Cited by 72Advanced Materials and MechanicsPolymer composites and self-healingHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Shape memory polymer nanocomposite with multi-stimuli response and two-way reversible shape memory behavior

Abstract

In this work, a novel type of shape memory polymer nanocomposite was fabricated using chemically cross-linked poly(ε-caprolactone) with allyl alcohol as the matrix and Fe3O4 nanoparticles decorated conductive multiwalled carbon nanotubes (Fe3O4@M) as a magnetism and electricity responsive source. The nanocomposite exhibited excellent shape memory performance with a multistage stimulus recovery from a temporary shape to a permanent shape, triggered by an alternating magnetic field, an electric field and hot water, respectively. Uniquely, the nanocomposite also displayed significant two-way reversible shape memory behavior under constant load conditions, which was not demonstrated previously. An alamar blue assay was also used to prove that the material possessed good biocompatibility. The results showed that the material could have good potential application in sensors, functional tissue engineering constructs and artificial muscles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4ra10716k

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The incorporation of the nanofillers with different properties offered the possibility to produce multi-stimuli responsive SMPs upon external thermal (hot water), magnetic field (20 kHz, 6.8 kA/m) and electric field (60 V) stimuli.

    “The incorporation of the nanofillers with different properties offered the possibility to produce multi-stimuli responsive SMPs upon external thermal (hot water), magnetic field (frequency of 20 kHz and strength of 6.8 kA/m) and electric field (60 V) stimuli (Fig. 13(a)).”
  • The Fe3O4@M-filled materials had good biocompatibility against osteoblast cells, suggesting their potential application as smart medical devices (implants, functional tissue engineering constructs and artificial muscles).

    “The Fe3O4@M-filled materials had good biocompatibility against osteoblast cells, suggesting their potential application as smart medical devices (implants, functional tissue engineering constructs and artificial muscles).”
  • The nanocomposite exhibited multistage stimulus recovery from a temporary shape to a permanent one, triggered by alternating the stimuli and this was close to the human physiological temperature.

    “Moreover, it was demonstrated that the nanocomposite exhibited multistage stimulus recovery from a temporary shape to a permanent one, triggered by alternating the stimuli and this was close to the human physiological temperature (Fig. 13(b)).”
  • In 2014, Li and co-workers demonstrated that it was possible to obtain a novel type of SMCs using biodegradable and biocompatible chemically cross-linked PCL with allyl alcohol as polymer matrix and Fe3O4 decorated conductive MWCNTs as a magnetism and electricity responsive source.

    “In 2014, Li and co-workers demonstrated that it was possible to obtain a novel type of SMCs using biodegradable and biocompatible chemically cross-linked PCL with allyl alcohol as polymer matrix and Fe3O4 decorated conductive MWCNTs (Fe3O4@M) as a magnetism and electricity responsive source [166].”
  • The advantage was that the magnetic Fe3O4 layer covered the outside of the MWCNTs and contributed to the magnetic properties while the outside of the WMCNTs (without NPs loading) were responsible for the electric properties of the material.

    “The advantage here was that the magnetic Fe3O4 layer covered the outside of the MWCNTs and contributed to the magnetic properties while the outside of the WMCNTs (without NPs loading) were responsible for the electric properties of the material.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lendlein, 2002, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 41, 2034, 10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2034::AID-ANIE2034>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  2. Lendlein, 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 842

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Liu, Y., & Leng, J.
Affiliations
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Leng, Jinsong
Venue
RSC Adv.
Published
2014-11-18
Volume
4
Issue
106
Pages
61847-61854
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127846763
Cited by
71
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
RSC Advances (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
polycaprolactone, Fe3O4 nanoparticles, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, two-way shape memory, biocompatibility, artificial muscles, tissue engineering scaffolds, sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review