Cited by 251Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Emotion dysregulation and vulnerability to suicidal ideation and attempts

Rajappa, Kristin, Gallagher, Michelle, Miranda, Regina·2012·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-011-9419-2

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajappa, K., Gallagher, M., & Miranda, R.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Miranda, Regina
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2011-11-09
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
833-839
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W1969446129
Cited by
251
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotional dysregulation, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, repeated suicide attempts, hopelessness, depression, young adults, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review