Cited by 177Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementFamily Support in Illness

The mental health impacts of receiving a breast cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis

Open access
Fortin, Justine, Leblanc, Mélissandre, Elgbeili, Guillaume, Cordova, Matthew J., Marin, Marie-France, Brunet, Alain·2021·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Background Receiving a breast cancer diagnosis can be a turning point with negative impacts on mental health, treatment and prognosis. This meta-analysis sought to determine the nature and prevalence of clinically significant psychological distress-related symptoms in the wake of a breast cancer diagnosis.Methods Ten databases were searched between March and August 2020. Thirty-nine quantitative studies were meta-analysed.Results The prevalence of clinically significant symptoms was 39% for non-specific distress (n = 13), 34% for anxiety (n = 19), 31% for post-traumatic stress (n = 7) and 20% for depression (n = 25). No studies reporting breast cancer patients' well-being in our specific time frame were found.Conclusion Mental health can be impacted in at least four domains following a diagnosis of breast cancer and such effects are commonplace. This study outlines a clear need for mitigating the impacts on mental health brought about by breast cancer diagnosis. CRD42020203990.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41416-021-01542-3

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breast cancer patients are more likely to experience subclinical psychological problems and symptomatic psychological discomfort, with frequencies ranging from 30% to 75%.

    “Additionally, breast cancer patients are more likely to experience subclinical psychological problems and symptomatic psychological discomfort, with frequencies ranging from 30% to 75% [6].”

    From Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on disease acceptance for breast cancer patients: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Background describes distress ranging from mild to disabling, and the Non-specific distress symptoms section reports a 39.0% prevalence among patients who had just received a breast cancer diagnosis. The paper does not establish the claimed 30%–75% frequency range; its estimate for clinically significant depressive symptoms in pretreatment patients is 19.7%. The claim also generalizes findings about newly diagnosed patients to breast cancer patients overall. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]2. de Sousa Barros AE, Conde CR, Lemos TMR, Kunz JA, da Silva Marques MDL. Feelings experienced by women when receiving the diagnosis of breast cancer. J Nurs UFPE line-Qualis B2. 2018;12:102 -11.
  2. [23]23. Hanson Frost M, Suman VJ, Rummans TA, Dose AM, Taylor M, Novotny P, et al. Physical, psychological and social well -being of women with breast cancer: the in fl uence of disease phase. Psycho -Oncol. 2000;9:221 -31.
  3. [32]32. Tjemsland L, Søreide JA, Malt UF. Traumatic distress symptoms in early breast cancer I: acute response to diagnosis. Psycho -Oncol. 1996;5:1 -8.
  4. [42]42. Cordova MJ, Riba MB, Spiegel D. Post-traumatic stress disorder and cancer. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:330 -8.
  5. [65]65. Arnaboldi P, Lucchiari C, Santoro L, Sangalli C, Luini A, Pravettoni G. PTSD symptoms as a consequence of breast cancer diagnosis: clinical implications. SpringerPlus. 2014;3:392.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fortin, J., Leblanc, M., Elgbeili, G., Cordova, M. J., Marin, M.-F., & Brunet, A.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Palo Alto University (US)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Fortin, Justine
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2021-09-04
Volume
125
Issue
11
Pages
1582-1592
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W3196604109
Cited by
177
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 10
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
breast cancer diagnosis, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, mental health
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review