Cited by 70Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and care

Relations between acceptance of multiple sclerosis and positive and negative adjustments

Pakenham, Kenneth Ian, Fleming, Megan·2011·Psychology & Health

Abstract

This study examines relations between acceptance as defined in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and adjustment to multiple sclerosis (MS). A first step in this investigation was the development of a measure of acceptance of MS called the MS Acceptance Questionnaire (MSAQ). Consistent with prior findings and theoretical propositions, it was predicted that acceptance would be associated with better adjustment to MS (lower distress and higher positive affect, life satisfaction and marital adjustment and better health). A total of 128 persons with MS completed measures of demographics, illness and adjustment at Time 1 and measures of acceptance and adjustment 12 months later (Time 2). Factor analyses of the MSAQ revealed two factors, action and willingness. Associations between the MSAQ and other validated acceptance measures supported convergent validity. As predicted, after controlling for the effects of initial adjustment and relevant demographic and illness variables, greater acceptance was related to better adjustment, although the action factor emerged as the strongest predictor of better adjustment. This is the first study to examine the role of acceptance (as defined in ACT) in adjusting to MS over time and as such provides a first step for further investigation of acceptance in MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2010.517838

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pakenham, K. I., & Fleming, M.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Pakenham, Kenneth Ian
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2011-10
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1292-1309
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2075172612
Cited by
70
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Multiple Sclerosis Australia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, acceptance, acceptance and commitment therapy, adaptation to chronic illness, distress, positive affect, life satisfaction, marital adjustment, health outcomes, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Parents, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review