Cited by 109Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthAttachment and Relationship DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Attachment anxiety and avoidance in coping with bereavement: two studies

Meier, Adrienne M., Carr, Drew R., Currier, Joseph M., Neimeyer, Robert A.·2013·Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Although attachment theory has become one of the primary paradigms for understanding bereavement adaptation, there has been surprisingly little empirical work on this topic. Two studies investigated the role of attachment in coping with the loss of a loved one. Study 1 examined the unique contribution of attachment anxiety and avoidance in prolonged grief symptomatology (PCS) in a sample of 656 recently bereaved young adults. When accounting for demographic factors (age, ethnicity, gender) and loss-related circumstances (relationship to deceased, violent versus natural loss), higher levels of attachment-related anxiety were associated with more PCS but avoidance failed to produce a unique effect. Study 2 investigated the role of attachment insecurities in the context of violent death bereavement. Participants were grouped by those who experienced a violent loss in the past two years (accident, suicide, homicide; n = 191) and a matched control group who had not experienced a loss (n = 191). Individuals with higher levels of attachment anxiety reported worse physical and mental health symptoms. Attachment avoidance was a salient predictor of poor post-bereavement functioning for violent loss survivors but avoidant attachment was not as relevant for nonbe-reaved persons. Results of the second study support the worrisome role of attachment anxiety in the context of coping with bereavement, while also suggesting detrimental effects for avoidance in extreme cases of loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/jscp.2013.32.3.315

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meier, A. M., Carr, D. R., Currier, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Fuller Theological Seminary (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Venue
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Published
2013-03
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
315-334
ISSN
0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988578662
Cited by
109
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, bereavement, prolonged grief disorder, insecure attachment, coping with loss, young adults, suicide, homicide, somatic symptoms, psychiatric symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review