CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118Gender Studies in LanguageDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesMedia, Gender, and Advertising

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender representation in Japanese EFL textbooks–a corpus study

Lee, Jackie F.K.·2018·Gender and Education
DOI 10.1080/09540253.2016.1214690
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper seeks to investigate whether the Japanese government’s attempt to promote a ‘gender-equal’ society in recent decades and the improved status of women are reflected in patterns of gender representation in Japanese English as a foreign language textbooks. The study made an analysis of four popular series of English language textbooks published in 2011 for local Japanese students with corpus linguistic tools (e.g. concordancing, keyword in context) to investigate the ratio of female-to-male appearances, the extent of use of gender-neutral and gender-marked constructions, the common adjectives associated with women and men, the common address titles for reference to women, and the order of appearance of women and men. The findings revealed some evidence of gender equity, including common use of gender-inclusive vocabulary (e.g. salesclerk, waitperson) and the neutral address title Ms for women. The ‘male-first’ phenomenon, however, is still prevalent in contemporary Japanese textbooks, suggesting the secondary status of women. Variations were found in different series of textbooks pertaining to the representation of women and men in the domains of quantitative balance and gender stereotyping. It is suggested that specific guidelines be compiled by the education authorities to help textbook authors write educational materials that help promote a gender-fair society in Japan.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540253.2016.1214690

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Atkins-Sayre W., 2005, Women and Language, 28, 8
  2. Britton G. E., 1977, The Reading Teacher, 31, 40
  3. Cincotta M. S., 1978, BABEL: Journal of the Australian Federation of MLTS Associations, 14, 24
  4. Frasher R., 1972, The Reading Teacher, 25, 741
  5. Lillian D. L., 1995, Linguistica Atlantica, 19, 149
  6. Mineshima M., 2008, Bulletin of Nigata Institute of Technology, 13, 121
  7. Mukundan J., 2008, Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 4, 155
  8. Sakita T. I., 1995, Women and Language, 18, 5
  9. Swann J., 1992, Girls, Boys and Language

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–117 of 117

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J. F. K.
Affiliations
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jackie F.K.
ORCID
Lee, Jackie F.K.
Venue
Gender and Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
379-395
ISSN
  • 0954-0253 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0516
DOI
10.1080/09540253.2016.1214690
OpenAlex
W2495266958
Cited by
118
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gender and Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Meijo University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
gender representation, EFL textbooks, gender equality, gender stereotypes, gender-neutral vocabulary, women's status, gender equity in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review