Cited by 107Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsStudent Assessment and FeedbackVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning

Open access

Latifi, Saeed, Noroozi, Omid, Talaee, Ebrahim·2023·Interactive Learning Environments

DOI 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

This study compared the effects of worked example and scripting on students’ argumentative peer feedback, essay and learning qualities. Participants were 80 BSc students who were randomly divided over 40 dyads and assigned to two experimental conditions (worked example and scripting). An online peer feedback environment named EduTech was designed and students were tasked with writing an argumentative essay, engaging in peer feedback, and revising their essay. The results indicate that students in the scripting condition benefited more than students in the worked example condition regarding peer feedback quality. Furthermore, the scores of students in both conditions improved from pre-test to post-test in terms of argumentative essay writing and learning. This difference was significant, however, between the two conditions only with regard to argumentative essay writing favoring the scripting condition. We explain how each of these approaches can be used to improve students’ argumentative peer feedback and essay writing and learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Power of Feedback
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 2×
“In other words, peer feedback not only leads to improvement of students’writing proficiency, but also helps them develop discipline-specific knowledge (Liu & Carless, 2006), enhance their understandings on the topic (Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Liu & Carless, 2006).”
Background
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 7,776 · cited 1×
“Scientific research has shown that worked examples can facilitate problem solving processes (Kirschner et al., 2006) and the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge (Kyun et al., 2013) by reducing extraneous cognitive load which in turn lead to better learning outcomes (Sweller et al., 2011).”
Background
The Uses of Argument
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Cognitive Load Theory
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_446 · Cited by 6,172
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122 · Cited by 1,198
Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510600680582 · Cited by 1,034
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966
An introduction to reasoning
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. S. (1979) · Cited by 923
The Evolution of Research on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1 · Cited by 638

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 · DOI · Paper page
10.3102/00346543068003249 · DOI · Paper page
Wang X.-M., 2017, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20, 58

Sorted by citations

Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's Perspective
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296 · Cited by 418
Teacher’s Perceptions of Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Tool for Scientific Writing
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.755914 · Cited by 298
Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?
Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 · Cited by 188
Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing
Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8 · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babaee, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887 · Cited by 105
Self-citation
Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students’ argumentative essay quality
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C.-L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y · Cited by 83
Self-citation
ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills
Darmawansah, D., Rachman, D., Febiyani, F., & Hwang, G. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4 · Cited by 96
Does perception mean learning? Insights from an online peer feedback setting
Noroozi, O., Alqassab, M., Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., & Panadero, E. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2345669 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education
Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2081209 · Cited by 80
Engaging secondary school students with peer feedback in L2 writing classrooms: A mixed-methods study
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62
A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education
Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education
Noroozi, O. (2022) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2022.2092188 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
The impact of automated writing evaluation on English as a foreign language learners' writing self‐efficacy, self‐regulation, anxiety, and performance
Sarı, E., & Han, T. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13004 · Cited by 57
Empowering the collective reflection-based argumentation mapping strategy to enhance students’ argumentative speaking
Darmawansah, D., Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104516 · Cited by 69
How does the type of online peer feedback influence feedback quality, argumentative essay writing quality, and domain-specific learning?
Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2215822 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Exploring pre-service biology teachers’ intention to teach genetics using an AI intelligent tutoring - based system
Adelana, O. P., Ayanwale, M. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2310976 · Cited by 78
Exploring EFL students’ prompt engineering in human–AI story writing: an activity theory perspective
Woo, D. J., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2361381 · Cited by 67
Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script
Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Using scaffolded feedforward and peer feedback to improve problem-based learning in large classes
Rodríguez, M. F., Nussbaum, M., Yunis, L., Reyes, T. H., Alvares, D., Joublan, J. P., & Navarrete, P. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104446 · Cited by 46
Learners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher corrective feedback conditions
Mahvelati, E. H. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995 · Cited by 59
The effects of collaborative reasoning strategies on improving primary school students’ argumentative decision-making skills
Bayat, M., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2022) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2022.2155602 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
The effects of peer interaction on learning outcome of college students in digital environment—The chain-mediated role of attitude and self-efficacy
Pan, F., Zhu, G., Sui, W., & Fu, M. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101404 · Cited by 26
Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study
Wu, C., Zhang, Y.-W., & Li, A. W. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w · Cited by 35
The synergistic effects in an AI-supported online scientific argumentation learning environment
Lin, Y., & Hung, C. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105251 · Cited by 25
The Power of Peer Learning
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
How peer feedback with regulation scripts contributes to the development of critical thinking in dialogues: strengthening cognitive and affective feedback content
Shao, J., Cheng, L., Wang, Y., Li, K., & Li, Y. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2251040 · Cited by 19
Challenges and affordances of reading and writing development in technology-assisted language learning
Bahari, A., & Gholami, L. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2065308 · Cited by 21
Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing in Higher Education in a Country of Emerging Economy: An Analysis of Knowledge, Perceived Influence, Extent of Use and Perception
Clorion, F. D. D., Alieto, E. O., Fuentes, J. O., Suicano, D. J. B., Natividad, E.-R. R., Miñoza, M. V., Pil, A. I. O., Aidil-Karanain, F., & Vallejo, R. G. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0_16 · Cited by 18
The Relationship Among Students’ Attitude Towards Peer Feedback, Peer Feedback Performance, and Uptake
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_16 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
The Effect of STEM Practices on Teaching Speaking Skills in Language Lessons
Seitenova, S. S., Khassanova, I., Khabiyeva, D., Kazetova, A., Madenova, L., & Yerbolat, B. (2023) · International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology · doi:10.46328/ijemst.3060 · Cited by 28
The Effect of Project-Based Learning in Visual Arts Lesson on Lesson Outcomes and Attitudes
Özkan, Z. C. (2023) · International Journal on Social and Education Sciences · doi:10.46328/ijonses.565 · Cited by 30
The enactment of positive emotions via teacher scaffolding: The case of Chinese high school EFL learners’ engagement with teacher written feedback
Cheng, X., Gao, L. X., & Liu, Y. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103375 · Cited by 19
Improving hybrid brainstorming outcomes with computer-supported scaffolds: Prompts and cognitive group awareness
Farrokhnia, M., Noroozi, O., Baggen, Y., Biemans, H. J. A., & Weinberger, A. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105229 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
AI assistance in peer feedback provision: Pedagogically sound, but minimally adopted
Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Gašević, D., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105591 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Creating my own story: Improving children’s creative thinking and composition creativity through a three-staged individual-group-individual story writing framework
Kuo, H., Chang, C., Wang, J.-P., Wu, E. L., & Li, P. (2024) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101513 · Cited by 22
The Power of Peer Review
Abdallah, A. K., Aljanahi, M. H., & Almejalli, H. A. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0880-6.ch016 · Cited by 10
The impacts of self-monitoring prompt on provision and uptake of peer feedback and on revision performance: A mixed methods study
Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Wang, J., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101442 · Cited by 10
ARGUMENTATION-BASED COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (ABCSCL): THE ROLE OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORTS
Noroozi, O. (2020) · European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies · doi:10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3279 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Comparative Analysis of Senior High School Learners’ Academic Performance in Traditional Face-to-Face and Online Distance Learning Modalities
Cano, J. S. (2022) · International Journal on Social and Education Sciences · doi:10.46328/ijonses.369 · Cited by 21
Integrating Different Group Patterns into Collaborative Argumentative Writing in the Shimo Platform
Su, F., Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2022) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-022-09632-8 · Cited by 10
Constructing Computer-Mediated Feedback in Virtual Reality for Improving Peer Learning: A Synthesis of the Literature in Presentation Research
van Ginkel, S. O., & Sichterman, B. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_7 · Cited by 10
Using an integrated discourse analysis approach to analyze a group's collaborative argumentation
Ouyang, F., Tang, Z., Cheng, M., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101227 · Cited by 9
Students' argumentation performance in online learning environments: Bridging culture and gender
Ranjbaran, F., Babaee, M., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Gohari, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.460 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Online peer feedback via Moodle forum: Implications for longitudinal feedback design and feedback quality
Xie, Q., & Chang, Z. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105167 · Cited by 11
Automated feedback complements online dialogic peer feedback: fostering L2 writers’ feedback quality and self-regulatory writing strategy use
Yan, D. “., Jia, C., & Tian, F. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2491620 · Cited by 8
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Banihashem, S. K., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2517617 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
The moderating effects of total comments on the relationship between comment implementation and online peer-supported writing performance
Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., Zhang, H., Courtney, M. G. R., Baldwin, M., & Costley, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105104 · Cited by 8
Research on information searching strategies in high school students’ quality of argumentative essay writing
Tsai, P.-S. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2046108 · Cited by 8
Exploring peer facilitation and critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions: A lag sequential analysis approach
Zhang, E., Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Han, S., & Xue, Z. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13583 · Cited by 9
Examining the use of ChatGPT in Argumentative Writing: A Mixed Methods Study
Annamalai, N., Uthayakumaran, A., Bervell, B., & Kumar, R. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Academics · doi:10.1177/1932202x251333859 · Cited by 9
Digital peer feedback on visual ideas: a study of eighth-grade students in visual art
Forslind, E.-L., Hrastinski, S., & Forsler, I. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2164785 · Cited by 8
The impact of different peer feedback types on student academic writing performance from dyadic and individual analyses
Zhang, H., Costley, J., Courtney, M. G. R., Shulgina, G., & Fanguy, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13032-z · Cited by 6
Peer Tutoring and Math Digital Tools: A Promising Combination in Middle School
Miravet, L. M., Alegre, F., & Valentín, G. L. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10132360 · Cited by 5
Ask your peer! How requests for peer feedback affect peer feedback responses
van Blankenstein, F. M., Dirkx, K., & Bruycker, N. D. (2024) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2024.2376832 · Cited by 5
Exploring scientific writing as part of a learning model for interprofessional higher health education – A qualitative study
Vasset, F. P., Dahl, B. M., Thunem, G., & Frilund, M. L. (2023) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100759 · Cited by 5
Keeping balance between loyalty and modification: a Toulminian model as analytical framework
Liu, D., & Xiong, M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03151-w · Cited by 5
A Toulmin Model Analysis of Student Argumentation on Artificial Intelligence
Turós, M., Kenyeres, A. Z., Balla, G., Gazdag, E., Szabó, E., & Szűts, Z. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091226 · Cited by 4
The Effect of Mind Map as a Prewriting Activity in Third Grade Elementary Students' Descriptive Narrative Creative Writing With a Writing E‐Portfolio
Mustika, M., Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Liao, C.-Y., & Chan, T.-W. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70006 · Cited by 12
A Thematic Analysis of Factors Influencing Student’s Peer-Feedback Orientation
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_12 · Cited by 4
Visual peer feedback using a digital space: a study of sixth-grade students in the visual arts classroom
Forslind, E.-L., Hrastinski, S., & Forsler, I. (2025) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-025-09527-2 · Cited by 4
Teaching with Technology 2020
(2021) · doi:10.37546/jaltsig.call2020 · Cited by 3
Enhancing coherence and student engagement through portfolio assignments and peer-feedback
Oestergaard, L. G., Hansen, J. S., Ravn, M. B., & Maribo, T. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00260-1 · Cited by 5
Support Student Integration of Multiple Peer Feedback on Research Writing in Thesis Circles
Hsiao, Y. P., & Rajagopal, K. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_3 · Cited by 4
An Examination of Pre-Service Teachers' Metaphorical Perceptions about Turkish Language Lessons Taught through Distance Education
Bulut, M., & Kırbaş, A. (2022) · International Journal of Technology in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijtes.427 · Cited by 3
Methodology of using artificial intelligence technologies to create student written works in Russian universities
Trusov, S. V. (2025) · Вестник Майкопского государственного технологического университета · doi:10.47370/2078-1024-2025-17-2-99-110 · Cited by 2
Design of collaborative scripts to promote shared regulation in online collaborative learning activities
Yuan, S., Huang, H., & Jiang, Y. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2589405 · Cited by 2
The Effects of Question Prompts and Worked Examples on Primary School Students’ Scientific Achievement, Argumentation Skills, Motivation, and Cognitive Load
Xu, C., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16030335 · Cited by 2
Harnessing the power of education for social change
Diko, M. (2023) · EUREKA Social and Humanities · doi:10.21303/2504-5571.2023.003051 · Cited by 2
Role of Conjunctions and Students’ Cognitive Characteristics in Argumentative Essay Writing
Sobari, T., Mulyadi, Y., Wikanengsih, W., & Mustika, I. (2024) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.23.3.6 · Cited by 2
Effectiveness of integration of teaching reading and writing skills based on critical thinking skills in improving argumentation essay writing ability
Prayogi, A., Mulyati, Y., Sastromiharjo, A., & Damaianti, V. S. (2022) · Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.18844/cjes.v17i12.8227 · Cited by 2
SCAFFOLDING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYWRITING: AN ONLINE SCRIPTED PEER FEEDBACK AND PEER FEEDFORWARD MODULE
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023) · Education and new developments · doi:10.36315/2023v2end013 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Investigating the element distribution of argumentative essay and its quality: The case of Indonesian EFL students’ writing
Nirwanto, R., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., & Wulyani, A. N. (2024) · Journal on English as a Foreign Language · doi:10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7824 · Cited by 1
Innovative Approaches to Revolutionize Student-Centered Learning in the 21st Century
Salendab, F. A., & Tago, K. L. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5102-5.ch002 · Cited by 1
Effects of interactive vs. complementary approaches to integrating automated and peer feedback on L2 writers’ feedback quality and performance improvement
Yan, D. “., & Gao, Y. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2569352 · Cited by 1
Exploring the impact of hypotheticality on students’ argumentation in online gamified learning environment
Lin, Y.-R., & Jiao, X. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102044 · Cited by 3
Real-time AI-mediated peer feedback in L2 writing: a mixed-methods study of learner engagement and accuracy development
Zhang, Y., & Hashemifardnia, A. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2613722 · Cited by 2
A Coding Framework for Analyzing the Types and Levels of Peer Feedback
Lee, S., & Ha, M. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261418083 · Cited by 1
Research on the Influence of an Online Collaborative English Learning Platform on College Students' English Writing Ability
Chen, L., & Yan, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijmhci.405411 · Cited by 1
Navigating Scientific Uncertainty Through Scripted Collaborative Argumentation: Effects on Conceptual Understanding, Critical Thinking, and Learning Engagement
Liu, S., Xu, M., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00740-w · Cited by 1
Automated feedback on argumentative writing: The role of secondary students' feedback receptivity and feedback perception
Jansen, T., Bahr, J. L., Schaller, N.-J., Höft, L., & Meyer, J. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102969 · Cited by 2
Applying Shimo-supported concept maps, mind maps, and argument maps to assist students’ argumentative writing
Su, F., & Zou, D. (2022) · International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Computing · doi:10.1109/besc57393.2022.9995109 · Cited by 1
Starting with the Self: A Pathway to Reimagining the Essay
Kent, C. R. (2022) · The English Journal · doi:10.58680/ej202231567 · Cited by 1
Embedding Prompts to Facilitate Small Groups’ Computer-Supported Collaborative Concept Mapping
Ouyang, F., & Zheng, L. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2233124 · Cited by 2
How Do the Images of Scientists in Secondary School Science Textbooks Affect Students’ Perceptions of Scientists?
Arslan, K., Akçay, H., & Kapıcı, H. Ö. (2023) · International Journal on Social and Education Sciences · doi:10.46328/ijonses.434 · Cited by 1
Peer feedback modelling needs in online higher education: An exploratory study
Henderikx, M., Vrieling, E., Molin, F., & Nadolski, R. J. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101464 · Cited by 9
Navigating Academic Writing: EFL Students Teachers’ Challenges and Solutions
Nawangsih, N., Fajaryani, N., & Abrar, M. (2024) · Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran · doi:10.19109/6gkfyw37 · Cited by 1
Sociocultural influences on peer feedback in Chinese EFL classrooms: Trust, anonymity, and emotional safety
He, H., Said, N., & Peter, J. (2026) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2026.101028
Shimo-based collaborative argumentative writing: Do grouping patterns matter?
Su, F., & Zou, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt52272.2021.00087
Can Rating Be More Than a Warm-Up Activity in Classroom Assessments? Exploring the Role of Rating in Peer and Self-Assessments
Cheong, C. M., Zhu, X., & Lu, Q. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311251346498
The influences of self-monitoring level in feedback-giving and prior knowledge on revision performance in online formative peer assessment: A moderated mediation analysisPreprint
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Yang, J., & Pi, Z. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5573626
CS Teaching Assistant Perceptions on LLM-Generated Faded Worked Examples for Feedback Training
Gonzaga, J. T., Vassar, A., & Jiang, Y. (2026) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772582
Integrating artificial intelligence to enhance frequency of learning cycles: a proof-of-concept study
Svellingen, A. H. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06928-3
Using artificial intelligence technologies by university graduates as a factor of social transformation
Trusov, S. V. (2026) · Вестник Майкопского государственного технологического университета · doi:10.47370/2078-1024-2026-18-1-158-168
Students’ perspectives on writing an argumentative essay in an academic literacy module
Bharuthram, S. (2026) · Reading & Writing · doi:10.4102/rw.v17i1.571
AI-assisted vibe coding with Base44: Creating personalized tools for argumentative writing
Pan, M., Li, K., & Lai, C. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101076
Investigating students’ engagement with GenAI-supported peer feedback generation in EFL writing
Guo, K., Li, D., Pan, M., & Lai, C. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2679729
Not All Received Peer Feedback Is Equal: The Self‐Regulation Bridge Between Online Peer Feedback and Learning Outcomes
Zhang, E., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Li, J., & Liu, H. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70288
How peer-mediated AI-generated feedback shapes EFL writing performance: A small-scale exploratory case study
Zhang, Y., Chen, L., & Chen, X. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102338

Authors: Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E.
Affiliations: Kharazmi University (IR)
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Corresponding author: Noroozi, Omid
ORCID: Latifi, Saeed
Noroozi, Omid
Talaee, Ebrahim
Venue: Interactive Learning Environments
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2020-08-01
Volume: 31
Issue: 2
Pages: 655-669
ISSN: 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
1744-5191
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
OpenAlex: W3046276216
Cited by: 107
References: 71
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI: 16.99
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by-nc-nd
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (unspecified)
Locations: Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords: worked examples, scripting, argumentative essay writing, online peer feedback, essay revision, argumentation, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks