Cited by 36Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Factors that influence the generation of autobiographical memory conjunction errors

Open access
Devitt, Aleea L., Monk-Fromont, Edwin, Schacter, Daniel L., Addis, Donna Rose·2016·Memory

Abstract

The constructive nature of memory is generally adaptive, allowing us to efficiently store, process and learn from life events, and simulate future scenarios to prepare ourselves for what may come. However, the cost of a flexibly constructive memory system is the occasional conjunction error, whereby the components of an event are authentic, but the combination of those components is false. Using a novel recombination paradigm, it was demonstrated that details from one autobiographical memory (AM) may be incorrectly incorporated into another, forming AM conjunction errors that elude typical reality monitoring checks. The factors that contribute to the creation of these conjunction errors were examined across two experiments. Conjunction errors were more likely to occur when the corresponding details were partially rather than fully recombined, likely due to increased plausibility and ease of simulation of partially recombined scenarios. Brief periods of imagination increased conjunction error rates, in line with the imagination inflation effect. Subjective ratings suggest that this inflation is due to similarity of phenomenological experience between conjunction and authentic memories, consistent with a source monitoring perspective. Moreover, objective scoring of memory content indicates that increased perceptual detail may be particularly important for the formation of AM conjunction errors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2014.998680

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Failures of source or reality monitoring occur because remembered and imagined events are often very similar in content and phenomenology, for instance when imagined events are elaborate, vivid, and plausible.

    “By the continuist view, failures of source/reality monitoring occur because remembered and imagined events are often very similar in content and phenomenology, for instance, when imagined events are elaborate, vivid, and plausible (Devitt, Monk-Fromont, Schacter, & Addis, 2016;Garry, Manning, Loftus, & Sherman, 1996;Johnson et al., 1993).”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Devitt, Monk-Fromont, Schacter, & Addis, 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devitt, A. L., Monk-Fromont, E., Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Devitt, Aleea L.
Venue
Memory
Published
2015-01-22
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
204-222
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2053353485
Cited by
36
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG08441)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, conjunction errors, memory construction, imagination inflation, source monitoring, reality monitoring, perceptual detail
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Mental Recall, Repression, Psychology, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review