Cited by 186Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DUTCH VERSION OF THE INVENTORY OF TRAUMATIC GRIEF (ITG)

BOELEN, PAUL A., DEN BOUT, JAN VAN, DE KEIJSER, JOS, HOIJTINK, HERBERT·2003·Death Studies

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Inventory of Traumatic Grief (ITG) were investigated in two studies with bereaved adults who had suffered the loss of a first-degree relative. In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis indicated that the items of the ITG clustered together into one underlying factor. In addition, the internal consistency of the ITG and its short-term temporal stability were found to be high. In Study 2 it was found that the ITG exhibited adequate discriminative, concurrent, and construct validity. Furthermore, an ITG cutoff score for a diagnosis of traumatic grief was determined, with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 76%, providing evidence in favor of the predictive validity of the ITG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481180302889

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BOELEN, P. A., DEN BOUT, J. V., DE KEIJSER, J., & HOIJTINK, H.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2003-04
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
227-247
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W2020927515
Cited by
186
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
traumatic grief, bereavement, psychometric properties, Dutch version, factor structure, internal consistency, temporal stability, discriminant validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, predictive validity, diagnostic thresholds, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Grief, Humans, Netherlands, Psychometrics, Wounds and Injuries, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review