The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing Self-Regulatory Processes Among Novice, Non-Expert, and Expert Volleyball Players: A Microanalytic Study
Abstract
Differences in self-regulatory processes of 30 college women who were volleyball Experts, Non-Experts, or Novices were studied regarding overhand serving skill during a practice episode. It was hypothesized that Experts would display better goals, planning, strategy use, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, attributions, and adaptation than either Non-Experts or Novices. It was also hypothesized that Experts would display higher self-efficacy beliefs, perceived instrumentality, intrinsic interest, and self-satisfaction in volleyball serving than either Non-Experts or Novices. All hypotheses were supported. The combined 12 measures of self-regulation predicted 90 percent of the variance in the women's volleyball serving skill. The findings are discussed according to a three-phase model of self-regulation, and recommendations are made for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second, in a similar study, Kitsantas and Zimmerman (2002) compared college women that were experts and non-experts in volleyball, finding that the SRL skills predicted 90% variance in serving skills.”
From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Kitsantas and Zimmerman (2002)
In the citing paper
“Third, Cleary and Zimmerman (2001, 2012), Kitsantas and Zimmerman (2002), DiBenedetto and Zimmerman (2010) developed microanalytic measures to assess the validity of the Cyclical Phases model.”
From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Kitsantas and Zimmerman (2002)
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7 · Cited by 6,069
Self-citationTosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
Attention and Self-Regulation : A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,580
Expert performance: its structure and acquisition.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.725 · Cited by 2,072
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5887-2 · Cited by 2,039
Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: Evidence from computer simulations.
Allen, N. J., Stanley, D. J., Williams, H., & Ross, S. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1414 · Cited by 2,034
Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994) · Cited by 1,492
Self-citationApplied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance
Williams, J. M. (2005) · Cited by 849
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Paull G., 1997, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 35
- Schunk D. H., 1994, Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, 75
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312909 · Cited by 3,735
Self-citationA Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research
Panadero, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 · Cited by 2,915
“Third, Cleary and Zimmerman (2001, 2012), Kitsantas and Zimmerman (2002), DiBenedetto and Zimmerman (2010) developed microanalytic measures to assess the validity of the Cyclical Phases model.”
BackgroundResultHandbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315697048 · Cited by 1,977
From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: a social cognitive career path.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.794676 · Cited by 991
Self-citationEnhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention.
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019506 · Cited by 757
Metadata
- Authors
- Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- City University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-105
- ISSN
- 1041-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-1571
- OpenAlex
- W2124946239
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Keywords
- self-regulation, volleyball, skill acquisition, expertise, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, self-assessment, attribution, adaptation, goal setting, planning, strategy use, intrinsic interest, self-satisfaction, female athletes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
