The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting
Abstract
The benefits of testing on long-term retention of lecture material were examined in a simulated classroom setting. Participants viewed a series of three lectures on consecutive days and engaged in a different type of postlecture activity on each day: studying a lecture summary, taking a multiple choice test, or taking a short answer test. Feedback (correct answers) was provided for half of the responses on the multiple choice and short answer tests. A final comprehensive short answer test was given 1 month later. Restudying or taking a multiple choice test soon after learning improved final recall relative to no activity, but taking an initial short answer test improved final recall the most. Feedback did not affect retention, probably due to the high level of performance on the initial tests. This finding is a powerful demonstration of how tests (especially recall tests) can improve retention of material after long retention intervals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When material has been previously studied, taking an MCQ test followed by feedback has been found to yield comparable final test performance to restudying (e.g.Butler & Roediger, 2007; S. H. K. Kang, McDermott, & Roediger, 2007;McDaniel, Anderson, Derbish, & Morisette, 2007).”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Butler & Roediger, 2007
In the citing paper
“When cued or free recall is employed during the learning phase, many studies have found improved subsequent memory performance on a final test compared to when recognition is used (Butler & Roediger, 2007; Kang et al., 2007; Stenlund et al., 2016); for reviews, see (McDermott, 2021; Rowland, 2014).”
From Does difficulty moderate learning? A comparative analysis of the desirable difficulties framework and cognitive load theory (2025) · cites this paper as Butler & Roediger, 2007
In the citing paper
“This notion can be compared to the DDF/REH in that tasks requiring a generated response (cued and free recall) consistently yield higher long-term retention (Butler & Roediger, 2007; Carpenter & DeLosh, 2006; Endres & Renkl, 2015; Kang et al., 2007; Stenlund et al., 2016); for reviews, see McDermott (2021) and Rowland (2014).”
From Does difficulty moderate learning? A comparative analysis of the desirable difficulties framework and cognitive load theory (2025) · cites this paper as Butler & Roediger, 2007
In the citing paper
“The beneficial effects of retrieval practice have been demonstrated across a variety of materials, as reviewed by Dunlosky et al. (2013).”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Butler & Roediger 2007
In the citing paper
“Some studies have demonstrated testing effects using classroom materials (e.g., Carpenter et al. 2009) or using experimenter-created materials in a simulated classroom setting (Butler & Roediger 2007, Duchastel & Nungester 1982); to date, however, very few studies have attempted to address whether introduction of in-class quizzing can improve actual course grades.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Butler & Roediger 2007
In the citing paper
“Of the more applied studies that have used standard educational materials, many have taken place in simulated classrooms.23”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“On a final test administered 1 month later, taking an initial short-answer test yielded better retention than either taking an initial MCQ test or studying the lecture summary.”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“This study and others indicate that using production tests in the classroom will promote better retention than recognition tests.23,24”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867
Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80016-9 · Cited by 2,296
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 · Cited by 1,888 · cited 1×
“The timing of feedback may be critical, because evidence exists suggesting that the ratio between the interstudy interval and retention interval maximises retention (Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2006 ).”
BackgroundThe instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313
An Extension of Box's Results on the Use of the $F$ Distribution in Multivariate Analysis
Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706545 · Cited by 1,098
The influence of retrieval on retention
Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1992) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03202713 · Cited by 580
Testing the testing effect in the classroom
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440701326154 · Cited by 563
Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention
Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440601056620 · Cited by 513
Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school.
Bahrick, H. P. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.1 · Cited by 505
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gates A. I., 1917, Archives of Psychology, 6
- Jones H. E., 1923, Archives of Psychology, 10, 1
- Schneider W., 2002, E-Prime reference guide
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–436 of 436
Evolución de constructos en psicología. Ejemplos y aportes conceptuales
Manríquez-Betanzos, J. C., & Yanez-Peñúñuri, L. Y. (2021) · Qartuppi eBooks · doi:10.29410/qtp.21.24 · Cited by 1
Teaching Psychopharmacology for Undergraduates
McGee, J. J. (2021) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26248-8_35-2
Dehn, M. J. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118269688.refs
Ludwig, S. (2022) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-9217
Strong, B. (2017) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17065166
(2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119183839.refs
Holmes, J. D. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118760499.ch11
Retrieval Practice and Word Learning in Children with Hearing LossPreprint
de Diego-Lázaro, B. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ycdg2
Lucariello, J. M., Curby, T. W., Anderman, E. M., Nastasi, B. K., Subotnik, R. F., Khalid, M., Michel, R. S., Tinio, P. P. L., & Stoner, G. D. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199841332.013.29
When Learning Is Too Good to Be True
Zaromb, F. M., & Roberts, R. D. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6500-4.ch002
ENHANCED TESTING FOR EDUCATION IN EMERGENCIES
Moroz, T. Y., & Mykytiuk, S. (2023) · Humanities science current issues · doi:10.24919/2308-4863/59-2-49
A method for rewarding collaborative efforts in preclinical assessments
Nolan, M. F., & McNamara, J. P. (2023) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.24058
Método ASES para estudo de textos longos: aproximação, scanning, extração e saturação
Pereira, A. R. (2023) · Perspectivas em Diálogo revista de educação e sociedade · doi:10.55028/pdres.v10i23.18016
Gottlebe, K., Dietrich, S., Berger, I., Angersbach, C., & Latzko, B. (2023) · Medienbildung und Gesellschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-41637-9_4
Free-recall retrieval practice tasks for students with ADHD: whole-text versus section recall
Stern, P., & Halamish, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1301726 · Cited by 1
Wen, M., Ji, X., Zhang, Q., Ma, H., & Ma, X. (2024) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2024.2309919
Impact of modality and mode of questioning and testing on memory reports
Riggenbach, M. R., Gronlund, S. D., & Zoladz, P. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Cognition · doi:10.3389/fcogn.2024.1349511 · Cited by 1
Zapiór, A. (2024) · Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services · doi:10.7494/dmms.2024.18.6291
Learning from errors: deliberate errors enhance learning
Qiang, X., Ma, X., & Li, T. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102379 · Cited by 2
Saraiva, L. T., Righetti, R. F., Alves, M. D. J. S., & Yamaguti, W. P. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21483-8
(2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64113-013-420251016
Testing as an Educational Tool : Utilizing Retrieval Practice to Improve Learning
Silver, S. (2012) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
Sleep-associated and retrieval-associated memory consolidation
Abel, M. (2012) · University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) · doi:10.5283/epub.24260
Jape, D., Zhou, J., & Bullock, S. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19696016
Markova, A., Kasam, A., Hackel, B., Langlois, M., & Lau, S. (2026) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772518 · Cited by 1
Active Learning Beyond Borders
Hayashi, Y., Shimojo, S., Carvalho, P. F., & Koedinger, K. R. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3785022.3785061
Strength of social episodic memory influences subsequent social decisions
Sklenar, A. M., Frankenstein, A. N., Levy, P. U., & Leshikar, E. D. (2026) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2026.2665729
Cleary, A. M., & Robinson, D. H. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10188-7
Clause Encounters of the Third Kind
Šekrst, K., & Kovačić, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198945215.003.0252
Lovreglio, R., Scorgie, D., Paes, D., Vishnupriya, V., Liu, C., Moshood, T. D., Corballis, P., & Feng, Z. (2026) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107332
Creating and Testing a School Evaluation Tool Aligning Education Practices and Neurocognition Theory
Ryan, C., & Leadbetter, R. (2026) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.70057
Learning from mistakes: Objective and subjective error magnitudes predict the testing effect
Shi, A., & Liu, X. L. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-026-03009-z · Cited by 1
Testing enhances subsequent learning in older but not in younger elementary school children
Aslan, A., & Bäuml, K. T. (2015) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12340 · Cited by 42
Summative and Formative Digital Assessment Strategies
Ellison, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52643-5_87-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Butler, Andrew C.
- ORCID
- Butler, Andrew C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 514-527
- ISSN
- 0954-1446 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0635
- OpenAlex
- W2169834253
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- testing effect, long-term retention, recall tests, short-answer tests, multiple-choice tests, feedback, lecture summaries, restudying, simulated classroom, memory retention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
