Cited by 28Polymer composites and self-healingAdvanced Materials and Mechanicsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Biodegradable shape memory nanocomposites with thermal and magnetic field responsiveness

Zhang, Xvming, Lu, Xili, Wang, Zhaomin, Wang, Jianyong, Sun, Zhijie·2013·Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition

Abstract

Thermal and magnetic field responsive biodegradable shape memory polymer nanocomposite was prepared with Fe3O4 nanoparticles and poly(L-lactides) (PLLA). The magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with an average size of 9 nm were initially synthesized by co-precipitation method and then followed by surface modification using oleic acid. The TEM and SEM results show that the surface modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles can evenly disperse in chloroform and PLLA polymer matrix. The tensile test results show that the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to a PLLA matrix greatly improved the elastic modulus, tensile strength, elongation at break, and the shape memory properties as well. Moreover, the shape recovery process of the nanocomposites driven by an alternating magnetic field was also observed. However, the shape recovery ratio and the recovery speed in an alternating magnetic field are lower than that occurred in 70 °C water. The lower shape recovery ratio and the recovery speed in an alternating magnetic field is attributed to the low frequency and strength of the magnetic field, which lead to small heat generated by Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09205063.2012.735098

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evenly dispersed nanofiller (up to 20 wt%) led to an improvement of the mechanical properties of the materials (elastic modulus, tensile strength and elongation at break) as well as their shape-memory properties.

    “The evenly dispersed nanofiller (up to 20 wt%) led to an improvement of the mechanical properties of the materials (elastic modulus, tensile strength and elongation at break) as well as their shapememory properties.”
  • The lower shape recovery ratio and recovery speed were attributed to the low frequency and strength of the magnetic field, which lead to the small heat generated by the Fe3O4 NPs.

    “In this case the authors attributed the lower shape recovery ratio and the recovery speed to the low frequency and strength of the magnetic field, which lead to the small heat generated by the Fe3O4 NPs [158].”
  • Higher Fe3O4 NPs content (30 or 40 wt%) led to a deterioration of these properties as a result of the NPs agglomeration inside the polymer matrix.

    “Higher Fe3O4 NPs content (30 or 40 wt%) led to a deterioration of these properties as a result of the NPs agglomeration inside the polymer matrix.”
  • The shape recovery ratio in PLLA/Fe3O4 (nanofiller content 10 wt%) and the recovery speed in an alternating magnetic field are lower than that occurred in water at 70°C.

    “However, the shape recovery ratio in PLLA/Fe3O4 (nanofiller content 10 wt %) and the recovery speed in an alternating magnetic field are lower than that occurred in water at 70 ° C (Fig. 13(a)).”
  • Fe3O4 NPs synthesized by co-precipitation followed by surface modification using oleic acid were incorporated in PLLA.

    “Fe3O4 NPs initially synthesized by co-precipitation method followed by their surface modification using oleic acid were incorporated in PLLA.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Lu, X., Wang, Z., Wang, J., & Sun, Z.
Affiliations
Harbin Engineering University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Xili
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition
Published
2012-10-15
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1057-1070
ISSN
  • 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5624
OpenAlex
W2069670913
Cited by
28
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
shape memory polymers, biodegradable nanocomposites, Fe3O4 nanoparticles, poly(L-lactic acid), thermal responsiveness, alternating magnetic field, shape recovery, oleic acid surface modification, co-precipitation synthesis, mechanical properties, magnetic hyperthermia
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Particle Size, Polyesters, Polymers, Temperature, Tensile Strength, Thermodynamics, X-Ray Diffraction, Lactic Acid, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Absorbable Implants, Ferrosoferric Oxide, Nanocomposites, Magnetite Nanoparticles, Magnetic Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review