CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 564Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationDeception detection and forensic psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Examination of the Relationship Between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation

Nonis, Sarath, Swift, Cathy Owens·2001·Journal of Education for Business
DOI 10.1080/08832320109599052
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article addresses academic integrity in both the classroom and the work environment. The authors distributed an in-class questionnaire to a sample of business students from 6 different campuses (N = 1,051). The study was an attempt to bridge the gap between findings related to academic dishonesty and those regarding dishonesty in the workplace. The authors found that students who believed that cheating, or dishonest acts, are acceptable were more likely to engage in these dishonest behaviors. Additionally, students who engaged in dishonest acts in college classes were more likely to engage in dishonest acts in the workplace. The authors suggest some techniques to discourage dishonesty in the classroom.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08832320109599052

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Albrecht , W. S. and Wernz , G. W. 1993 . The three factors of fraud. . Security Management , 37 ( 1 ) : 95 – 96 .
  2. Berton , L. 1995 . Business students hope to cheat and prosper, a new study shows. . Wall Street Journal , 225 ( 80 ) April 25 : B1
  3. Byrne , J. A. 1992 . Can ethics be taught? Harvard gives it the old college try. . Business Week , 6 April : 34
  4. Center for Academic Integrity (CAI). 1998 . Some research highlights Retrieved from http://www.academicintegrityorg/cai_research.asp
  5. Cole , K. 1998 . Engine makers fined $1 billion . The Detroit News , October 23 : 75
  6. Davis , L. 1987 . Moral judgement development of graduate management students in two cultures: Minnesota and Singapore , Minneapolis : University of Minnesota .
  7. Deursch , C. H. 1988 . Cheating: Alive and flourishing. . New York Times Educational Supplement , 137 : 25 – 29 .
  8. Fishbein , L. 1994 . We can curb college teaching. . The Educatioan Digest , 59 ( 7 ) : 58 – 61 .
  9. Fitzpatrick , D. 1995 . Insurance from theft. . Fairfield County Business Journal , 34 ( 20 ) : 13
  10. Gray , R. T. 1997 . Clamping down on worker crime . Nation's Business , April : 44 – 45 .
  11. Horning , D. 1970 . Blue collar theft , New York : Wiley .
  12. 10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446 · DOI · Paper page
  13. McCabe , D. L. and Trevino , L. K. 1996 . What we know about cheating in college . Change , January/February : 29 – 33 .
  14. McCormick , R. C. 1997 . Reviewing business theft and fidelity exposures. . Rough Notes , 140 : 42 80
  15. Meyer , H. 1994 . Corns in the crow . Insights. , Retrieved October 28,1998, from www.insights-inc.com/articles/crows.html
  16. Nazario , S. L. 1992 . Right and wrong: Teaching values makes a comeback as schools see a need to fill a moral vacuum . The Wall Street Journal , September 11 : B6
  17. Nunnally , J. 1978 . Psychometric theory , New York : McGraw-Hill .
  18. Payne , S. L. and Pettingill , B. 1983 . Theft perceptions. . Personnel Administrator , October : 102 – 111 .
  19. Sauser , J. 1990 . The ethics of teaching business: Toward a code for business professors. . SAM Advanced Management Journal , 9 : 33 – 37 .
  20. Singhal , A. C. 1982 . Factors in students' dishonesty: What are institutions of higher education doing and not doing? . NASPA Journal , : 92 – 101 .
  21. Trendwatch. June 1998 . Industry trends—Employee theft among retailers June , Retrieved October 28, 1998, from http://www.nations-bank.com/smallbiz/archives/June98/ind_trends.htm
  22. U.S. Mutual Association (USMA). 1998 . The cost of employee dishonesty Retrieved June 2, 1999, from www.usmutual.com/cost.html

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O.
Affiliations
  • Arkansas State University (US)
  • Georgia Southern University (US)
ORCID
Nonis, Sarath
Venue
Journal of Education for Business
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2001-11
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
69-77
ISSN
  • 0883-2323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-3356
DOI
10.1080/08832320109599052
OpenAlex
W1989903907
Cited by
564
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
20.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Education for Business (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
academic dishonesty, academic integrity, cheating, business students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review