Cited by 92Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Evolving trends in next-generation probiotics: a 5W1H perspective

Almeida, Diana, Machado, Daniela, Andrade, José Carlos, Mendo, Sónia, Gomes, Ana Maria, Freitas, Ana Cristina·2020·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

In recent years, scientific community has been gathering increasingly more insight on the dynamics that are at play in metabolic and inflammatory disorders. These rapidly growing conditions are reaching epidemic proportions, bringing clinicians and researcher’s new challenges. The specific roles and modulating properties that beneficial/probiotic bacteria hold in the context of the gut ecosystem seem to be key to avert these inflammatory and diet-related disorders. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila and Eubacterium hallii have been identified as candidates for next generation probiotics (NGPs) with exciting potential for the prevention and treatment of such of dysbiosis-associated diseases. The challenges of these non-conventional native gut bacteria lie mainly on their extreme sensitivity to O2 traces. If these strains are to be used successfully in food, supplements or drugs they need to be stable and active in humans. In the present review, we present an overall perspective of the most updated scientific literature on the newly called NGPs through the 5W1H (What, Why, Who, Where, When, and How) method, an innovative and attractive problem-solving approach that provides the reader an effective understanding of the issue at hand.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2019.1599812

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Almeida, D., Machado, D., Andrade, J. C., Mendo, S., Gomes, A. M., & Freitas, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
  • Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário (PT)
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
Freitas, Ana Cristina
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
60
Issue
11
Pages
1783-1796
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2944475046
Cited by
92
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), FCT/MEC, FEDER - FCT
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
next-generation probiotics, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila, Eubacterium hallii, gut microbiota, dysbiosis, inflammatory diseases, metabolic disorders, oxygen sensitivity, probiotic stability
MeSH terms
Clostridiales, Eubacteriales, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Humans, Probiotics, Verrucomicrobia, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review