Cited by 75Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and care

Potential treatment mechanisms in a mindfulness‐based intervention for people with progressive multiple sclerosis

Open access
Bogosian, Angeliki, Hughes, Alicia, Norton, Sam, Silber, Eli, Moss‐Morris, Rona·2016·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: To explore putative mediators of a mindfulness‐based intervention to decrease distress in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to explore the patients’ perspectives on this intervention. Design: We used an explanatory mixed methods design incorporating quantitative data from a pilot randomized control trial and a qualitative interview study with people who completed the mindfulness intervention. Methods: People with MS ( n = 40) completed standardized measures of distress (outcome), and acceptance, decentring, self‐compassion, and self‐efficacy (potential mediators). Semi‐structured interviews ( n = 15) of patients’ experiences of the mindfulness intervention were analysed deductively and inductively. Results: Decentring post‐intervention explained 13% of the 3‐month change in distress and between 27% and 31% of concurrent changes in distress. Acceptance changed only slightly, and as a result, the indirect effect accounts for only 2% of future distress and between 3% and 11% of concurrent distress. Qualitative data showed that acceptance and self‐compassion needed more time to develop, whereas decentring could be implemented readily after being introduced in the sessions. Self‐efficacy also had a large mediating effect. Participants in their interviews talked about group dynamics and prior expectations as essential elements that determine their engagement with the course and their level of satisfaction. Conclusions: Mindfulness interventions for people with a chronic progressive condition may benefit from focusing on helping them to accept daily challenges and teach them to recognize their thoughts and feelings, allowing time for acceptance and self‐compassion to develop. Group dynamics also play a fundamental role in the success of the mindfulness interventions. Statement of Contribution: What is already known on this subject? Mindfulness courses improve psychological well‐being for people with chronic conditions. Mindfulness courses have been successful in improving psychological well‐being and symptom management for people with multiple sclerosis but we do not know how these courses work. What does this study add? Decentering and self‐efficacy appear to be key mechanisms leading to reduced distress. Acceptance and self‐compassion may need more time and practice to develop. Group dynamics and expectations of the mindfulness courses were also important elements of mindfulness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjhp.12201

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are validation studies for HADS showing good psychometric properties.

    “There are also some validation studies for HADS showing good psychometric properties [58–61].”

    From Distant delivery of a mindfulness-based intervention for people with Parkinson's disease: The study protocol of a randomised pilot trial (2017) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Primary outcome section discusses the GHQ-12, while Putative Mediators discusses the psychometric properties of other measures. Searches for “HADS” and “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” found no passage in our copy addressing HADS validation or its psychometric properties; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Baer, R. A., & Krietemeyer, J. (2006). Overview of mindfulness- and accetance-based treatmen approaches. In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Mindfulness-based treatmet approaches: Clinician's guide to evidence base and application (pp. 3-27). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
  2. Gregg, J., Callaghan, G., Hayes, S., & Glenn-Lawson, J. (2007). Improving diabetes selfmanagement through acceptance, mindfulness and values: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75 , 336 - 343.
  3. Leary, S. M., & Thompson, A. J. (2000). Current management of multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 54 (3), 161-169.
  4. Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy (Softcover edition ed.). New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.
  5. Thomas, P. W., Thomas, S., Hillier, C., Galvin, K., & Baker, R. (2009). Psychological interventions for multiple sclerosis (review). The Cochrane Library http://www.thecochranelibrary.com .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bogosian, A., Hughes, A., Norton, S., Silber, E., & Moss‐Morris, R.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • Psychology Department Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London UK
Corresponding author
Bogosian, Angeliki
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-06
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
859-880
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W2405477516
Cited by
75
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
MS Society UK (961/11)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, multiple sclerosis, progressive multiple sclerosis, distress, mediators, acceptance, decentering, self-compassion, self-efficacy, group dynamics, patient perspectives, chronic disease, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Stress, Psychological, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Satisfaction, Self Efficacy, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Qualitative Research, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review