Cited by 49Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

A CBT-Based Psychoeducational Intervention for Suicide Survivors: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Study

Wittouck, Ciska, Van Autreve, Sara, Portzky, Gwendolyn, van Heeringen, Kees·2014·Crisis

Abstract

Background: Bereavement following suicide is associated with an increased vulnerability for depression, complicated grief, suicidal ideation, and suicide. There is, however, a paucity of studies of the effects of interventions in suicide survivors. Aims: This study therefore examined the effects of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based psychoeducational intervention on depression, complicated grief, and suicide risk factors in suicide survivors. Method: In total, 83 suicide survivors were randomized to the intervention or the control condition in a cluster randomized controlled trial. Primary outcome measures included maladaptive grief reactions, depression, suicidal ideation, and hopelessness. Secondary outcome measures included grief-related cognitions and coping styles. Results: There was no significant effect of the intervention on the outcome measures. However, the intensity of symptoms of grief, depressive symptoms, and passive coping styles decreased significantly in the intervention group but not in the control group. Conclusion: The CBT-based psychoeducational intervention has no significant effect on the development of complicated grief reactions, depression, and suicide risk factors among suicide survivors. The intervention may, however, serve as supportive counseling for suicide survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910/a000252

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittouck, C., Van Autreve, S., Portzky, G., & van Heeringen, K.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
Venue
Crisis
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
193-201
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W1792813837
Cited by
49
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
suicide survivors, complicated grief, depression, suicidal ideation, suicide risk factors, hopelessness, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoeducational intervention, supportive counseling
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Survivors, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review