Cited by 122Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

On the Unique Psychological Import of the Human Awareness of Mortality: Theme and Variations

Pyszczynski, Tom, Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon, Maxfield, Molly·2006·Psychological Inquiry

Abstract

We are gratified that after 20 years, terror management theory (TMT; Greenberg, Pyszczynski, & Solomon, 1986), a formalization of Becker's (1971, 1973, 1975) integrative interdisciplinary analysis ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10478400701369542

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After a delay, people resort to indirect, symbolic, distal defenses by invoking cultural worldviews, meaning-centered values, and self-esteem to maintain cognitive equilibrium.

    “people must resort to indirect, symbolic, distal defenses , whereby they invoke cultural worldviews, meaning-centered values and self-esteem to maintain the cognitive equilibrium”

    From An Integrative Terror Management Theory Perspective on Media Effects: A Model and 12 Hypotheses for Research (2016) · cites this paper as Pyszczynski, Greenberg, Solomon, & Maxfield, 2006

  • Terror management theory hypotheses primarily receive support when a delay ensues between the manipulation of mortality salience and measurement of the dependent variable.

    “TMT hypotheses primarily receive support when a delay ensues between the manipulation of mortality salience and measurement of the dependent variable.”

    From An Integrative Terror Management Theory Perspective on Media Effects: A Model and 12 Hypotheses for Research (2016) · cites this paper as Pyszczynski, Greenberg, Solomon, & Maxfield, 2006

  • Meaning/certainty threats may increase worldview defense after a short delay and be less apt to do so after a long delay.

    “Given the TMT theorizing that worldview defense arises when death thoughts are highly accessible but not in awareness, meaning/certainty threats may increase worldview defense after a short delay and be less apt to do so after a long delay (Pyszczynski et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Maxfield, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Skidmore College (US)
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Published
2006-10-29
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
328-356
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
OpenAlex
W1979895129
Cited by
122
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
terror management theory, fear of death, human uniqueness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review