN, WILCOX, H. DIXON, GROVER, VARUN·2003·Journal of Management Information Systems
DOI 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045777
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It has been argued that the buyer's trust of the vendor is a critical precursor to a transactional relationship in an e-commerce environment. This study uses an experimental survey to test a model that includes a number of factors such as trust mechanisms, "system trust," and vendor reputation. The results suggest that one trust mechanism, vendor guarantees, has a direct influence on system trust. Further, within e-commerce situations, system trust plays an important role in the nomological network by directly affecting trust in vendors and indirectly affecting attitudes and intentions to purchase. These results held in the case of both firms with and without an established reputation. The results demonstrate the importance of interventions such as self-reported vendor guarantees that affect system trust in enabling successful e-commerce outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045777

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 407

Related

Metadata

Authors
PENNINGTON, R., WILCOX, H. D., & GROVER, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-12
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
197-226
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
DOI
10.1080/07421222.2003.11045777
OpenAlex
W1553517776
Cited by
407
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
22.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
system trust, B2C e-commerce, vendor trust, vendor reputation, trust mechanisms, purchase intention, consumer attitudes, transactional relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review