Cited by 9Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychometric properties of the short form of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory in the Arabic language

Bitar, Zeinab, Fekih Romdhane, Feten, Rogoza, Radoslaw, Ghorab, Hossam M., Obeid, Sahar, Hallit, Souheil·2024·International Journal of Environmental Health Research

Abstract

Interests in including mindfulness techniques in medical and psychological fields have been increasing recently. Accordingly, it is important to validate the short form of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14) to help professionals living in Arabic speaking countries. Thus, we aimed to validate the FMI-14 in the Arabic language (FMI-Ar) in Arabic-speaking university students from Lebanon. We carried-out a cross-sectional study between July and September 2021; 363 university students (mean age 22.65 ± 3.48 years, 61.7% females) were enrolled. The McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha values for the total score were excellent (0.92 for both). Confirmatory factor analysis of the one-factor model of the FMI-Ar showed satisfactory fit indices: χ2/df = 218.33/77 = 2.83, RMSEA = 0.071 [0.060–0.082], CFI = 0.92, and TLI = 0.90. Additionally, the FMI score was negatively associated with depression (r = –0.51; p = 0.001) and anxiety (r = –0.48; p < 0.001). All hypotheses (factor, convergent, and divergent validity) related to the FMI-Ar were verified in our study. Therefore, professionals can now benefit from the FMI-Ar, a suitable scale to measure mindfulness among Lebanese University students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09603123.2023.2267483

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bitar, Z., Fekih Romdhane, F., Rogoza, R., Ghorab, H. M., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
  • The Tunisian Center of Early Intervention in Psychosis, Department of psychiatry “Ibn Omrane”, Razi hospital, Manouba, Tunisia
  • University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Alexandria University (EG)
  • Social and Education Sciences Department, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Jbeil, Lebanon
  • Effat University (SA)
Corresponding author
Hallit, Souheil
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Health Research
Published
2023-10-11
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
2702-2713
ISSN
  • 0960-3123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1619
OpenAlex
W4387516799
Cited by
9
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
no funding
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory, Arabic translation, mindfulness measurement, psychometric validation, factor structure, depression, anxiety, university students, Lebanon
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Language, Lebanon, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Universities, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review