Cited by 26Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Emotion regulation deficits across the spectrum of self-harm

Open access
Clapham, Rebekah, Brausch, Amy·2022·Death Studies

Abstract

Suicide and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) are prevalent in emerging adulthood and one possible commonality is emotion regulation deficits. Participants (N = 708) completed multiple self-report measures that assessed emotion regulation deficits, depression, past-year NSSI frequency, past-year suicide attempts, and recent suicide ideation severity. Controlling for depression, linear regression analyses found that the only significant association was between greater deficits in emotion regulation strategies and greater recent NSSI frequency and suicide ideation intensity. These results suggest some commonality in emotion regulation deficits across NSSI and suicide ideation. Prevention and intervention efforts should teach emotion regulation strategies to lower self-harm risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481187.2021.1972366

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The predictive value of emotional dysregulation on suicidal ideation becomes nonsignificant when introducing depressive symptoms and gender in regression.

    “For example, a study by Clapham and colleagues [32] showed that the predictive value of emotional dysregulation on suicidal ideation becomes nonsignificant when introducing depressive symptoms and gender in regression.”

    From The Role of Emotion Dysregulation in Understanding Suicide Risk: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that, after controlling for depression and gender, one emotion-regulation deficit—lack of access to strategies—remained significantly associated with suicidal ideation. Other subscales were nonsignificant, but the unqualified claim that emotional dysregulation became nonsignificant contradicts that finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies did not find statistically significant associations or evidence of emotional dysregulation between patients with and without suicide attempts.

    “Several studies did not find statistically significant associations [30,32,35,45] or evidence of emotional dysregulation between patients with and without suicide attempts [44,54,62,63,67].”

    From The Role of Emotion Dysregulation in Understanding Suicide Risk: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that the model testing emotion-regulation deficits against past-year suicide attempts was not statistically significant, and the Discussion describes no relationship with attempt status. However, the Method > Participants section identifies the sample as undergraduates, not patients; the finding therefore does not establish the claimed comparison in a patient population. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bryan CJ, & Rudd MD (2018). Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for suicide prevention. Guilford Press.
  2. Jobes DA (2016). Managing suicide risk, a collaborative approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clapham, R., & Brausch, A.
Affiliations
Western Kentucky University (US)
Corresponding author
Brausch, Amy
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2021-09-06
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
2477-2484
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W3196382895
Cited by
26
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R15MH113045)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103436)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
emotional dysregulation, non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, depression, emerging adulthood, self-harm prevention, emotion regulation strategies
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Adult, Humans, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Self-Injurious Behavior, Self Report, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review